THERAPEUTIC METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DIABETES AND RELATED CONDITIONS FOR PATIENTS WITH HIGH BASELINE HbA1c

ABSTRACT

The present invention is directed to treatments for a disease or condition, in a subject in need thereof, that provide alternatives to treatment by injection that give, relative to treatment by injection, improved treatment outcomes, 100% treatment compliance, reduced side effects, and rapid establishment and/or termination of substantial steady-state drug delivery. The method includes providing continuous delivery of a drug from an implanted osmotic delivery device, wherein substantial steady-state delivery of the drug at therapeutic concentrations is achieved within about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject and the substantial steady-state delivery of the drug from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over a period of at least about 3 months. In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus using insulinotrophic peptides. In embodiments, a subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5% or 10.0%.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/750,432 filed on Jan. 23, 2020, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/868,708 filed on Jan. 11, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,583,080, which application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/871,420 filed Sep. 30, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,889,085, which application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. Nos. 62/212,539, filed Aug. 31, 2015, 62/171,876, filed Jun. 5, 2015, 62/139,520, filed Mar. 27, 2015, and 62/057,892, filed Sep. 30, 2014. The entire contents of each above-mentioned applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.

SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Aug. 3, 2020, is named ITCA-042USCON3_ST25.txt and is 1,649 bytes in size.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to organic chemistry, formulation chemistry, and peptide chemistry applied to pharmaceutical research and development. Aspects of the present invention include, but are not limited to, methods of treatment for a disease or condition in a subject in need of such treatment. In one embodiment, the disease is type 2 diabetes mellitus. In other embodiments, the present invention relates to therapeutic methods for lowering plasma glucose and HbA1c levels in diabetic subjects, including subjects having high baseline HbA1c levels, by continuous subcutaneous delivery of an anti-diabetic medication such as an exenatide from an implanted drug delivery device (subdermal) over an administration period. Improvements with respect to weight loss, the incidence and severity of side effects, quality of life measures, and patient tolerance to dose escalation during treatment are also provided. In some embodiments, a subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5% or greater than 10.0%.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) resulting from insulin deficiency (the inability of the body to produce sufficient insulin) or insulin resistance (the inability of the body to use insulin properly). Chronic hyperglycemia is likely to worsen type 2 diabetes mellitus, as excessive glucose in the blood can damage the pancreas (and thus impair insulin release, a condition which can become permanent) and contribute to insulin deficiency. Long-term complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus include heart disease, stroke, diabetic retinopathy, kidney failure, and poor blood circulation to the limbs, which may require amputation.

Long term hyperglycemia is monitored by periodic measurement of a subject's hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. HbA1c levels reflect a subject's average blood glucose levels over the previous two to three months. Studies have shown that the incidences of clinical complications from type 2 diabetes are significantly associated with a subject's degree of hyperglycemia, as indicated by HbA1c levels. In the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), incidence rates for any end point related to diabetes (e.g., fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, amputation or death from peripheral vascular disease, and fatal or non-fatal microvascular disease) was three-fold greater for subjects in the highest HbA1c level category, e.g., greater than or equal to 10%, when compared to subjects with HbA1c of less than 6%. Furthermore, the UKPDS study showed that there are many benefits from reducing a high HbA1c level; as examples, reducing HbA1c levels by 1% results in a 14% decrease in risk of fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, a 12% decrease in risk of fatal or non-fatal stroke, a 21% decrease in risk of diabetes-related death, a 43% decrease in risk of amputation, and a 37% decrease in risk of small blood vessel disease (e.g., retinal blood vessel disease causing vision loss). Methods for reducing HbA1c levels in subjects with type 2 diabetes, particularly those with high (e.g., >10%) HbA1c levels, is warranted.

A variety of drug dosage forms and methods of drug administration have been developed for delivery of drugs to mammals, in particular, for delivery of drugs to humans (see, e.g., the Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy, 18th edition, Published by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Whitehouse Station, N.J.). Such dosage forms include, for example, use of the following routes of administration: oral; injection (e.g., intravenously, intramuscularly, intrathecally, subdermally, and subcutaneously); implantation (e.g., subcutaneous); and across a skin or mucosal barrier (e.g., sublingual, rectal, vaginal, ocular, nasal, inhalation into the lungs, topical, and transdermal). Each route of administration has specific purposes, advantages, and disadvantages.

The oral route of administration is the most common and generally considered to be the most convenient. Oral administration, however, poses some limitations because drugs administered by this route can be subject to inter- and/or intra-subject variability and result in variable 24 hour plasma drug exposure. Other routes of administration may be required when the oral route cannot be used.

When drugs are prepared for administration by injection (e.g., subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravenous, and intrathecal administration), the drug can be formulated in a variety of ways including formulations that prolong drug absorption from the injection site for hours, days, or longer. Such formulations are typically used for subcutaneous injection. Injectable products formulated for prolonged delivery typically are not administered as often as injectable drug products having more rapid absorption. Subcutaneous administration is used for many protein or peptide drugs because such drugs are typically broken down by the digestive system to inactive forms if taken orally. Subcutaneous administration of a drug typically requires frequent self-injection, for example, one or more times daily or once-weekly injections.

When a large volume of a drug product is required, intramuscular administration is generally the preferred route of administration. Typically, intramuscular administration of drugs is by injection into the muscle of the upper arm, thigh, or buttock. The rate of drug absorption into the bloodstream in large part depends on the blood supply to the muscle, that is, the more blood supply the faster the drug is absorbed.

Intravenous drug administration requires that a needle be inserted directly into a vein. A drug may be given in a single dose or continuously infused. For infusion, a drug solution is either delivered using gravity (e.g., from a collapsible plastic bag) or using an infusion pump through a tube inserted in a vein, usually in the forearm. An intravenous injection can be more difficult to administer than a subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, for example, because inserting a needle or catheter into a vein may be difficult, drugs typically must be mixed within a relatively short time before beginning administration, there is an increased chance of infection (e.g., abscessed infections of injection sites caused by lack of hygiene and/or a lack of correct aseptic technique), and over time there is scarring damage to the peripheral veins.

When drugs are administered by intravenous injection it is often desirable for health care practitioners to closely monitor subjects for signs that the drug is working and that the drug is not causing undesired side effects. Typically, the effect of intravenously administered drugs tends to last for a shorter periods of time than drugs administered by subcutaneous injection or intramuscular injection. Therefore, some drugs must be administered by continuous infusion to provide appropriate therapeutic effect. Because of the difficulties associated with intravenous drug administration it is most typically used in hospital or skilled care settings; it is rarely used for long-term self-administered treatment.

A number of complications negatively impact compliance with injection treatment regimens, including, but not limited to, the following. For a subject that is needle phobic, this is particularly troublesome when a drug must be self-injected over extended periods of time. Compliance can also be complicated by the inconvenience of administration of a drug by injection, for example, when subjects are in public or busy with daily activities. Also, frequent self-administration of a drug reminds subjects of their disease state and carries a stigma associated with the disease and/or treatment. Additionally, there is a risk of depot of drug at injection site, such as when the drug does not sufficiently or rapidly diffuse or distributed into adjoining tissues. Such depot can lead to undesirable immune reactions, e.g., immune complex formation, inflammation, and high antibody titer, and/or can lead to local swelling, redness, and pain.

The implantable osmotic delivery devices of the present invention, and use of these osmotic delivery devices in methods for the treatment of diseases or conditions in subjects in need of treatment, uniquely address unmet needs of previously described drug dosage forms and methods of treatment. For example, the present invention provides treatment of subjects at a target drug dose that is continuously administered over time with the ability to rapidly establish and sustain over time substantial steady-state drug delivery while also providing the ability to rapidly terminate administration of the drug. Heretofore, drug administration via injection has not typically been able to provide rapid establishment and long-term maintenance (e.g., three months or more) of steady-state drug delivery and, even if that were possible, treatment using drugs administered by injection (e.g., drugs formulated for prolonged delivery) has not been able to be rapidly terminated. The present invention also provides for enhanced tolerization of subjects to drug dose escalation relative to dose escalation performed by administration of drug by injection.

The clinical challenges encountered with long-term pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes include hypoglycemia, weight gain, and side effects and aversion to self-injection, which often contribute to poor adherence and persistence with therapy. Poor adherence and persistence with antidiabetic therapy are common; a systematic review of the literature reported that adherence rates to oral drugs ranged from 36% to 93% and for insulin was approximately 60%, and a recent report found discontinuation rates >80% with Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs; a class of drug for treating type 2 diabetes) at 12 months. An evaluation of persistence with injectable antidiabetic agents, including insulin and an exenatide, found that only 28.7% of patients persisted with therapy to 1 year. Much of this non-adherence may be because of the inconvenience and discomfort associated with injectable antidiabetic drugs. The consequences of poor adherence include inadequate glycemic control, increased morbidity and mortality, impacts on the benefit/risk ratio of a drug and overall tolerability, and markedly increased healthcare costs. Many interventions have been studied and recommended to increase medication adherence, but most require extensive and continuous use of costly healthcare resources, and the beneficial effects on adherence are temporary. These concerns about poor compliance and adherence are abrogated by the use of an osmotic delivery device and formulations useful in the present invention.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to improved methods of treating diseases or conditions in subjects in need of treatment, wherein the methods of the invention provide rapid establishment and/or rapid termination of substantial steady-state drug delivery. Further, the present invention relates to methods of escalating drug dose that provide improved tolerization of subjects to increased drug dose levels relative to dose escalation by standard drug injection methods. Preferred subjects for the methods of the present invention are humans.

The present invention relates to methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. The subject is in need of treatment for type 2 diabetes. The subject has a baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) % of greater than 6.5%. The subject may have a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10.0%. The subject may not have previously received a drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. The subject may have a baseline HbA1c % of less than or equal to 12%.

The methods comprise providing continuous delivery of an insulinotrophic peptide from an osmotic delivery device to the subject, wherein substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide at a therapeutic concentration is achieved within a time period up to about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, e.g., subcutaneously and/or subdermally. Thus, steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide occurs at any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation; non-limiting examples include 1 hour after implantation, 18 hours after implantation, 2 and a half days after implantation, and five days after implantation. In some embodiments of the invention, the substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide at therapeutic concentrations is achieved after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject within a time period selected from the group consisting of about 6 days, about 5 days, about 4 days, about 3 days, about 2 days, and about 1 day. The substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the osmotic delivery device is typically continuous over an administration period of at least about 1 month, e.g., at least about 1 month, at least about 2 months, and at least about 3 months.

The substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period of, for example, at least about 1 month to about two years, at least about 2 months to about two years, at least about 3 months to about two years, at least about 4 months to about two years, at least about 5 months to about two years, at least about 6 months to about two years, at least about 8 months to about two years, or at least about 9 months to about two years, about 1 year, at least one year to about two years, at least about 14 months to about two years, at least about 16 months to about two years, at least 18 months to about two years, at least about 20 months to about two years, at least about 22 months to about two years, and about two years.

The substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period selected from the group consisting of at least about 12 months to about 18 months, at least about 13 months to about 18 months, at least about 14 months to about 18 months, at least about 15 months to about 18 months, at least about 16 months to about 18 months, at least about 17 months to about 18 months, and about 18 months.

The substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period selected from the group consisting of at least about 1 month to about a year, at least about 2 months to about a year, about 3 months, at least about 3 months to about a year, at least about 4 months to about a year, at least about 5 months to about a year, about 6 months, at least about 6 months to about a year, at least about 8 months to about a year, about 9 months, at least about 9 months to about a year, at least about 10 months to about a year, at least about 11 months to about a year, and about a year.

The continuous delivery can, for example, be zero-order, controlled continuous delivery.

The methods can further comprise providing a significant decrease in the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, relative to the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration before implantation of the osmotic delivery device. The decrease is typically obtained within, for example, about 7 days, about 6 days, about 5 days, about 4 days, about 3 days, about 2 days, and about 1 day. Normally, a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose is maintained over the administration period. Thus, a subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration will initially decrease within any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation.

The methods can further comprise providing a significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, relative to the subject's HbA1c % before implantation of the osmotic delivery device. The decrease is typically achieved within about six weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device (e.g., within about five weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about four weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about three weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about two weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, or within about one week after implantation of the osmotic delivery device). The significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % is maintained over the administration period.

The methods can further provide a decrease in a subject's HbA1c % over the administration period of at least about 0.5%, at least about 1.0%, at least about 1.5%, at least about 2.0%, at least about 2.5%, at least about 3.0%, at least about 3.5%, at least about 4.0%, at least about 4.5%, at least about 5.0%, at least about 5.5%, or at least about 6.0% from baseline over the administration period or a reduction in the amount of HbA1c in the subject's serum of at least about 35 percent, at least about 40 percent, at least about 45 percent, at least about 50 percent, or at least about 55 percent at the end of an administration period relative to the beginning of the administration period.

Also, in any of the methods provided herein, termination of the continuous delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) produces a serum concentration of the insulinotrophic peptide that is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject within about 6 half-lives, about 5 half-lives, about 4 half-lives, or about 3 half-lives of the insulinotrophic peptide after termination of continuous delivery. Thus, the insulinotrophic peptide will be substantially undetectable in a subject's blood sample within any time point after termination of continuous delivery and up to about 6 half-lives after termination of continuous delivery. Termination of the continuous delivery produces a serum concentration of the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) that is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject after termination of continuous delivery within a number of hours selected from the group consisting of about 72 hours, about 48 hours, about 24, about 18 hours, about 14 hours, about 12 hours, about 10 hours, about 8 hours, about 6 hours, and about 4 hours. Thus, the insulinotrophic peptide will be substantially undetectable in a subject's blood sample within any time point after termination of continuous delivery and up to about 72 hours after termination of continuous delivery. In some embodiments, continuous delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide is terminated by removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject. The serum concentration of the insulinotrophic peptide is, for example, detected by a radioimmunoassay (RIA), a chromatographic method, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or an immunoenzymatic sandwich assay (IEMA).

Osmotic delivery devices for use in the methods of the present invention can comprise the components described herein including, but not limited to, a reservoir, a semi-permeable membrane, an osmotic engine, a piston, a suspension formulation, and a diffusion moderator. In some embodiments, the osmotic delivery device comprises: an impermeable reservoir comprising interior and exterior surfaces and first and second open ends; a semi-permeable membrane in sealing relationship with the first open end of the reservoir; an osmotic engine within the reservoir and adjacent the semi-permeable membrane; a piston adjacent the osmotic engine, wherein the piston forms a movable seal with the interior surface of the reservoir, the piston divides the reservoir into a first chamber and a second chamber, the first chamber comprising the osmotic engine; a suspension formulation, wherein the second chamber comprises the suspension formulation and the suspension formulation is flowable. The osmotic delivery device comprises a diffusion moderator inserted in the second open end of the reservoir, the diffusion moderator adjacent the suspension formulation. In some embodiments, the reservoir comprises titanium or a titanium alloy.

Suspension formulations used in the methods of the present invention typically comprise a particle formulation comprising a therapeutic agent (e.g., an insulinotrophic peptide, preferably, an exenatide) and a vehicle formulation.

A vehicle formulation comprises a solvent (e.g., benzyl benzoate, lauryl lactate, and lauryl alcohol) and a polymer (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone: also herein referred to as PVP, polyvidone, and povidone). Preferably, the polymer is polyvinylpyrrolidone. The vehicle formulation may have a viscosity of between about 10,000 poise and about 20,000 poise at 37° C.

Examples of insulinotrophic peptides useful in the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, native exendin-4, exenatide peptides, exenatide peptide analogs, exenatide peptide derivatives, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), GLP-1 peptides, GLP-1 peptide analogs, or GLP-1 peptide derivatives. Examples of preferred insulinotrophic peptides include the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of the native exendin-4 (SEQ ID NO: 1), exenatide-LAR, lixisenatide, GLP-1(7-36), liraglutide, dulaglutide, albiglutide, and taspoglutide. Short-acting insulinotrophic peptides (2-5 hours) include the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 (e.g., BYETTA®) and lixisenatide and long-acting insulinotrophic peptides include liraglutide, dulaglutide, albiglutide, and exenatide-LAR.

An insulinotrophic peptide can be included in a particle formulation, in a suspension formulation, and/or in a single osmotic delivery device along with one or more (e.g., one, two, three, four, or more) other therapeutic agents; thus, an osmotic delivery device may provide substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide and one or more other therapeutic agents. Non-limiting examples of the one or more other therapeutic agents include amylin, an amylin analogue (e.g., pramlintide), a ghrelin antagonist, a G protein coupled receptor 119 (GRP 119) agonist, and leptin. An osmotic delivery device may provide substantial steady-state delivery of two or more insulinotrophic peptides.

Particles of a particle formulation comprising an insulinotrophic peptide have diameters of between about 2 microns to about 150 micron, e.g., less than 150 microns in diameter, less than 100 microns in diameter, less than 50 microns in diameter, less than 30 microns in diameter, less than 10 microns in diameter, less than 5 microns in diameter, and about 2 microns in diameter. When the insulinotrophic peptide is an exenatide, particles have diameters of between about 2 microns and about 50 microns.

In some methods, continuous delivery provides to the subject a μg/day dose (also referenced to herein as a mcg/day dose) of an insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) selected from the group consisting of about 10 μg/day, about 15 μg/day, about 20 μg/day, about 30 μg/day, about 40 μg/day, about 50 μg/day, about 60 μg/day, about 70 μg/day, and about 80 μg/day. The upper limit to the daily dose depends to the peptide/active agent and the total capacity of the device itself. A skilled artisan would be able to determine a suitable dose (with regards to safety and efficacy) for a specific insulinotrophic peptide. Thus, the daily dose may exceed 80 μg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the insulinotrophic peptide is about 20 mcg/day. More preferably, the insulinotrophic peptide is an exenatide and the mcg/day dose is about 20 mcg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the insulinotrophic peptide is about 40 mcg/day. More preferably, the insulinotrophic peptide is an exenatide and the mcg/day dose is about 40 mcg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the insulinotrophic peptide is about 60 mcg/day. More preferably, the insulinotrophic peptide is an exenatide and the mcg/day dose is about 60 mcg/day.

Some methods further comprise a first continuous administration period of the insulinotrophic peptide at a first μg/day dose that is followed by a second continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the insulinotrophic peptide to a second μg/day dose, wherein the second μg/day dose is greater than the first μg/day dose. The first μg/day dose is, for example, delivered by a first osmotic delivery device and the second μg/day dose is delivered by an, at least, second osmotic delivery device. Delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the first osmotic delivery device is continuous over the administration period of at least about 1 month, e.g., at least about 1 month, at least about 2 months, and at least about 3 months. Delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the at least second osmotic delivery device is continuous over the administration period of at least about 1 month, e.g., at least about 1 month, at least about 2 months, and at least about 3 months. In one embodiment, the second μg/day dose is at least two times greater than the first μg/day dose. The method can further comprise at least one more continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the insulinotrophic peptide to a higher μg/day dose relative to the second μg/day dose. In some embodiments, the method further comprises at least one more continuous administration period, subsequent to the second continuous administration period, providing a dose at the same mcg/day dose as the second mcg/day dose. Dose escalation allows a subject to receive a therapeutic benefit while being gradually exposed to the insulinotrophic peptide. This tolerizes the subject to the insulinotrophic peptide and reduces the incidence of side effects. Later, once the subject has completed an initial tolerization period with a first, low daily dose, the dose is escalated to a maintenance dose.

Exemplary dose escalations for the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) are as follows: about 10 μg/day followed by about 20 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 20 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 60 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day or about 60 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day.

Preferably, the first mcg/day dose of the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is about 20 mcg/day followed by about 40 mcg/day.

Preferably, the first mcg/day dose of the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is about 20 mcg/day followed by about 60 mcg/day.

In some methods of the present invention, the subject has not previously received a drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.

In any of the above-described methods, the insulinotrophic peptide may comprise GLP-1 or an incretin mimetic selected the group consisting of a GLP-1 peptide, a peptide analog of GLP-1, or a peptide derivative of GLP-1, an exenatide (which includes the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, native exendin-4, an exenatide peptide, a peptide analog of exenatide, and a peptide derivative of exenatide). In any of the above methods, the insulinotrophic peptide is selected from the group consisting of lixisenatide, liraglutide, albiglutide, and taspoglutide.

In any of the above-described methods, the subject may further be provided one or more other drugs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, e.g., insulin and/or oral anti-diabetic drugs including, without limitation, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs).

Any of the above-described methods further promote weight loss in a subject in need thereof. Preferably, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5%. More preferably, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10.0%. The subject may have a baseline HbA1c % of less than or equal to 12%. Significant weight loss is achieved by about six weeks (e.g., about five weeks, about four weeks, about three weeks, about two weeks, and about one week) after initial implantation of the osmotic delivery device and up to 39 weeks after initial implantation.

The present invention relates to methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus comprising providing continuous delivery of an exenatide from an osmotic delivery device to the subject. The subject is in need of treatment for type 2 diabetes. The subject has a baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) % of greater than 6.5%. The subject may have a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10.0%. The subject may not have previously received a drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. The subject may have a baseline HbA1c % of less than or equal to 12%.

Substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide at a therapeutic concentration is achieved within a time period up to about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, e.g., subcutaneously and/or subdermally. Thus, steady-state delivery of the exenatide occurs at any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation; non-limiting examples include 1 hour after implantation, 18 hours after implantation, 2 and a half days after implantation, and five days after implantation. In some embodiments of the invention, the substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide at therapeutic concentrations is achieved after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject within a time period selected from the group consisting of about 6 days, about 5 days, about 4 days, about 3 days, about 2 days, and about 1 day. The substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide from the osmotic delivery device is typically continuous over an administration period of at least about 1 month, e.g., at least about 1 month, at least about 2 months, and at least about 3 months.

The substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period of, for example, at least about 1 month to about two years, at least about 2 months to about two years, at least about 3 months to about two years, at least about 4 months to about two years, at least about 5 months to about two years, at least about 6 months to about two years, at least about 8 months to about two years, or at least about 9 months to about two years, about 1 year, at least one year to about two years, at least about 14 months to about two years, at least about 16 months to about two years, at least 18 months to about two years, at least about 20 months to about two years, at least about 22 months to about two years, and about two years.

The substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period selected from the group consisting of at least about 12 months to about 18 months, at least about 13 months to about 18 months, at least about 14 months to about 18 months, at least about 15 months to about 18 months, at least about 16 months to about 18 months, at least about 17 months to about 18 months, and about 18 months.

The substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period selected from the group consisting of at least about 1 month to about a year, at least about 2 months to about a year, about 3 months, at least about 3 months to about a year, at least about 4 months to about a year, at least about 5 months to about a year, about 6 months, at least about 6 months to about a year, at least about 8 months to about a year, about 9 months, at least about 9 months to about a year, at least about 10 months to about a year, at least about 11 months to about a year, and about a year.

The continuous delivery can, for example, be zero-order, controlled continuous delivery.

The methods can further comprise providing a significant decrease in the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, relative to the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration before implantation of the osmotic delivery device. The decrease is typically obtained within, for example, about 7 days, about 6 days, about 5 days, about 4 days, about 3 days, about 2 days, and about 1 day. Normally, a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose is maintained over the administration period. Thus, a subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration will initially decrease within any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation.

The methods can further comprise providing a significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, relative to the subject's HbA1c % before implantation of the osmotic delivery device. The decrease is typically achieved within about six weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device (e.g., within about five weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about four weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about three weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about two weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, or within about one week after implantation of the osmotic delivery device). The significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % is maintained over the administration period.

The methods can further provide a decrease in a subject's HbA1c % over the administration period of at least about 0.5%, at least about 1.0%, at least about 1.5%, at least about 2.0%, at least about 2.5%, at least about 3.0%, at least about 3.5%, at least about 4.0%, at least about 4.5%, at least about 5.0%, at least about 5.5%, or at least about 6.0% from baseline over the administration period or a reduction in the amount of HbA1c in the subject's serum of at least about 35 percent, at least about 40 percent, at least about 45 percent, at least about 50 percent, or at least about 55 percent at the end of an administration period relative to the beginning of the administration period.

Also, in any of the methods provided herein, termination of the continuous delivery of the exenatide produces a serum concentration of the exenatide that is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject within about 6 half-lives, about 5 half-lives, about 4 half-lives, or about 3 half-lives of the exenatide after termination of continuous delivery. Thus, the exenatide will be substantially undetectable in a subject's blood sample within any time point after termination of continuous delivery and up to about 6 half-lives after termination of continuous delivery. Termination of the continuous delivery produces a serum concentration of the exenatide that is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject after termination of continuous delivery within a number of hours selected from the group consisting of about 72 hours, about 48 hours, about 24, about 14 hours, about 12 hours, about 10 hours, about 8 hours, about 6 hours, and about 4 hours. Thus, the exenatide will be substantially undetectable in a subject's blood sample within any time point after termination of continuous delivery and up to about 72 hours after termination of continuous delivery. In some embodiments, continuous delivery of the exenatide is terminated by removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject. The serum concentration of the exenatide is, for example, detected by a radioimmunoassay (RIA), a chromatographic method, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or an immunoenzymatic sandwich assay (IEMA).

Osmotic delivery devices used in the methods of the present invention can comprise the components described herein including, but not limited to, a reservoir, a semi-permeable membrane, an osmotic engine, a piston, a suspension formulation, and a diffusion moderator. In some embodiments, the osmotic delivery device comprises: an impermeable reservoir comprising interior and exterior surfaces and first and second open ends; a semi-permeable membrane in sealing relationship with the first open end of the reservoir; an osmotic engine within the reservoir and adjacent the semi-permeable membrane; a piston adjacent the osmotic engine, wherein the piston forms a movable seal with the interior surface of the reservoir, the piston divides the reservoir into a first chamber and a second chamber, the first chamber comprising the osmotic engine; a suspension formulation, wherein the second chamber comprises the suspension formulation and the suspension formulation is flowable. The osmotic delivery device comprises a diffusion moderator inserted in the second open end of the reservoir, the diffusion moderator adjacent the suspension formulation. In some embodiments, the reservoir comprises titanium or a titanium alloy.

Suspension formulations used in methods of the present invention typically comprise a particle formulation comprise an exenatide and a vehicle formulation.

A vehicle formulation comprises a solvent (e.g., benzyl benzoate, lauryl lactate, and lauryl alcohol) and a polymer (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone: also herein referred to as PVP, polyvidone, and povidone). Preferably, the polymer is polyvinylpyrrolidone. The vehicle formulation may have a viscosity of between about 10,000 poise and about 20,000 poise at 37° C.

Examples of exenatides useful in the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, exenatide peptides, exenatide peptide analogs, exenatide peptide derivatives, the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of the native exendin-4 (SEQ ID NO: 1), native exendin-4, exenatide-LAR, and lixisenatide. Short-acting exenatides (2-5 hours) include the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 (e.g., BYETTA®) and lixisenatide and long-acting exenatides include liraglutide and exenatide-LAR.

An exenatide can be included in a particle formulation, in a suspension formulation, and/or in a single osmotic delivery device along with one or more (e.g., one, two, three, four, or more) other therapeutic agents; thus, an osmotic delivery device may provide substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide and one or more other therapeutic agents. Non-limiting examples of the one or more other therapeutic agents include amylin, an amylin analogue (e.g., pramlintide), a ghrelin antagonist, a G protein coupled receptor 119 (GRP 119) agonist, and leptin. An osmotic delivery device may provide substantial steady-state delivery of two or more exenatides.

Particles of a particle formulation comprising an exenatide have diameters of between about 2 microns to about 150 micron, e.g., less than 150 microns in diameter, less than 100 microns in diameter, less than 50 microns in diameter, less than 30 microns in diameter, less than 10 microns in diameter, less than 5 microns in diameter, and about 2 microns in diameter. Preferably, particles have diameters of between about 2 microns and about 50 microns.

In some methods, continuous delivery provides to the subject a μg/day dose of the exenatide selected from the group consisting of about 10 μg/day, about 15 μg/day, about 20 μg/day, about 30 μg/day, about 40 μg/day, about 50 μg/day, about 60 μg/day, about 70 μg/day, and about 80 μg/day. The upper limit to the daily dose depends to the peptide/active agent and the total capacity of the device itself. Thus, the daily dose may exceed 80 μg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the exenatide is about 20 mcg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the exenatide is about 40 mcg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the exenatide is about 60 mcg/day.

Some methods further comprise a first continuous administration period of the exenatide at a first μg/day dose that is followed by a second continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the exenatide to a second μg/day dose, wherein the second μg/day dose is greater than the first μg/day dose. The first μg/day dose is, for example, delivered by a first osmotic delivery device and the second μg/day dose is delivered by an, at least, second osmotic delivery device. Delivery of the exenatide from the first osmotic delivery device is continuous over the administration period of at least about 1 month, e.g., at least about 1 month, at least about 2 months, and at least about 3 months. Delivery of the exenatide from the at least second osmotic delivery device is continuous over the administration period of at least about 1 month, e.g., at least about 1 month, at least about 2 months, and at least about 3 months. In one embodiment, the second μg/day dose is at least two times greater than the first μg/day dose. The method can further comprise at least one more continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the exenatide to a higher μg/day dose relative to the second μg/day dose. In some embodiments, the method further comprises at least one more continuous administration period, subsequent to the second continuous administration period, providing a dose at the same mcg/day dose as the second mcg/day dose. Dose escalation allows a subject to receive a therapeutic benefit while being gradually exposed to the exenatide. This tolerizes the subject to the exenatide and reduces the incidence of side effects. Later, once the subject has completed an initial tolerization period with a first, low daily dose, the dose is escalated to a maintenance dose.

Exemplary dose escalations for the exenatide are as follows: about 10 μg/day followed by about 20 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 20 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 60 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day or about 60 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day.

Preferably, the first mcg/day dose of the exenatide followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is about 20 mcg/day followed by about 40 mcg/day.

Preferably, the first mcg/day dose of the exenatide followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is about 20 mcg/day followed by about 60 mcg/day.

In some methods of the present invention, the subject has not previously received a drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.

In any of the above methods, the exenatide may be the exenatide having the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, natural exendin-4, an exenatide peptide, a peptide analog of exenatide, a peptide derivative of exenatide, lixisenatide, or exenatide-LAR.

In any of the above methods, the subject may further be provided one or more other drugs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, e.g., insulin and/or oral anti-diabetic drugs including, without limitation, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs).

Any of the above-described methods further promote weight loss in a subject in need thereof. Preferably, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5%. More preferably, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10.0%. The subject may have a baseline HbA1c % of less than or equal to 12%. Significant weight loss is achieved by about six weeks (e.g., about five weeks, about four weeks, about three weeks, about two weeks, and about one week) after initial implantation of the osmotic delivery device and up to 39 weeks after initial implantation.

The present invention also relates to a method of treating a disease or condition in a subject in need of treatment. The method comprises providing continuous delivery of a drug from an osmotic delivery device.

In the above-described invention, an exenatide for use in a method of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus in a subject is provided.

In the above-described invention, provided is the use of an exenatide in the manufacture of a medicament for use in a method of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus in a subject.

In the above-described invention, the use of an exenatide in the manufacture of an osmotic delivery device, as described herein, for use in a method of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus in a subject is provided.

These and other embodiments of the present invention will readily occur to those of ordinary skill in the art in view of the disclosure herein.

Any of the above aspects and embodiments can be combined with any other aspect or embodiment as disclosed herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 presents an overview of the 39-week phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ITCA 650 in patients with type 2 diabetes described in Example 1.

FIG. 2 is a graph showing decreases in HbA1c % relative to baseline at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) endpoint for subjects in the mITT population in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and a baseline HbA1c % pursuant to the study protocol inclusion criterion. The average decreases for the two treatments groups relative to placebo were statistically significant. Baseline values are represented by the left bars and values at LOCF endpoint are represented by the right bars. “20/40” indicates that subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day at week 39; “20/60” indicates that subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day at week 39 (“20/60”). Baseline is defined as the last assessment on or before the day of the initial placement of an ITCA 650 osmotic delivery device (containing drug or placebo).

FIG. 3 is a graph showing progressive decreases in bodyweight from baseline by visit for subjects in the mITT population described in Example 1. Subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for the first 13 weeks followed by either ITCA 650 40 μg/day for the following 26 weeks (“ITCA 40 mcg/day” or “40 mcg/day”; data are identified with closed squares) or ITCA 650 60 μg/day for the following 26 weeks (“ITCA 60 mcg/day” or “60 mcg/day”; data are identified with closed triangles). Data for placebo subjects are identified with closed circles.

FIG. 4 is a graph showing percentage decreases in bodyweight from baseline by visit for the mITT population described in Example 1. Subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for the first 13 weeks followed by either ITCA 650 40 μg/day for the following 26 weeks (“ITCA 40 mcg/day” or “40 mcg/day”; data identified with closed squares) or ITCA 650 60 μg/day for the following 26 weeks (“ITCA 60 mcg/day” or “60 mcg/day”; data identified with closed triangles). Data for placebo subjects are identified with closed circles.

FIG. 5 is a graph showing changes in body weight (kg) from baseline by visit to week 39 for subjects in the mITT population described in Example 1. Subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for the first 13 weeks followed by either ITCA 650 40 μg/day for the following 26 weeks (“ITCA 40 mcg/day” or “40 mcg/day”; data identified with closed squares) or ITCA 650 60 μg/day for the following 26 weeks (“ITCA 60 mcg/day” or “60 mcg/day”; data identified with closed triangles). Data for placebo subjects are identified with closed circles. Data is presented for subjects who received the entire 39 week treatment.

FIG. 6 is a graph showing decreases in body weight relative to baseline at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) endpoint for subjects in the mITT population in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and a baseline HbA1c % pursuant to the study protocol inclusion criterion. The average decreases for the two treatments groups relative to placebo was statistically significant. Baseline values are represented by the left bars and values at 39 weeks are represented by the right bars. “ITCA 650 40 mcg/day” or “40 mcg/d” indicates that subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks; “ITCA 650 60 mcg/day” or “60 mcg/d” indicates that subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks.

FIG. 7 is a graph showing decreases in HbA1c % relative to baseline at LOCF endpoint for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and a baseline HbA1c % of ≤10% in the mITT population who received background metformin monotherapy. Subjects in the “ITCA 650 40 mcg/day” or “40 mcg/d” group were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks; subjects in the “ITCA 650 60 mcg/day” or “60 mcg/d” group were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks. Baseline HbA1c percentages are represented by the left bars and HbA1c percentages at LOCF endpoint are represented by the right bars.

FIG. 8 is a graph showing decreases in HbA1c % relative to baseline at LOCF endpoint for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and a baseline HbA1c % of ≤10% in the mITT population who received background metformin and sulfonylurea combination therapy. Subjects in the “ITCA 650 40 mcg/day” or “40 mcg/d” group were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks; subjects in the “ITCA 650 60 mcg/day” or “60 mcg/d” group were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks. Baseline HbA1c percentages are represented by the left bars and HbA1c percentages at LOCF endpoint are represented by the right bars.

FIG. 9 is a graph showing changes from baseline HbA1c (%) at LOCF endpoint for subjects in the mITT population on diet and exercise therapy only (i.e., no concomitant oral antidiabetic treatment). Left bars show baseline values and right bars show values at LOCF endpoint. Subjects in the “ITCA 650 40 mcg/day” or “40 mcg/d” group were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks; subjects in the “ITCA 650 60 mcg/day” or “60 mcg/d” group were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks.

FIG. 10 is a graph showing decreases in HbA1c % relative to baseline at week 6, week 13, week 19, week 26, week 32, and week 39 for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and a baseline HbA1c % of ≥7.5% to ≤10%. Data identified with closed squares are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks (“40 mcg/day”), data identified with closed triangles are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“60 mcg/day”), and data identified with closed circles are from subjects treated with a placebo.

FIG. 11 is a graph showing decreases in HbA1c % relative to baseline at week 6, week 13, week 26, and week 39 for subjects in the phase 3 trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and with baseline Hb1A1c % of ≤8.5%. Left bars are data from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 40 mcg/day”), middle bars are data from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 60 mcg/day”), and right bars are data from subjects treated with a placebo.

FIG. 12 is a graph showing decreases in HbA1c % relative to baseline at week 6, week 13, week 26, and week 39 for subjects in the phase 3 trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and with baseline Hb1A1c % of >8.5% (and ≤10%). Left bars are data from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 40 mcg/day”), middle bars are data from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 60 mcg/day”), and right bars are data from subjects treated with a placebo.

FIG. 13 is a graph showing changes in HbA1c % over time for subjects in the phase 3 trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and with baseline Hb1A1c % of >8.5% (and ≤10%) who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day”). Data is separated for subjects who were treated with sulfonylurea (SU) and subjects who were not treated with SU. Data shown in a solid line and identified with closed circles are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day and SU, data shown in a solid line and identified with closed squares are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day but not SU, and data shown in a solid line and identified with closed triangles is from all subjects from the ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day groups. Data shown in a dotted line and identified closed squares are from placebo subjects treated with SU and not with ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day, data shown in a dotted line and identified with closed circles are from placebo subjects not treated with either SU or ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day, and data shown in a dotted line and identified with closed triangle are from all placebo subjects.

FIG. 14 is a graph showing changes in HbA1c % over time for subjects in the phase 3 trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and with baseline Hb1A1c % of >8.5% (and ≤10%) who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day”). Data is separated for subjects who were treated with sulfonylurea (SU) and subjects who were not treated with SU. Data shown in a solid line identified with closed circles are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day and SU, data shown in a solid line and identified with closed squares are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day but not SU, and data shown in a solid line and identified with closed triangles are from all subjects from the ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day groups. Data shown in a dotted line and identified with closed squares are from placebo subjects treated with SU and not with ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day, data shown in a dotted line and identified with closed circles are from placebo subjects not treated with either SU or ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day, and data shown in a dotted line and identified with closed triangles is from all placebo subjects.

FIG. 15 includes a graph showing changes in HbA1c % at the 39^(th) week for subjects in the phase 3 trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and with baseline Hb1A1c % of >8.5% (and ≤10%) who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 40 mcg/day”), who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 60 mcg/day”), or received a placebo ITCA treatment. Data is separated for subjects who were treated with sulfonylurea (SU), shown in right bards, and subjects who were not treated with SU, shown in left bards.

FIG. 16 is a graph showing changes in HbA1c % at week 39 from baseline for subjects in mITT population for subjects in the phase 3 trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes. Subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks (“40 MCG/DAY HBA1C”) or were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“60 MCG/DAY HBA1C”). Data is separated for subjects (data in right bars) who had a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 8.5% (and less than or equal to 10.0%) and by subjects (data in left bars) who had a baseline HbA1c % of less than or equal to 8.5%.

FIG. 17 is a graph showing the incidence of nausea by study period for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and with a baseline HbA1c % pursuant to the study protocol inclusion criterion. Data identified with closed circles are from subjects who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 40 mcg/day”), data identified with closed triangles are from subjects who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 60 mcg/day”), and data identified by closed circles are from subjects treated with a placebo.

FIG. 18 is a graph showing the incidence of nausea for subjects in a phase 2 clinical trial (described in Henry et al 2014) and the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and with a baseline HbA1c % pursuant to the study protocol inclusion criterion. Data identified with closed circles are from placebo subjects in the phase 3 trial, data identified with closed squares are from subjects in the phase 3 trial who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 12 weeks and then treated with ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks (“40 mcg/d”), data identified with closed triangles are from subjects in the phase 3 trial who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 12 weeks and then treated with ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“60 mcg/d”), and data identified with open circles are for subjects in the phase 2 trial who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 12 weeks and then treated with ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 12 weeks (“60 mcg/d (Phase 2 Data)”).

FIG. 19 is a table that compares certain endpoint data for subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with ITCA 650 60 μg/day (“20/60”) or ITCA 650 40 μg/day (“20/40”) in the phase 3 trial described in Example 1 and with a baseline HbA1c % pursuant to the study protocol inclusion criterion.

FIG. 20 is a table that compares subject profiles for those subjects participating in the phase 3 study described in Example 1 who have type 2 diabetes and a baseline HbA1c % of ≤10% and those subjects participating in the Duration 6 Trial.

FIG. 21 is a graph showing progressive decreases in HbA1c % from baseline for subjects in the Duration 6 Trial and in the phase 3 clinical trial for subjects who have type 2 diabetes and a baseline HbA1c % of pursuant to the study protocol inclusion criterion as described in Example 1. Data identified with closed circles are for subjects who received once-daily injections of liraglutide (1.8 mg) and data identified with closed squares are for subjects who received once-weekly exenatide (2 mg) injections in a published study Duration-6 (Buse et al., The Lancet, Volume 381, Issue 9861, 12-18 January, pages 117-124). Data identified with closed triangles were obtained here for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 and who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 20/60 mcg per day mITT”); this data was not included in the Duration 6 Trial or in a separate comparison study between Duration 6 methods and methods described in Example 1.

FIG. 22 is a graph showing progressive decreases in bodyweight from baseline for subjects in the Duration 6 Trial. Data identified with a closed square are for subjects who received once-daily injections of liraglutide (1.8 mg) and data identified closed circles are for subjects who received once-weekly exenatide (2 mg) injections. Data identified by a closed plus sign were obtained here for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 who were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 20/60 mcg”); this data was not included in the Duration 6 Trial or in a separate comparison study between Duration 6 methods and methods described in Example 1. Data (closed plus sign) for the above-described phase 3 trial is only shown for week 39.

FIG. 23 is a table that compares rates of adverse events for subjects in the Duration 6 study and for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 (“ITCA 650 20/60 mcg”).

FIG. 24 presents an overview of a 39-week open-label initial phase of the randomized, phase 3 study for subjects with type 2 diabetes and with high baseline HbA1c as described in Example 2.

FIG. 25 is a graph showing the average change from baseline HbA1c % by visit for the mITT population with a high baseline HbA1c described in Example 2. Subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for the first 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for the following 26 weeks (“60 mcg/day”).

FIG. 26 is a graph showing decreases in body weight relative to baseline at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) endpoint for subjects in the mITT population in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 2 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and a high baseline HbA1c % pursuant to the study protocol inclusion criterion. Subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for the first 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 60 mcg/day”). The reduction in body weight from baseline to week 39 was statistically significant. Mean body weight baseline value is represented by the left bar and mean body weight value at LOCF endpoint is represented by the right bar.

FIG. 27 is a graph showing the incidence of nausea by study period for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 2 for subjects with type 2 diabetes and with a high baseline HbA1c % pursuant to the study protocol inclusion criterion. Subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks (“ITCA 650 60 mcg/day”).

FIG. 28 is a graph showing changes in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) over time for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects in the Safety Population with type 2 diabetes and with a baseline HbA1c % pursuant to the study protocol inclusion criterion. Data identified with closed circles are from placebo subjects, data identified with closed squares are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks, and data identified with closed triangles are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks.

FIG. 29 is a graph showing changes in mean FPG over time for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects in the mITT Population with type 2 diabetes and with a baseline HbA1c % pursuant to the study protocol inclusion criterion. Data identified with closed circles are from placebo subjects, data identified with closed squares are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks, and data identified with closed triangles are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks.

FIG. 30 is a graph showing percentages of patients reaching an HbA1c target of less than 7% or less than 6.5% at week 39 for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects in the mITT Population. Data in the left bars are from placebo subjects, data in the middle bars are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks, and data in the right bars are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks.

FIG. 31 is a graph showing percentages of patients who experienced a greater than 5% decrease in weight loss or who experienced a greater than or equal to 3 kilogram weight loss for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects in the mITT Population. Data is divided by Exenatide dose. Data in the left bars are from placebo subjects, data in the middle bars are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 40 μg/day for 26 weeks, and data in the right bars are from subjects treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for 26 weeks.

FIG. 32 is a graph showing mean changes in HbA1c % for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects in the mITT Population. Data is divided by Exenatide dose and for patients having a baseline HbA1c % of less than or equal to 8.5% (left bars) or greater than 8.5% and ≤10% (right bars).

FIG. 33 is a graph showing mean changes in HbA1c % and Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) from baseline for subjects in the phase 3 clinical trial described in Example 1 for subjects in the mITT Population.

FIG. 34 presents an overview of the open-label initial phase with 39 weeks of treatment and the first 26-week extension phase (“first extension phase” or “extension phase 1”) for subjects with type 2 diabetes and with high baseline HbA1c as described in Example 2.

FIG. 35 is a graph showing the relative change from baseline in HbA1c (%) at LOCF endpoint for mITT populations in the original 39 week study phase of this phase 3 open-label trial and in the first extension phase of this phase 3 trial (up to 65 weeks), respectively. Average baseline HbA1c (%) value is represented by the left, average HbA1c (%) value at 39 weeks for subjects treated with ITCA 650 60 mcg/day are represented by the middle bar, and average HbA1c (%) value at 65 weeks for subjects treated with ITCA 650 60 mcg/day are represented by the right bar. “ITCA 650 60 mcg/day” indicates that subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 μg/day for 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 μg/day for up to 26 weeks (week 39) or for an additional 26 weeks (up to week 65).

FIG. 36 is a graph showing the relative change from baseline in HbA1c (%) at LOCF endpoint by visit for mITT population who participated in the first extension phase of the phase 3 trial (up to 65 weeks). Average decreases for subjects relative to placebo were clinically and statistically significant at every study visit throughout the trial. Subjects were treated with ITCA 650 20 mcg/day for the first 13 weeks followed by ITCA 650 60 mcg/day for the following 52 weeks (“60 mcg/day”).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

All patents, publications, and patent applications cited in this specification are herein incorporated by reference as if each individual patent, publication, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

A subject in need thereof may have a baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) % of greater than greater than 6.5%. Preferably, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10.0%, e.g., at least about 10.01%, at least about 10.1%, at least about 10.5%, at least about 11.0%, at least about 11.5%, at least about 11.9%, and about 12.0% prior to administration of the pharmaceutical composition. A subject with an HbA1c % of greater than about 10% is referred to herein as a high baseline (HBL) subject. Methods and uses according to the present invention may comprise a step of selecting a subject, including a subject who is a high baseline subject, prior to treatment, or prior to continued treatment, with an insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide). Methods and uses according to the present invention may comprise a step of determining, e.g., in vitro, the percentage HbA1c in a subject's blood, e.g., in a blood sample, and optionally selecting a subject determined to be a high baseline subject for treatment with an exenatide.

In some embodiments, the subject's serum HbA1c % is decreased by at least about 0.5%, at least about 1.0%, at least about 1.5%, or at least about 2.0% from baseline over the administration period. In other embodiments, the subject's HbA1c level is decreased by at least about 2.5%, at least about 3.0%, at least about 3.5%, at least about 4.0%, at least about 4.5%, at least about 5.0%, at least about 5.5%, or at least about 6.0% from baseline over the administration period. For example, when the subject's HbA1c % decreases from 11.4% to 7.4%, this is a 4% decrease.

In some embodiments, the amount of HbA1c in the subject's serum is at least about 35 percent less (i.e., reduced) at the end of an administration period relative to the beginning of the administration period. In certain other embodiments, the amount of HbA1 in the subject's serum is at least about 40 percent, at least about 45 percent, at least about 50 percent, or at least about 55 percent less at the end of an administration period relative to at the beginning of the administration period. For example, the subject's HbA1c % reduces from 11.4% to about 7.4%, which is a 35 percent reduction.

In some embodiments, the present invention is directed to methods of treating diabetes in patients having baseline HbA1c levels of greater than 6.5% or greater than 10%, by administering a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutical exenatide composition from an implanted osmotic delivery device over an administration period. The administration may provide improved tolerization to escalation of a dose of the pharmaceutical exenatide composition during the administration period.

In some embodiments, the present invention is directed to methods of effecting weight loss and/or treating excess weight or obesity in a subject undergoing diabetes treatment by administering a therapeutically effective amount of an exenatide from an implanted osmotic delivery device over an administration period. In this embodiment, weight loss and/or treating excess weight or obesity is achieved within about six weeks after initial implantation of the osmotic delivery device and up to at least 39 weeks after initial implantation.

In some embodiments, the present invention is directed to methods of abating nausea in a subject undergoing diabetes treatment, e.g., a subject having a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5% or greater than 10%, by administering a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutical exenatide composition from an implanted osmotic delivery device over an administration period, wherein nausea abates in the patient within at least about 7 days of implantation of the osmotic delivery device and the abatement remains throughout the administration period. Abating nausea will increase the likelihood that a subject will continue (e.g., not withdraw from) a treatment comprising the implanted osmotic delivery device.

In some embodiments, the present invention is directed to methods for lowering plasma glucose levels (e.g., fasting plasma glucose levels; FPG) in a subject undergoing diabetes treatment, e.g., a subject having a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5% or greater than 10%, by administering a therapeutically effective amount of an exenatide from an implanted osmotic delivery device over an administration period.

In some embodiments, the present invention is directed to methods of reducing incidence and severity of side effects from a type 2 diabetes treatment in a subject undergoing diabetes treatment, e.g., a subject having a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5% or greater than 10%, by administering a therapeutically effective amount of an exenatide from an implanted osmotic delivery device over an administration period. Reducing incidence and severity of side effects increases the likelihood that a subject will continue (e.g., not withdraw from) a treatment comprising the implanted osmotic delivery device.

In some embodiments, the present invention is directed to methods of improving a Quality of Life (QOL) assessment/score in a subject undergoing diabetes treatment, e.g., a subject having a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5% or greater than 10%, by administering a therapeutically effective amount of an exenatide from an implanted osmotic delivery device over an administration period. Improving the QOL assessment/score will increase the likelihood that a subject will continue (e.g., not withdraw from) a treatment comprising the implanted osmotic delivery device.

In some embodiments, the present invention is directed to methods of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels in a subject undergoing diabetes treatment, e.g., a subject having a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5% or greater than 10%, by administering a therapeutically effective amount of an exenatide from an implanted osmotic delivery device over an administration period

In some embodiments, the present invention is directed to methods of reducing systolic blood pressure in a subject undergoing diabetes treatment, e.g., a subject having a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5% or greater than 10% and undergoing diabetes treatment, by administering a therapeutically effective amount of an exenatide from an implanted osmotic delivery device over an administration period.

In some embodiments, the present invention is directed to methods of achieving rapid onset and consistent long-term plasma levels of an exenatide in a subject undergoing diabetes treatment, e.g., a subject having a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5% or greater than 10% and undergoing diabetes treatment, by administering a therapeutically effective amount of an exenatide from an implanted osmotic delivery device over an administration period.

Definitions

It is to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a solvent” includes a combination of two or more such solvents, reference to “a peptide” includes one or more peptides or mixtures of peptides, reference to “a drug” includes one or more drugs, reference to “an osmotic delivery device” includes one or more osmotic delivery devices, and the like. Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “or” is understood to be inclusive and covers both “or” and “and.”

Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “about” is understood as within a range of normal tolerance in the art, for example, within 2 standard deviations of the mean. About can be understood as within 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.05%, or 0.01% of the stated value. Unless otherwise clear from the context, all numerical values provided herein are modified by the term “about.”

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. Although other methods and materials similar, or equivalent, to those described herein can be used in the practice of the present invention, the preferred materials and methods are described herein.

In describing and claiming the present invention, the following terminology will be used in accordance with the definitions set out below.

The terms “drug,” “therapeutic agent,” and “beneficial agent” are used interchangeably to refer to any therapeutically active substance that is delivered to a subject to produce a desired beneficial effect. In one embodiment of the present invention, the drug is a polypeptide. Exemplary polypeptides include the insulinotrophic peptides described herein, e.g., the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, exenatide peptides, exenatide peptide analogs, exenatide peptide derivatives), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), GLP-1 peptides, GLP-1 peptide analogs, and GLP-1 peptide derivatives. The polypeptide may be an antibody or an antibody fragment. Examples of antibody fragments include Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)₂, and Fv fragments; diabodies; linear antibodies (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,870; Zapata et al., Protein Eng. 8(10): 1057-1062 (1995)); single-chain antibody molecules; and multispecific antibodies formed from antibody fragments. In another embodiment of the present invention, the drug is a small molecule, for example, hormones such as androgens or estrogens. Examples of suitable drugs include, but are not limited to, the herein-described insulinotrophic peptides, Gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), Glucagon, Glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2), Oxyntomodulin, PYY (also known as peptide YY, peptide tyrosine tyrosine), PYY(3-36), amylin, an amylin analogue (e.g., pramlintide), a ghrelin antagonist, a G protein coupled receptor 119 (GRP 119) agonist, and leptin. The devices and methods of the present invention are well suited for the delivery of proteins, small molecules and combinations thereof.

Two or more (e.g., two, three, four, or more) “drugs,” “therapeutic agents,” or “beneficial agents” can be included in a particle formulation, in a suspension formulation, and/or in a single osmotic delivery device; thus, an osmotic delivery device may provide substantial steady-state delivery of the two or more “drugs,” “therapeutic agents,” or “beneficial agents.” One of the two or more “therapeutic agents” may be an insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide). Examples of such particle formulations, in a suspension formulations, and osmotic delivery devices are described, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,140 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2015-0111818, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The two or more “therapeutic agents” may be two or more different insulinotrophic polypeptides.

The terms “peptide,” “polypeptide,” and “protein” are used interchangeably herein and typically refer to a molecule comprising a chain of two or more amino acids (e.g., most typically L-amino acids, but also including, e.g., D-amino acids, modified amino acids, amino acid analogs, and amino acid mimetic). Peptides may be naturally occurring, synthetically produced, or recombinantly expressed. Peptides may also comprise additional groups modifying the amino acid chain, for example, functional groups added via post-translational modification. Examples of post-translation modifications include, but are not limited to, acetylation, alkylation (including, methylation), biotinylation, glutamylation, glycylation, glycosylation, isoprenylation, lipoylation, phosphopantetheinylation, phosphorylation, selenation, and C-terminal amidation. The term peptide also includes peptides comprising modifications of the amino terminus and/or the carboxy terminus. Modifications of the terminal amino group include, but are not limited to, des-amino, N-lower alkyl, N-di-lower alkyl, and N-acyl modifications. Modifications of the terminal carboxy group include, but are not limited to, amide, lower alkyl amide, dialkyl amide, and lower alkyl ester modifications (e.g., wherein lower alkyl is C₁-C₄ alkyl). The term peptide also includes modifications, such as but not limited to those described above, of amino acids falling between the amino and carboxy termini. In one embodiment, a peptide may be modified by addition of a small-molecule drug.

The terminal amino acid at one end of the peptide chain typically has a free amino group (i.e., the amino terminus). The terminal amino acid at the other end of the chain typically has a free carboxyl group (i.e., the carboxy terminus). Typically, the amino acids making up a peptide are numbered in order, starting at the peptide's amino terminus and increasing in the direction of its carboxy terminus.

The phrase “amino acid residue” as used herein refers to an amino acid that is incorporated into a peptide by an amide bond or an amide bond mimetic.

GLP-1 is produced by the L-cell located mainly in the ileum and colon, and to a lesser extent by L-cells in the duodenum and jejunum. GLP-1 is a regulatory peptide of a G-coupled protein receptor on β cell and via adenyl cyclase activity and production of cAMP stimulates the insulin response to the nutrients that are absorbed from the gut (Baggio 2007, Hoist 2008). The effects of GLP-1R agonism are multiple. GLP-1 maintains glucose homeostasis by enhancing endogenous glucose dependent insulin secretion, rendering the β cells glucose competent and sensitive to GLP-1, suppressing glucagon release, restoring first and second phase insulin secretion, slowing gastric emptying, decreasing food intake, and increasing satiety (Hoist 2008, Kjems 2003, Hoist 2013, Seufret 2014). The risk of hypoglycemia is minimal given the mode of action of GLP-1. GLP-1 is an exemplary incretin; the incretins are a group of metabolic hormones that stimulate a decrease in blood glucose levels.

The term “insulinotrophic” as used herein typically refers to the ability of a compound, e.g., a peptide, to stimulate or affect the production and/or activity of insulin (e.g., an insulinotrophic hormone). Such compounds typically stimulate the secretion or biosynthesis of insulin in a subject. Thus, an “insulinotrophic peptide” is an amino acid-containing molecule capable of stimulating secretion or biosynthesis of insulin.

The term “insulinotrophic peptide” as used herein includes, but is not limited to, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), as well as derivatives and analogues thereof, and exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO; 1, as well as derivatives and analogues thereof.

The phrase “incretin mimetics” as used herein includes, but is not limited to GLP-1 peptide, peptide derivatives of GLP-1, and peptide analogs of GLP-1; and the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, exenatide peptide, peptide derivatives of exenatide, and peptide analogs of exenatide). Examples of preferred incretin mimetics include the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of exendin-4 (the naturally-occurring form of exenatide, and has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1), exenatide-LAR, lixisenatide, GLP-1 (7-36), liraglutide, dulaglutide, albiglutide, and taspoglutide. Incretin mimetics are also known in the literature as “insulinotrophic peptides.” Incretin mimetics which target the GLP-1 receptor are also known in the literature as“GLP-1 receptor agonists.”

The term “an exenatide” as used herein includes, but is not limited to the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, native exendin-4, exenatide peptides, exenatide peptide analogs, and exenatide peptide derivatives.

The term “vehicle” as used herein refers to a medium used to carry a compound, e.g., a drug or a particle containing a drug. Vehicles of the present invention typically comprise components such as polymers and solvents. The suspension vehicles of the present invention typically comprise solvents and polymers that are used to prepare suspension formulations further comprising drug particle formulations.

The phrase “phase separation” as used herein refers to the formation of multiple phases (e.g., liquid and gel phases) in the suspension vehicle, such as when the suspension vehicle contacts the aqueous environment. In some embodiments of the present invention, the suspension vehicle is formulated to exhibit phase separation upon contact with an aqueous environment having less than approximately 10% water.

The phrase “single-phase” as used herein refers to a solid, semisolid, or liquid homogeneous system that is physically and chemically uniform throughout.

The term “dispersed” as used herein refers to dissolving, dispersing, suspending, or otherwise distributing a compound, for example, a drug particle formulation, in a suspension vehicle.

The phrase “chemically stable” as used herein refers to formation in a formulation of an acceptable percentage of degradation products produced over a defined period of time by chemical pathways, such as deamidation (usually by hydrolysis), aggregation, or oxidation.

The phrase “physically stable” as used herein refers to formation in a formulation of an acceptable percentage of aggregates (e.g., dimers and other higher molecular weight products). Further, a physically stable formulation does not change its physical state as, for example, from liquid to solid or from amorphous to crystal form.

The term “viscosity” as used herein typically refers to a value determined from the ratio of shear stress to shear rate (see, e.g., Considine, D. M. & Considine, G. D., Encyclopedia of Chemistry, 4th Edition, Van Nostrand, Reinhold, N.Y., 1984) essentially as follows:

F/A=μ*V/L  (Equation 1)

-   -   where F/A=shear stress (force per unit area),     -   μ=a proportionality constant (viscosity), and     -   V/L=the velocity per layer thickness (shear rate).

From this relationship, the ratio of shear stress to shear rate defines viscosity. Measurements of shear stress and shear rate are typically determined using parallel plate rheometry performed under selected conditions (for example, a temperature of about 37° C.). Other methods for the determination of viscosity include measurement of a kinematic viscosity using viscometers, for example, a Cannon-Fenske viscometer, an Ubbelohde viscometer for the Cannon-Fenske opaque solution, or an Ostwald viscometer. Generally, suspension vehicles of the present invention have a viscosity sufficient to prevent a particle formulation suspended therein from settling during storage and use in a method of delivery, for example, in an implantable, drug delivery device.

The term “non-aqueous” as used herein refers to an overall moisture content, for example, of a suspension formulation, typically of less than or equal to about 10 wt %, preferably less than or equal to about 7 wt %, more preferably less than or equal to about 5 wt %, and more preferably less than about 4 wt %. Also, a particle formulation of the present invention comprises less than about 10 wt %, e.g., preferably less than about 5 wt % residual moisture.

The term “subject” as used herein refers to any member of the subphylum Chordata, including, without limitation, humans and other primates, including non-human primates such as rhesus macaques and other monkey species and chimpanzees and other ape species; farm animals such as cattle, sheep, pigs, goats and horses; domestic mammals such as dogs and cats; laboratory animals including rodents such as mice, rats and guinea pigs; birds, including domestic, wild and game birds such as chickens, turkeys and other gallinaceous birds, ducks, geese, and the like. The term does not denote a particular age or gender. Thus, both adult and newborn individuals are intended to be covered. Preferably the subject is a human.

The term “osmotic delivery device” as used herein typically refers to a device used for delivery of a drug (e.g., an insulinotrophic peptide) to a subject, wherein the device comprises, for example, a reservoir (made, e.g., from a titanium alloy) having a lumen that contains a suspension formulation comprising a drug (e.g., an insulinotrophic peptide) and an osmotic agent formulation. A piston assembly positioned in the lumen isolates the suspension formulation from the osmotic agent formulation. A semi-permeable membrane is positioned at a first distal end of the reservoir adjacent the osmotic agent formulation and a diffusion moderator (which defines a delivery orifice through which the suspension formulation exits the device) is positioned at a second distal end of the reservoir adjacent the suspension formulation. Typically, the osmotic delivery device is implanted within the subject, for example, subdermally or subcutaneously (e.g., in the inside, outside, or back of the upper arm and in the abdominal area). An exemplary osmotic delivery device is the DUROS® delivery device. Examples of terms synonymous to “osmotic delivery device” include but are not limited to “osmotic drug delivery device,” “osmotic drug delivery system,” “osmotic device,” “osmotic delivery device,” “osmotic delivery system,” “osmotic pump,” “implantable drug delivery device,” “drug delivery system,” “drug delivery device,” “implantable osmotic pump,” “implantable drug delivery system,” and “implantable delivery system.” Other terms for “osmotic delivery device” are known in the art. The DUROS® device is an example of an osmotic delivery device. As used herein, “ITCA 650” is a DUROS® device comprising exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1.

The term “continuous delivery” as used herein typically refers to a substantially continuous release of drug from an osmotic delivery device and into tissues near the implantation site, e.g., subdermal and subcutaneous tissues. For example, the DUROS® delivery device releases drug essentially at a predetermined rate based on the principle of osmosis. Extracellular fluid enters the DUROS® device through the semi-permeable membrane directly into the osmotic engine that expands to drive the piston at a slow and consistent rate of travel. Movement of the piston forces the drug formulation to be released through the orifice of the diffusion moderator. Thus release of the drug from the osmotic delivery device is at a slow, controlled, consistent rate.

The term “substantial steady-state delivery” as used herein typically refers to delivery of a drug at or near a target concentration over a defined period of time, wherein the amount of the drug being delivered from an osmotic delivery device is substantially zero-order delivery. Substantial zero-order delivery of a therapeutic agent (e.g., an insulinotrophic peptide, preferably, an exenatide) means that the rate of drug delivered is constant and is independent of the drug available in the delivery system; for example, for zero-order delivery, if the rate of drug delivered is graphed against time and a line is fitted to the data the line has a slope of approximately zero, as determined by standard methods (e.g., linear regression).

The phrase “drug half-life” as used herein refers to how long it takes a drug to be eliminated from blood plasma by one half of its concentration. A drug's half-life is usually measured by monitoring how a drug degrades when it is administered via injection or intravenously. A drug is usually detected using, as examples, a radioimmunoassay (RIA), a chromatographic method, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or an immunoenzymatic sandwich assay (IEMA).

The terms “μg” and “mcg” are understood to mean “micrograms.” Similarly, the terms “μl” is understood to mean “microliter.”

The term “serum” is meant to mean any blood product from which a substance can be detected. Thus, “serum” includes at least whole blood, serum, and plasma. For example, “an amount of [a substance] in a subject's serum” would cover “an amount of [the substance] in a subject's plasma.”

The term “LOCF” means “Last Observation Carried Forward.” LOCF is an imputation method that can be used to analyze clinical trial data, when such data are longitudinal, to address dropouts. In the LOCF method, the last observed non-missing value is used to fill in missing values at later points. As used herein, LOCF includes the last post-randomization data obtained from a subject with at least one post-randomization HbA1c value when the subject stopped participating in the study.

The term “mITT” stands for “Modified Intention-to-Treat Population.” Here, primary efficacy analyses and safety analyses will be performed on an mITT population that includes all subjects who were randomized and received at least one treatment with ITCA 650 or ITCA placebo, who had a valid baseline, and who had at least one post-baseline HbA_(1c) value.

Baseline is defined as the last assessment on or before the day of the initial placement of an ITCA 650 osmotic delivery device (containing drug or placebo).

2.0.0 General Overview of the Invention

Before describing the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particular types of drug delivery devices, particular sources of drugs, particular solvents, particular polymers, and the like, as use of such particulars may be selected in view of the teachings of the present specification. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments of the invention only, and is not intended to be limiting.

In some aspects, the present invention relates to a method of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. The subject is in need of treatment for type 2 diabetes. In some embodiments, the subject in need thereof has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5%. In other embodiments, the subject in need thereof has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10.0%, i.e., a high baseline (HBL) subject. In some embodiments, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10% and less than or equal to 12.0%. The method comprises providing continuous delivery of an insulinotrophic peptide from an osmotic delivery device, wherein substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide at a therapeutic concentration is achieved within a time period of with the first day of implantation up to about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, e.g., subcutaneously and/or subdermally. Thus, steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide occurs at any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation; non-limiting examples include 2 hours after implantation, 36 hours after implantation, 3 and a half days after implantation, and six days after implantation. The substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period. Humans are preferred subjects for the practice of the present invention. The present invention includes particles comprising an insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide), formulations comprising the insulinotrophic peptide, and formulations comprising particles comprising the insulinotrophic peptide, as well as an osmotic delivery device comprising the insulinotrophic peptide for use in the present methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus in a subject in need of treatment. The subject may not have previously received a drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. In some embodiments, the subject is further provided one or more other drugs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, e.g., insulin and/or oral anti-diabetic drugs including, without limitation, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs).

In some embodiments of the present invention, the administration period is, for example, at least about 1 month, at least about 1 month to about two years, at least about 2 months to about two years, at least about 3 months to about two years, at least about 3 months to about two years, at least about 4 months to about two years, at least about 5 months to about two years, at least about 6 months to about two years, at least about 8 months to about two years, or at least about 9 months to about two years, about 1 year, at least one year to about two years, at least about 14 months to about two years, at least about 16 months to about two years, at least 18 months to about two years, at least about 20 months to about two years, at least about 22 months to about two years, and about two years.

In some embodiments, the administration period is, for example, at least about 12 months to about 18 months, at least about 13 months to about 18 months, at least about 14 months to about 18 months, at least about 15 months to about 18 months, at least about 16 months to about 18 months, at least about 17 months to about 18 months, and about 18 months.

In some embodiments, the administration period is, for example, at least about 1 month to about a year, at least about 2 months to about a year, about 3 months, at least about 3 months to about a year, at least about 4 months to about a year, at least about 5 months to about a year, about 6 months, at least about 6 months to about a year, at least about 8 months to about a year, about 9 months, at least about 9 months to about a year, at least about 10 months to about a year, at least about 11 month to about a year, and about a year.

In some embodiments of the present invention, the substantial steady-state delivery of an insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) at therapeutic concentrations is achieved within about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 6 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 5 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 4 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 3 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 2 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, or within about 1 day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject. Steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide occurs at any time point after implantation and up to within about 7 days after implantation. In preferred embodiments of the present invention, the substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide at therapeutic concentrations is achieved within about 2 days and more preferably within about 1 day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject.

Continuous delivery can, for example, be zero-order, controlled continuous delivery.

In further embodiments, the treatment methods of the present invention provide a significant decrease in the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject (relative to the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration before implantation of the osmotic delivery device) that is achieved within about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 6 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 5 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 4 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 3 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 2 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, or within about 1 day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject. Thus, a subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration will initially decrease within any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation. In preferred embodiments, the significant decrease in the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, relative to the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration before implantation, is achieved within about 2 days or preferably within about 1 day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject. The significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose is typically statistically significant as demonstrated by application of an appropriate statistical test or is considered significant for the subject by a medical practitioner. A significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose relative to the baseline before implantation is typically maintained over the administration period.

The treatment methods can further comprise providing a significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, relative to the subject's HbA1c % before implantation of the osmotic delivery device. The decrease is typically achieved within about six weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device (e.g., within about five weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about four weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about three weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about two weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, or within about one week after implantation of the osmotic delivery device). The significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % is maintained over the administration period.

The treatment methods can further provide a decrease in a subject's HbA1c % over the administration period of at least about 0.5%, at least about 1.0%, at least about 1.5%, at least about 2.0%, at least about 2.5%, at least about 3.0%, at least about 3.5%, at least about 4.0%, at least about 4.5%, at least about 5.0%, at least about 5.5%, or at least about 6.0% from baseline over the administration period or a reduction in the amount of HbA1c in the subject's serum of at least about 35 percent, at least about 40 percent, at least about 45 percent, at least about 50 percent, or at least about 55 percent at the end of an administration period relative to the beginning of the administration period.

In yet further embodiments of the present invention, the treatment methods further comprise the capability to terminate the continuous delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) such that the concentration of the insulinotrophic peptide is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject within about 6 half-lives of the insulinotrophic peptide after termination of continuous delivery, within about 5 half-lives of the insulinotrophic peptide after termination of continuous delivery, within about 4 half-lives of the insulinotrophic peptide after termination of continuous delivery, or within about 3 half-lives of the insulinotrophic peptide after termination of continuous delivery. Thus, the insulinotrophic peptide will be substantially undetectable in a subject's blood sample within any time point after termination of continuous delivery and up to about 6 half-lives after termination of continuous delivery. Examples of insulinotrophic peptide half-lives are the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, approximately 2.5 hours, and GLP-1, approximately 2 minutes. The serum concentration of the insulinotrophic peptide is, for example, detected by a radioimmunoassay (RIA), a chromatographic method, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or an immunoenzymatic sandwich assay (IEMA). Termination of the continuous delivery can be accomplished, for example, by removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention, the method of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus further comprises terminating the continuous delivery such that the concentration of the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject after termination of continuous delivery, for example, within about 72 hours, about 48 hours, about 24, about 14 hours, about 12 hours, about 10 hours, about 8 hours, about 6 hours, or about 4 hours. Thus, the insulinotrophic peptide will be substantially undetectable in a subject's blood sample within any time point after termination of continuous delivery and up to about 72 hours after termination of continuous delivery. In some embodiments, continuous delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide is terminated by removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject. The insulinotrophic peptide may be detected in a serum sample from the subject, for example, by an RIA, a chromatographic method, an ECL assay, an ELISA, or an IEMA.

Osmotic delivery devices for use in the methods of the present invention can comprise the components described herein including, but not limited to, a reservoir, a semi-permeable membrane, an osmotic engine, a piston, a suspension formulation, and a diffusion moderator. In some embodiments, the osmotic delivery device comprises: an impermeable reservoir comprising interior and exterior surfaces and first and second open ends; a semi-permeable membrane in sealing relationship with the first open end of the reservoir; an osmotic engine within the reservoir and adjacent the semi-permeable membrane; a piston adjacent the osmotic engine, wherein the piston forms a movable seal with the interior surface of the reservoir, the piston divides the reservoir into a first chamber and a second chamber, the first chamber comprising the osmotic engine; a suspension formulation, wherein the second chamber comprises the suspension formulation and the suspension formulation is flowable. The osmotic delivery device comprises a diffusion moderator inserted in the second open end of the reservoir, the diffusion moderator adjacent the suspension formulation. In some embodiments, the reservoir comprises titanium or a titanium alloy.

Suspension formulations used in the methods of the present invention typically comprise a particle formulation comprising a therapeutic agent (e.g., an insulinotrophic peptide, preferably, an exenatide) and a vehicle formulation.

A vehicle formulation comprises a solvent (e.g., benzyl benzoate, lauryl lactate, and lauryl alcohol) and a polymer (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone: also herein referred to as PVP, polyvidone, and povidone). Preferably, the polymer is polyvinylpyrrolidone. The vehicle formulation may have a viscosity of between about 10,000 poise and about 20,000 poise at 37° C.

In preferred embodiments, the insulinotrophic peptide is GLP-1 or an incretin mimetic, e.g., an exenatide peptide, a peptide analog of exenatide, or a peptide derivative of exenatide; and a GLP-1 peptide (e.g., GLP-1(7-36) amide peptide), a peptide analog of GLP-1, or a peptide derivative of GLP-1. Specific examples of preferred insulinotrophic peptides useful in the practice of the present invention include the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 (e.g., native exendin-4), exenatide-LAR, lixisenatide, GLP-1(7-36), liraglutide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, and taspoglutide. The sequence of exendin-4 is H-His-Gly-Glu-Gly-Thr-Phe-Thr-Ser-Asp-Leu-Ser-Lys-Gln-Met-Glu-Glu-Glu-Ala-Val-Arg-Leu-Phe-Ile-Glu-Trp-Leu-Lys-Asn-Gly-Gly-Pro-Ser-Ser-Gly-Ala-Pro-Pro-Pro-Ser-NH₂ (SEQ ID NO: 1).

Particles of a particle formulation comprising an insulinotrophic peptide have diameters of between about 2 microns to about 150 micron, e.g., less than 150 microns in diameter, less than 100 microns in diameter, less than 50 microns in diameter, less than 30 microns in diameter, less than 10 microns in diameter, less than 5 microns in diameter, and about 2 microns in diameter. When the insulinotrophic peptide is an exenatide, particles have diameters of between about 2 microns and about 50 microns.

An insulinotrophic peptide can be included in a particle formulation, in a suspension formulation, and/or in a single osmotic delivery device along with one or more (e.g., one, two, three, four, or more) other therapeutic agents; thus, an osmotic delivery device may provide substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide and one or more other therapeutic agents. Non-limiting examples of the one or more other therapeutic agents include amylin, an amylin analogue (e.g., pramlintide), a ghrelin antagonist, a G protein coupled receptor 119 (GRP 119) agonist, and leptin. An osmotic delivery device may provide substantial steady-state delivery of two or more different insulinotrophic peptides.

In some embodiments, the subject is further provided one or more other drugs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, e.g., insulin and/or oral anti-diabetic drugs including, without limitation, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs).

In some embodiments of the present invention, continuous delivery can provide to the subject am/day dose of an insulinotrophic peptide, for example, a dose of about 10 μg/day, about 15 μg/day, about 20 μg/day, about 30 μg/day, about 40 μg/day, about 50 μg/day, about 60 μg/day, about 70 μg/day, and about 80 μg/day. The upper limit to the daily dose depends to the peptide/active agent and the total capacity of the device itself. A skilled artisan would be able to determine a suitable dose (with regards to safety and efficacy) for a specific insulinotrophic peptide. Thus, the daily dose may exceed 80 μg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the insulinotrophic peptide is about 20 mcg/day. More preferably, the insulinotrophic peptide is an exenatide and the mcg/day dose is about 20 mcg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the insulinotrophic peptide is about 40 mcg/day. More preferably, the insulinotrophic peptide is an exenatide and the mcg/day dose is about 40 mcg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the insulinotrophic peptide is about 60 mcg/day. More preferably, the insulinotrophic peptide is an exenatide and the mcg/day dose is about 60 mcg/day.

In additional embodiments of the present invention, the method of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus further comprises a first continuous administration period of the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) at a first μg/day dose that is followed by a second continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the insulinotrophic peptide to a second μg/day dose, wherein the second μg/day dose is greater than the first μg/day dose. In some embodiments, the first μg/day dose is delivered by a first osmotic delivery device and the second μg/day dose is delivered by an at least second osmotic delivery device, and delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from at least the first or the at least second osmotic delivery device is continuous over the administration period of at least about 1 month (e.g., at least about 1 month, at least about 2 months, and at least about 3 months). In one embodiment, the second μg/day dose is at least two times greater than the first μg/day dose. Further, the method can comprise at least one more continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the insulinotrophic peptide to a higher μg/day dose relative to the second μg/day dose. Dose escalation can be accomplished, for example, by removal of the first osmotic delivery device and implantation of a second osmotic delivery device, or by implantation of a second or further osmotic delivery device where the total dose delivered by the first and second osmotic delivery devices results in the desired dose escalation. Dose escalation allows a subject to receive a therapeutic benefit while being gradually exposed to the insulinotrophic peptide. This tolerizes the subject to the insulinotrophic peptide and reduces the incidence of side effects. Later, once the subject has completed an initial tolerization period with a first, low daily dose, the dose is escalated to a (higher) maintenance dose. A skilled artisan would be able to determine suitable doses (with regards to safety and efficacy) for a first dose and subsequent doses.

Exemplary dose escalations for the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) are as follows: about 10 μg/day followed by about 20 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 20 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 60 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day or about 60 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day.

Preferably, the first mcg/day dose of the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is about 20 mcg/day followed by about 40 mcg/day.

Preferably, the first mcg/day dose of the insulinotrophic peptide (e.g., an exenatide) followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is about 20 mcg/day followed by about 60 mcg/day.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises at least one more continuous administration period, subsequent to a second administration period, providing a dose at the same mcg/day dose as the second mcg/day dose.

In some embodiments, the subject has not previously received a drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.

In any of the above-described embodiments, the insulinotrophic peptide may comprise GLP-1 or an incretin mimetic selected the group consisting of a GLP-1 peptide, a peptide analog of GLP-1, or a peptide derivative of GLP-1, an exenatide (which includes the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, native exendin-4, an exenatide peptide, a peptide analog of exenatide, and a peptide derivative of exenatide). In any of the above methods, the insulinotrophic peptide is selected from the group consisting of lixisenatide, liraglutide, albiglutide, and taspoglutide.

In any of the above-described embodiments, the subject may further be provided one or more other drugs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, e.g., insulin and/or oral anti-diabetic drugs including, without limitation, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs).

Any of the above-described embodiments further promote weight loss in a subject in need thereof. Preferably, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5%. More preferably, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10.0%. The subject may have a baseline HbA1c % of less than or equal to 12%. Significant weight loss is achieved by about six weeks (e.g., about five weeks, about four weeks, about three weeks, about two weeks, and about one week) after initial implantation of the osmotic delivery device and up to 39 weeks after initial implantation.

The present invention also relates to a method of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus comprising providing continuous delivery of an exenatide from an osmotic delivery device. The subject is in need of treatment for type 2 diabetes. In some embodiments, the subject in need thereof has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5%. In other embodiments, the subject in need thereof has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10.0%, i.e., a high baseline (HBL) subject. In some embodiments, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10% and less than or equal to 12.0%.

Substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide at a therapeutic concentration is achieved within a time period of with the first day of implantation up to about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, e.g., subcutaneously and/or subdermally. Thus, steady-state delivery of the exenatide occurs at any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation; non-limiting examples include 2 hours after implantation, 36 hours after implantation, 3 and a half days after implantation, and six days after implantation. The substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period. Humans are preferred subjects for the practice of the present invention. The present invention includes particles comprising an exenatide, formulations comprising the exenatide, and formulations comprising particles comprising the exenatide, as well as an osmotic delivery device comprising the exenatide for use in the present methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus in a subject in need of treatment. The subject may not have previously received a drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. In some embodiments, the subject is further provided one or more other drugs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, e.g., insulin and/or oral anti-diabetic drugs including, without limitation, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs).

In some embodiments of the present invention, the administration period is, for example, at least about 1 month, at least about 1 month to about two years, at least about 2 months to about two years, at least about 3 months to about two years, at least about 3 months to about two years, at least about 4 months to about two years, at least about 5 months to about two years, at least about 6 months to about two years, at least about 8 months to about two years, or at least about 9 months to about two years, about 1 year, at least one year to about two years, at least about 14 months to about two years, at least about 16 months to about two years, at least 18 months to about two years, at least about 20 months to about two years, at least about 22 months to about two years, and about two years.

In some embodiments, the administration period is, for example, at least about 12 months to about 18 months, at least about 13 months to about 18 months, at least about 14 months to about 18 months, at least about 15 months to about 18 months, at least about 16 months to about 18 months, at least about 17 months to about 18 months, and about 18 months.

In some embodiments, the administration period is, for example, at least about 1 month to about a year, at least about 2 months to about a year, about 3 months, at least about 3 months to about a year, at least about 4 months to about a year, at least about 5 months to about a year, about 6 months, at least about 6 months to about a year, at least about 8 months to about a year, about 9 months, at least about 9 months to about a year, at least about 10 months to about a year, at least about 11 month to about a year, and about a year.

In some embodiments of the present invention, the substantial steady-state delivery of an exenatide at therapeutic concentrations is achieved within about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 6 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 5 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 4 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 3 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 2 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, or within about 1 day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject. Steady-state delivery of the exenatide occurs at any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation. In preferred embodiments of the present invention, the substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide at therapeutic concentrations is achieved within about 2 days and more preferably within about 1 day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject.

Continuous delivery can, for example, be zero-order, controlled continuous delivery.

In further embodiments, the treatment methods of the present invention provide a significant decrease in the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject (relative to the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration before implantation of the osmotic delivery device) that is achieved within about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 6 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 5 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 4 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 3 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 2 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, or within about 1 day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject. Thus, a subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration will initially decrease within any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation. In preferred embodiments, the significant decrease in the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, relative to the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration before implantation, is achieved within about 2 days or preferably within about 1 day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject. The significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose is typically statistically significant as demonstrated by application of an appropriate statistical test or is considered significant for the subject by a medical practitioner. A significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose relative to the baseline before implantation is typically maintained over the administration period.

The treatment methods can further comprise providing a significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, relative to the subject's HbA1c % before implantation of the osmotic delivery device. The decrease is typically achieved within about six weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device (e.g., within about five weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about four weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about three weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about two weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, or within about one week after implantation of the osmotic delivery device). The significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % is maintained over the administration period.

The treatment methods can further provide a decrease in a subject's HbA1c % over the administration period of at least about 0.5%, at least about 1.0%, at least about 1.5%, at least about 2.0%, at least about 2.5%, at least about 3.0%, at least about 3.5%, at least about 4.0%, at least about 4.5%, at least about 5.0%, at least about 5.5%, or at least about 6.0% from baseline over the administration period or a reduction in the amount of HbA1c in the subject's serum of at least about 35 percent, at least about 40 percent, at least about 45 percent, at least about 50 percent, or at least about 55 percent at the end of an administration period relative to the beginning of the administration period.

In yet further embodiments of the present invention, the treatment methods further comprise the capability to terminate the continuous delivery of the exenatide such that the concentration of the exenatide is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject within about 6 half-lives of the exenatide after termination of continuous delivery, within about 5 half-lives of the exenatide after termination of continuous delivery, within about 4 half-lives of the exenatide after termination of continuous delivery, or within about 3 half-lives of the exenatide after termination of continuous delivery. Thus, the exenatide will be substantially undetectable in a subject's blood sample within any time point after termination of continuous delivery and up to about 6 half-lives after termination of continuous delivery. Examples of exenatide half-lives are the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, approximately 2.5 hours, and GLP-1, approximately 2 minutes. Termination of the continuous delivery can be accomplished, for example, by removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject. The serum concentration of the exenatide is, for example, detected by a radioimmunoassay (RIA), a chromatographic method, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or an immunoenzymatic sandwich assay (IEMA).

In some embodiments of the present invention, the method of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus further comprises terminating the continuous delivery such that the concentration of the exenatide is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject after termination of continuous delivery, for example, within about 72 hours, about 48 hours, about 24, about 14 hours, about 12 hours, about 10 hours, about 8 hours, about 6 hours, or about 4 hours. Thus, the exenatide will be substantially undetectable in a subject's blood sample within any time point after termination of continuous delivery and up to about 72 hours after termination of continuous delivery. In some embodiments, continuous delivery of the exenatide is terminated by removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject. The exenatide may be detected in a serum sample from the subject, for example, by an RIA, a chromatographic method, an ECL assay, an ELISA, or an IEMA.

Osmotic delivery devices for use in the methods of the present invention can comprise the components described herein including, but not limited to, a reservoir, a semi-permeable membrane, an osmotic engine, a piston, a suspension formulation, and a diffusion moderator. In some embodiments, the osmotic delivery device comprises: an impermeable reservoir comprising interior and exterior surfaces and first and second open ends; a semi-permeable membrane in sealing relationship with the first open end of the reservoir; an osmotic engine within the reservoir and adjacent the semi-permeable membrane; a piston adjacent the osmotic engine, wherein the piston forms a movable seal with the interior surface of the reservoir, the piston divides the reservoir into a first chamber and a second chamber, the first chamber comprising the osmotic engine; a suspension formulation, wherein the second chamber comprises the suspension formulation and the suspension formulation is flowable. The osmotic delivery device comprises a diffusion moderator inserted in the second open end of the reservoir, the diffusion moderator adjacent the suspension formulation. In some embodiments, the reservoir comprises titanium or a titanium alloy.

Suspension formulations used in the methods of the present invention typically comprise a particle formulation comprising an exenatide and a vehicle formulation.

A vehicle formulation comprises a solvent (e.g., benzyl benzoate, lauryl lactate, and lauryl alcohol) and a polymer (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone: also herein referred to as PVP, polyvidone, and povidone). Preferably, the polymer is polyvinylpyrrolidone. The vehicle formulation may have a viscosity of between about 10,000 poise and about 20,000 poise at 37° C.

Specific examples of preferred exenatides useful in the practice of the present invention include the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, native exendin-4, an exenatide peptide, a peptide analog of exenatide, a peptide derivative of exenatide, lixisenatide, or exenatide-LAR.

Particles of a particle formulation comprising an exenatide have diameters of between about 2 microns to about 150 micron, e.g., less than 150 microns in diameter, less than 100 microns in diameter, less than 50 microns in diameter, less than 30 microns in diameter, less than 10 microns in diameter, less than 5 microns in diameter, and about 2 microns in diameter. Preferably, the particles have diameters of between about 2 microns and about 50 microns.

An exenatide can be included in a particle formulation, in a suspension formulation, and/or in a single osmotic delivery device along with one or more (e.g., one, two, three, four, or more) other therapeutic agents; thus, an osmotic delivery device may provide substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide and one or more other therapeutic agents. Non-limiting examples of the one or more other therapeutic agents include amylin, an amylin analogue (e.g., pramlintide), a ghrelin antagonist, a G protein coupled receptor 119 (GRP 119) agonist, and leptin. An osmotic delivery device may provide substantial steady-state delivery of two or more different exenatides.

In some embodiments, the subject is further provided one or more other drugs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, e.g., insulin and/or oral anti-diabetic drugs including, without limitation, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs).

In some embodiments of the present invention, continuous delivery can provide to the subject a μg/day dose of an exenatide, for example, a dose of about 10 μg/day, about 15 μg/day, about 20 μg/day, about 30 μg/day, about 40 μg/day, about 50 μg/day, about 60 μg/day, about 70 μg/day, and about 80 μg/day. The upper limit to the daily dose depends to the peptide/active agent and the total capacity of the device itself. Thus, the daily dose may exceed 80 μg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the exenatide is about 20 mcg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the exenatide is about 40 mcg/day.

Preferably, the mcg/day dose of the exenatide is about 60 mcg/day.

In additional embodiments of the present invention, the method of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus further comprises a first continuous administration period of the exenatide at a first μg/day dose that is followed by a second continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the exenatide to a second μg/day dose, wherein the second μg/day dose is greater than the first μg/day dose. In some embodiments, the first μg/day dose is delivered by a first osmotic delivery device and the second μg/day dose is delivered by an at least second osmotic delivery device, and delivery of the exenatide from at least the first or the at least second osmotic delivery device is continuous over the administration period of at least about 1 month (e.g., at least about 1 month, at least about 2 months, and at least about 3 months). In one embodiment, the second μg/day dose is at least two times greater than the first μg/day dose. Further, the method can comprise at least one more continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the exenatide to a higher μg/day dose relative to the second μg/day dose. Dose escalation can be accomplished, for example, by removal of the first osmotic delivery device and implantation of a second osmotic delivery device, or by implantation of a second or further osmotic delivery device where the total dose delivered by the first and second osmotic delivery devices results in the desired dose escalation. Dose escalation allows a subject to receive a therapeutic benefit while being gradually exposed to the exenatide. This tolerizes the subject to the exenatide and reduces the incidence of side effects. Later, once the subject has completed an initial tolerization period with a first, low daily dose, the dose is escalated to a (higher) maintenance dose.

Exemplary dose escalations for the exenatide are as follows: about 10 μg/day followed by about 20 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 20 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 60 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day or about 60 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day.

Preferably, the first mcg/day dose of the exenatide followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is about 20 mcg/day followed by about 40 mcg/day.

Preferably, the first mcg/day dose of the exenatide followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is about 20 mcg/day followed by about 60 mcg/day.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises at least one more continuous administration period, subsequent to a second administration period, providing a dose at the same mcg/day dose as the second mcg/day dose.

In some embodiments, the subject has not previously received a drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.

In any of the above-described embodiments, the exenatide may comprise the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, native exendin-4, an exenatide peptide, a peptide analog of exenatide, and a peptide derivative of exenatide. In any of the above methods, the exenatide is selected from the group consisting of lixisenatide, liraglutide, albiglutide, and taspoglutide.

In any of the above-described embodiments, the subject may further be provided one or more other drugs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, e.g., insulin and/or oral anti-diabetic drugs including, without limitation, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs).

Any of the above-described embodiments further promote weight loss in a subject in need thereof. Preferably, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 6.5%. More preferably, the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10.0%. The subject may have a baseline HbA1c % of less than or equal to 12%. Significant weight loss is achieved by about six weeks (e.g., about five weeks, about four weeks, about three weeks, about two weeks, and about one week) after initial implantation of the osmotic delivery device and up to 39 weeks after initial implantation.

The present invention also relates to a method of treating a disease or condition in a subject in need of treatment. The subject has a baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) % of greater than 6.5%. The subject may have a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 10.0%. The subject may have a baseline HbA1c % of less than or equal to 12%. The method comprises providing continuous delivery of a drug from an osmotic delivery device. Substantial steady-state delivery of the drug at a therapeutic concentration is achieved within a time period of with the first day of implantation up to about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject. Thus, steady-state delivery of the drug occurs at any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation; non-limiting examples include 2 hours after implantation, 36 hours after implantation, 3 and a half days after implantation, and six days after implantation. The substantial steady-state delivery of the drug from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period. Humans are preferred subjects for the practice of the present invention. The present invention includes particles comprising a drug, formulations comprising the drug, and formulations comprising particles comprising the drug, as well as an osmotic delivery device comprising the drug for use in the present methods of treating the disease or condition in a subject in need of treatment. The subject may not have previously received a drug for treating the disease or condition. In some embodiments, the subject is further provided one or more other drugs for treating the disease or condition.

In some embodiments of the present invention, the administration period is, for example, at least about 1 month, at least about 1 month to about two years, at least about 2 months to about two years, at least about 3 months to about two years, at least about 3 months to about two years, at least about 4 months to about two years, at least about 5 months to about two years, at least about 6 months to about two years, at least about 8 months to about two years, or at least about 9 months to about two years, about 1 year, at least one year to about two years, at least about 14 months to about two years, at least about 16 months to about two years, at least 18 months to about two years, at least about 20 months to about two years, at least about 22 months to about two years, and about two years.

In some embodiments, the administration period is, for example, at least about 12 months to about 18 months, at least about 13 months to about 18 months, at least about 14 months to about 18 months, at least about 15 months to about 18 months, at least about 16 months to about 18 months, at least about 17 months to about 18 months, and about 18 months.

In some embodiments, the administration period is, for example, at least about 1 month to about a year, at least about 2 months to about a year, about 3 months, at least about 3 months to about a year, at least about 4 months to about a year, at least about 5 months to about a year, about 6 months, at least about 6 months to about a year, at least about 8 months to about a year, about 9 months, at least about 9 months to about a year, at least about 10 months to about a year, at least about 11 months to about a year, and about a year.

In some embodiments of the present invention, the substantial steady-state delivery of a drug at therapeutic concentrations is achieved within about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 6 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 5 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 4 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 3 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, within about 2 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, or within about 1 day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject. Steady-state delivery of the drug occurs at any time point after implantation and up to about 7 days after implantation. In preferred embodiments of the present invention, the substantial steady-state delivery of the drug at therapeutic concentrations is achieved within about 2 days and more preferably within about 1 day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject.

In yet further embodiments of the present invention, the treatment methods further comprise the capability to terminate the continuous delivery of the drug such that the concentration of the drug is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject within about 6 half-lives of the drug after termination of continuous delivery, within about 5 half-lives of the drug after termination of continuous delivery, within about 4 half-lives of the drug after termination of continuous delivery, or within about 3 half-lives of the drug after termination of continuous delivery. Thus, the drug will be substantially undetectable in a subject's blood sample within any time point after termination of continuous delivery and up to about 6 half-lives after termination of continuous delivery. Some examples of drug half-lives are as follows: GIP, approximately 5 minutes; PYY, approximately 8 minutes; glucagon, approximately 6 minutes; oxyntomodulin, approximately 6 minutes; and GLP-2, approximately 6 minutes. The drug may be detected in a serum sample from the subject, for example, by an RIA, a chromatographic method, an ECL assay, an ELISA, or an IEMA. Termination of the continuous delivery can be accomplished, for example, by removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject.

In some embodiments of the present invention, the method of treating a disease or condition further comprises terminating the continuous delivery such that the concentration of the drug is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject after termination of continuous delivery, for example, within about 72 hours, about 48 hours, about 24, about 14 hours, about 12 hours, about 10 hours, about 8 hours, about 6 hours, or about 4 hours. Thus, the drug will be substantially undetectable in a subject's blood sample within any time point after termination of continuous delivery and up to about 72 hours after termination of continuous delivery. In some embodiments, continuous delivery of the drug is terminated by removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject. In some embodiments, continuous delivery of the drug may be terminated by removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject. The serum concentration of the drug is, for example, detected by a radioimmunoassay (RIA), a chromatographic method, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or an immunoenzymatic sandwich assay (IEMA).

Osmotic delivery devices for use in the methods of the present invention can comprise the components described herein including, but not limited to, a reservoir, a semi-permeable membrane, an osmotic engine, a piston, a suspension formulation, and a diffusion moderator. In some embodiments, the osmotic delivery device comprises: an impermeable reservoir comprising interior and exterior surfaces and first and second open ends; a semi-permeable membrane in sealing relationship with the first open end of the reservoir; an osmotic engine within the reservoir and adjacent the semi-permeable membrane; a piston adjacent the osmotic engine, wherein the piston forms a movable seal with the interior surface of the reservoir, the piston divides the reservoir into a first chamber and a second chamber, the first chamber comprising the osmotic engine; a suspension formulation, wherein the second chamber comprises the suspension formulation and the suspension formulation is flowable. The osmotic delivery device comprises a diffusion moderator inserted in the second open end of the reservoir, the diffusion moderator adjacent the suspension formulation. In some embodiments, the reservoir comprises titanium or a titanium alloy.

Suspension formulations used in the methods of the present invention typically comprise a particle formulation comprising a drug and a vehicle formulation.

Two or more (e.g., two, three, four, or more) “drugs,” “therapeutic agents,” or “beneficial agents” can be included in a particle formulation, in a suspension formulation, and/or in a single osmotic delivery device; thus, an osmotic delivery device may provide substantial steady-state delivery of the two or more “drugs,” “therapeutic agents,” or “beneficial agents.” Examples of such particle formulations, in a suspension formulations, and osmotic delivery devices are described, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,140 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2015-0111818, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

A vehicle formulation comprises a solvent (e.g., benzyl benzoate, lauryl lactate, and lauryl alcohol) and a polymer (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone: also herein referred to as PVP, polyvidone, and povidone). Preferably, the polymer is polyvinylpyrrolidone. The vehicle formulation may have a viscosity of between about 10,000 poise and about 20,000 poise at 37° C.

The terms “drug,” “therapeutic agent,” and “beneficial agent” are used interchangeably to refer to any therapeutically active substance that is delivered to a subject to produce a desired beneficial effect. In one embodiment of the present invention, the drug is a polypeptide. In some embodiments, the polypeptide is an insulinotrophic peptide described herein. In some embodiments, the polypeptide may be an antibody or an antibody fragment. Examples of antibody fragments include Fab, Fab′, F(ab)₂, and Fv fragments; diabodies; linear antibodies (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,870; Zapata et al., Protein Eng. 8(10): 1057-1062 (1995)); single-chain antibody molecules; and multispecific antibodies formed from antibody fragments. In another embodiment of the present invention, the drug is a small molecule, for example, hormones such as androgens or estrogens. Examples of preferred drugs include, but are not limited to, the herein-described insulinotrophic peptides and Gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), Glucagon, Glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2), Oxyntomodulin, PYY (also known as peptide YY, peptide tyrosine tyrosine), PYY(3-36), amylin, an amylin analogue (e.g., pramlintide), a ghrelin antagonist, a G protein coupled receptor 119 (GRP 119) agonist, and leptin. The devices and methods of the present invention are well suited for the delivery of proteins, small molecules and combinations thereof.

Particles of a particle formulation comprising a drug have diameters of between about 2 microns to about 150 micron, e.g., less than 150 microns in diameter, less than 100 microns in diameter, less than 50 microns in diameter, less than 30 microns in diameter, less than 10 microns in diameter, less than 5 microns in diameter, and about 2 microns in diameter. Preferably, the particles have diameters of between about 2 microns and about 50 microns.

In some embodiments, the subject is further provided one or more other drugs for treating a disease or condition.

In some embodiments of the present invention, continuous delivery can provide to the subject a steady μg/day dose of a drug. The upper limit to the daily dose depends to the drug and the total capacity of the device itself.

In additional embodiments of the present invention, the method of treating a disease or condition further comprises a first continuous administration period of the drug at a first μg/day dose that is followed by a second continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the drug to a second μg/day dose, wherein the second μg/day dose is greater than the first μg/day dose. In some embodiments, the first μg/day dose is delivered by a first osmotic delivery device and the second μg/day dose is delivered by an at least second osmotic delivery device, and delivery of the drug from at least the first or the at least second osmotic delivery device is continuous over the administration period of at least about 1 month (e.g., at least about 1 month, at least about 2 months, and at least about 3 months). In one embodiment, the second μg/day dose is at least two times greater than the first μg/day dose. Further, the method can comprise at least one more continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the drug to a higher μg/day dose relative to the second μg/day dose. Dose escalation can be accomplished, for example, by removal of the first osmotic delivery device and implantation of a second osmotic delivery device, or by implantation of a second or further osmotic delivery device where the total dose delivered by the first and second osmotic delivery devices results in the desired dose escalation. Dose escalation allows a subject to receive a therapeutic benefit while being gradually exposed to the drug. This tolerizes the subject to the drug and reduces the incidence of side effects. Later, once the subject has completed an initial tolerization period with a first, low daily dose, the dose is escalated to a (higher) maintenance dose.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises at least one more continuous administration period, subsequent to a second administration period, providing a dose at the same mcg/day dose as the second mcg/day dose.

In some embodiments, the subject has not previously received a drug for treating a disease or condition.

In any of the above-described embodiments, the subject may further be provided one or more other drugs for treating a disease or condition.

Any of the above aspects and embodiments can be combined with any other aspect or embodiment as disclosed herein.

3.0.0 Formulations and Compositions

Drugs for use in the practice of the present invention are typically uniformly suspended, dissolved or dispersed in a suspension vehicle to form a suspension formulation.

3.1.0 Drug Particle Formulations

In one aspect, the present invention provides drug particle formulations for pharmaceutical use. The particle formulation typically comprises a drug and includes one or more stabilizing component. Examples of stabilizing components include, but are not limited to, carbohydrates, antioxidants, amino acids, buffers, inorganic compounds, and surfactants.

3.1.1 Exemplary Drugs

The drug particle formulations comprise a drug. The drug may be any physiologically or pharmacologically active substance, particularly those known to be delivered to the body of a human or an animal.

Suitable drugs include, but are not limited to: peptides, proteins, polypeptides or synthetic analogs of these species, as well as mixtures thereof.

In one embodiment, preferred drugs include macromolecules. Such macromolecules include, but are not limited to, pharmacologically active peptides, proteins, or polypeptides. Numerous peptides, proteins, or polypeptides that are useful in the practice of the present invention are described herein.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the drug is a polypeptide. In some embodiments, the polypeptide is an insulinotrophic peptide described herein. In some embodiments, the polypeptide may be an antibody or an antibody fragment. Examples of antibody fragments include Fab, Fab′, F(ab)₂, and Fv fragments; diabodies; linear antibodies (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,870; Zapata et al., Protein Eng. 8(10): 1057-1062 (1995)); single-chain antibody molecules; and multispecific antibodies formed from antibody fragments. In addition to the peptides, proteins, or polypeptides described, modifications of these peptides, proteins, or polypeptides are also known to one of skill in the art and can be used in the practice of the present invention following the guidance presented herein. Such modifications include, but are not limited to, amino acid analogs, amino acid mimetics, analog polypeptides, or derivative polypeptides. Further, the drugs disclosed herein may be formulated or administered singly or in combination (e.g., using mixtures of drugs or multiple devices; U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009/0202608).

Some embodiments of the present invention comprise use of peptide hormones, for example, glucagon and incretin mimetics (e.g., GLP-1 peptides and exenatide peptides), as well as peptide analogs and peptide derivatives thereof; PYY (also known as peptide YY, peptide tyrosine tyrosine), as well as peptide analogs and peptide derivatives thereof, for example, PYY(3-36); oxyntomodulin, as well as peptide analogs and peptide derivatives thereof); and gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), as well as peptide analogs and peptide derivatives thereof.

Some embodiments of the present invention comprise use of amylin, an amylin analogue (e.g., pramlintide), a ghrelin antagonist, a G protein coupled receptor 119 (GRP 119) agonist, and leptin for treating type 2 diabetes and/or promoting weight loss.

GLP-1, including three forms of the peptide, GLP-1(1-37), GLP-1(7-37) and GLP-1(7-36) amide, as well as peptide analogs of GLP-1 have been shown to stimulate insulin secretion (i.e., is insulinotrophic), which induces glucose uptake by cells and results in decreases in serum glucose concentrations (see, e g., Mojsov, S., Int. J. Peptide Protein Research, 40:333-343 (1992)). The amino acid sequence of GLP-1 is EGTFTSDVSSYLEGQAAKEFIAWLVKGR (SEQ ID NO: 2).

Numerous GLP-1 peptide derivatives and peptide analogs demonstrating insulinotrophic action are known in the art (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,118,666; 5,120,712; 5,512,549; 5,545,618; 5,574,008; 5,574,008; 5,614,492; 5,958,909; 6,191,102; 6,268,343; 6,329,336; 6,451,974; 6,458,924; 6,514,500; 6,593,295; 6,703,359; 6,706,689; 6,720,407; 6,821,949; 6,849,708; 6,849,714; 6,887,470; 6,887,849; 6,903,186; 7,022,674; 7,041,646; 7,084,243; 7,101,843; 7,138,486; 7,141,547; 7,144,863; and 7,199,217), as well as in clinical trials (e.g., taspoglutide and albiglutide). One example of a GLP-1 peptide derivative useful in the practice of the present invention is VICTOZA® (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd D K) (liraglutide; U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,268,343, 6,458,924, and 7,235,627). Once-daily injectable VICTOZA® (liraglutide) is commercially available in the United States, Europe, and Japan. For ease of reference, herein, the family of GLP-1 peptides (other than GLP-1 itself), GLP-1 peptide derivatives and GLP-1 peptide analogs having insulinotrophic activity is referred to collectively as “GLP-1 receptor agonists.”

The molecule exenatide has the amino acid sequence of exendin-4 (Kolterman et al., J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88(7):3082-9 (2003)) and is produced by chemical synthesis or recombinant expression. Twice-daily injectable exenatide is commercially available in the United States and Europe, and sold under the trade name of BYETTA® (Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, Calif.). Exendin-3 and exendin-4 are known in the art and were originally isolated from Heloderma spp. (Eng, J., et al., J. Biol. Chem., 265:20259-62 (1990); Eng., J., et al., J. Biol. Chem., 267:7402-05 (1992)). Use of exendin-3 and exendin-4 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and the prevention of hyperglycemia has been proposed (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,424,286). Numerous exenatide peptide derivatives and peptide analogs (including, e.g., exendin-4 agonists) are known in the art (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,424,286; 6,268,343; 6,329,336; 6,506,724; 6,514,500; 6,528,486; 6,593,295; 6,703,359; 6,706,689; 6,767,887; 6,821,949; 6,849,714; 6,858,576; 6,872,700; 6,887,470; 6,887,849; 6,924,264; 6,956,026; 6,989,366; 7,022,674; 7,041,646; 7,115,569; 7,138,375; 7,141,547; 7,153,825; and 7,157,555). One example of an exenatide derivative useful in the practice of the present invention is lixisenatide (also known as ZP10, AVE0010) (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,528,486), which is in clinical trials. For ease of reference, herein, the family of exenatide peptides (e.g., including exendin-3, exendin-4, and exendin-4-amide), exenatide peptide derivatives, and exenatide peptide analogs is referred to collectively as “exenatides.”

Peptide YY (PYY) is a 36 amino acid residue peptide amide. PYY inhibits gut motility and blood flow (Laburthe, M., Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1(3):168-74 (1990), mediates intestinal secretion (Cox, H. M., et al., Br J Pharmacol 101(2):247-52 (1990); Playford, R. J., et al., Lancet 335(8705):1555-7 (1990)), and stimulate net absorption (MacFayden, R. J., et al., Neuropeptides 7(3):219-27 (1986)). Two major in vivo variants, PYY(1-36) and PYY(3-36), have been identified (e.g., Eberlein, G. A., et al., Peptides 10(4), 797-803 (1989)). The sequence of PYY, as well as peptide analogs and peptide derivatives thereof, are known in the art (e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,574,010 and 5,552,520).

Oxyntomodulin is a naturally occurring 37 amino acid peptide hormone found in the colon that has been found to suppress appetite and facilitate weight loss (Wynne K, et al., Int J Obes (Lond) 30(12):1729-36(2006)). The sequence of oxyntomodulin, as well as peptide analogs and peptide derivatives thereof, are known in the art (e.g., Bataille D, et al., Peptides 2(Suppl 2):41-44 (1981); and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2005/0070469 and 2006/0094652).

Gastric Inhibitory Peptide (GIP) is an insulinotrophic peptide hormone (Efendic et al., Horm Metab Res. 36:742-6 (2004)) and is secreted by the mucosa of the duodenum and jejunum in response to absorbed fat and carbohydrate that stimulate the pancreas to secrete insulin. GIP circulates as a biologically active 42-amino acid peptide. GIP is also known as glucose-dependent insulinotrophic protein. GIP is a 42-amino acid gastrointestinal regulatory peptide that stimulates insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells in the presence of glucose (Tseng et al., PNAS 90:1992-1996 (1993)). The sequence of GIP, as well as peptide analogs and peptide derivatives thereof, are known in the art (e.g., Meier, Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 21(2):91-117 (2005) and Efendic, Horm Metab Res. 36(11-12):742-6 (2004)).

Glucagon is a peptide hormone, produced by alpha cells of the pancreas, which raises the concentration of glucose in the bloodstream. Its effect is opposite that of insulin, which lowers the glucose concentration. The pancreas releases glucagon when the concentration of glucose in the bloodstream falls too low. Glucagon causes the liver to convert stored glycogen into glucose, which is released into the bloodstream. High blood glucose levels stimulate the release of insulin. Insulin allows glucose to be taken up and used by insulin-dependent tissues. Thus, glucagon and insulin are part of a feedback system that keeps blood glucose levels at a stable level.

Glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) is a 33 amino acid peptide with the sequence HADGSFSDEMNTILDNLAARDFINWLIQTKITD (SEQ ID NO: 3) in humans. GLP-2 is created by specific post-translational proteolytic cleavage of proglucagon in a process that also liberates the related glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). GLP-2 is produced by the intestinal endocrine L cell and by various neurons in the central nervous system. Intestinal GLP-2 is co-secreted along with GLP-1 upon nutrient ingestion. When externally administered, GLP-2 produces a number of effects in humans and rodents, including intestinal growth, enhancement of intestinal function, reduction in bone breakdown and neuroprotection. GLP-2 may act in an endocrine fashion to link intestinal growth and metabolism with nutrient intake.

Amylin, as well as analogs and derivatives thereof, are known in the art (e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,686,411, 5,814,600, 5,998,367, 6,114,304, 6,410,511, 6,608,029, and 6,610,824). For ease of reference, herein, the family of amylin polypeptides, amylin derivatives, variants and analogues are referred to collectively as amylin.

The cDNA sequence encoding the human leptin protein hormone is known (e.g., Masuzaki, H., et al. (Diabetes 44: 855-858, 1995)). Leptin, as well as analogs and derivatives thereof, are known in the art (e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,521,283, 5,525,705, 5,532,336, 5,552,522, 5,552,523, 5,552,524, 5,554,727, 5,559,208, 5,563,243, 5,563,244, 5,563,245, 5,567,678, 5,567,803, 5,569,743, 5,569,744, 5,574,133, 5,580,954, 5,594,101, 5,594,104, 5,605,886, 5,691,309, and 5,719,266; P.C.T. International Patent Publication Nos. WO96/22308, WO96/31526, WO96/34885, 97/46585, WO97/16550, and WO 97/20933; European Patent Publication No. EP 0 741 187). For ease of reference, herein, the family of leptin polypeptides, leptin derivatives, variants and analogues are referred to collectively as leptin.

Examples of half-lives of some of the peptides are as follows: the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, approximately 2.5 hours; GLP-1, approximately 2 minutes; GIP, approximately 5 minutes; PYY, approximately 8 minutes; glucagon, approximately 6 minutes; oxyntomodulin, approximately 6 minutes; and GLP-2, approximately 6 minutes.

Drug particle formulations for use in the practice of the present invention are exemplified using an exenatide. The examples are not intended to be limiting.

The drugs can also be in various forms including, but not limited to, the following: uncharged molecules; components of molecular complexes; and pharmacologically acceptable salts such as hydrochloride, hydrobromide, sulfate, laurates, palmatates, phosphate, nitrate, borate, acetate, maleate, tartrate, oleates, or salicylates. For acidic drugs, salts of metals, amines or organic cations, for example, quaternary ammonium, can be employed. Furthermore, simple derivatives of the drug such as esters, ethers, amides and the like that have solubility characteristics suitable for the purpose of the invention can also be used herein.

The above drugs and other drugs known to those of skill in the art are useful in methods of treatment for a variety of conditions including but not limited to the following: chronic pain, hemophilia and other blood disorders, endocrine disorders, metabolic disorders, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), Alzheimer's disease, cardiovascular diseases (e.g., heart failure, atherosclerosis, and acute coronary syndrome), rheumatologic disorders, diabetes (including type 1, type 2 diabetes mellitus, human immunodeficiency virus treatment-induced, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, and steroid-induced), hypoglycemia unawareness, restrictive lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lipoatrophy, metabolic syndrome, leukemia, hepatitis, renal failure, infectious diseases (including bacterial infection, viral infection (e.g., infection by human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, yellow fever virus, West Nile virus, Dengue virus, Marburg virus, and Ebola virus), and parasitic infection), hereditary diseases (such as cerbrosidase deficiency and adenosine deaminase deficiency), hypertension, septic shock, autoimmune diseases (e.g., Grave's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis), shock and wasting disorders, cystic fibrosis, lactose intolerance, Crohn's diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, gastrointestinal cancers (including colon cancer and rectal cancer), breast cancer, leukemia, lung cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreatic cancer, thyroid cancer, endometrial cancer, and other cancers. Further, some of the above agents are useful for the treatment of infectious diseases requiring chronic treatments including, but not limited to, tuberculosis, malaria, leishmaniasis, trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness and Chagas disease), and parasitic worms.

The amount of drug in drug particle formulations is that amount necessary to deliver a therapeutically effective amount of the agent to achieve the desired therapeutic result in the subject to which the drug is being delivered. In practice, this will vary depending upon such variables, for example, as the particular agent, the severity of the condition, and the desired therapeutic effect. Beneficial agents and their dosage unit amounts are known to the prior art in Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 11th Ed., (2005), McGraw Hill; Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th Ed., (1995), Mack Publishing Co.; and Martin's Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1.00 edition (2005), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Further, highly concentrated drug particles are described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010/0092566. Typically, for an osmotic delivery system, the volume of the chamber comprising the drug formulation is between about 100 μl to about 1000 more preferably between about 140 μl and about 200 μl. In one embodiment, the volume of the chamber comprising the drug formulation is about 160 μl.

Drug particle formulations of the invention are preferably chemically and physically stable for at least 1 month, preferably at least 3 months, more preferably at least 6 months, more preferably at least 12 months at delivery temperature, and preferably at least 24 months at delivery temperature. The delivery temperature is typically normal human body temperature, for example, about 37° C., or slightly higher, for example, about 40° C. Further, drug particle formulations of the present invention are preferably chemically and physically stable for at least 3 months, preferably at least 6 months, more preferably at least 12 months, and preferably at least 24 months at storage temperature. Examples of storage temperatures include refrigeration temperature, for example, about 5° C.; or room temperature, for example, about 25° C.

A drug particle formulation may be considered chemically stable if less than about 25%; preferably less than about 20%, preferably less than about 15%, more preferably less than about 10%, and more preferably less than about 5% breakdown products of the drug particles are formed after about 3 months, preferably after about 6 months, preferably after about 12 months at delivery temperature and after about 6 months, after about 12 months, and preferably after about 24 months at storage temperature.

A drug particle formulation may be considered physically stable if less than about 10%, preferably less than about 5%, preferably less than about 3%, more preferably less than 1% aggregates of the drug are formed after about 3 months, preferably after about 6 months, at delivery temperature and about 6 months, preferably about 12 months, and preferably about 24 months at storage temperature.

When the drug in the drug particle formulation is a protein, the protein solution is kept in a frozen condition and lyophilized or spray dried to a solid state. Tg (glass transition temperature) may be one factor to consider in achieving stable compositions of protein. While not intending to be bound by any particular theory, the theory of formation of a high Tg amorphous solid to stabilize peptides, polypeptides, or proteins has been utilized in pharmaceutical industry. Generally, if an amorphous solid has a higher Tg, such as 100° C., peptide products will not have mobility when stored at room temp or even at 40° C. because the storage temperature is below the Tg. Calculations using molecular information have shown that if a glass transition temperature is above a storage temperature of 50° C. that there is zero mobility for molecules. Zero mobility of molecules correlates with better stability. Tg is also dependent on the moisture concentration in the product formulation. Generally, the more moisture, the lower the Tg of the composition.

Accordingly, in some aspects of the present invention, excipients with higher Tg may be included in the protein formulation to improve stability, for example, sucrose (Tg=75° C.) and trehalose (Tg=110° C.). Preferably, particle formulations are formable into particles using processes such as spray drying, lyophilization, desiccation, freeze-drying, milling, granulation, ultrasonic drop creation, crystallization, precipitation, or other techniques available in the art for forming particles from a mixture of components. In one embodiment of the invention the particles are spray dried. The particles are preferably substantially uniform in shape and size.

The particles are typically sized such that they can be delivered via an implantable osmotic delivery device. Uniform shape and size of the particles typically helps to provide a consistent and uniform rate of release from such a delivery device; however, a particle preparation having a non-normal particle size distribution profile may also be used. For example, in a typical implantable osmotic delivery device having a delivery orifice, the size of the particles is less than about 30%, more preferably is less than about 20%, more preferably is less than about than 10%, of the diameter of the delivery orifice. In an embodiment of the particle formulation for use with an osmotic delivery system, wherein the delivery orifice diameter of the implant is about 0.5 mm, particle sizes may be, for example, less than about 150 microns to about 50 microns. In an embodiment of the particle formulation for use with an osmotic delivery system, wherein the delivery orifice diameter of the implant is about 0.1 mm, particle sizes may be, for example, less than about 30 microns to about 10 microns. In one embodiment, the orifice is about 0.25 mm (250 microns) and the particle size is about 2 microns to about 5 microns. Particles of the particle formation may be between 2 microns to less than 50 microns in diameter.

Typically, the particles of the particle formulations, when incorporated in a suspension vehicle, do not settle in less than about 3 months, preferably do not settle in less than about 6 months, more preferably do not settle in less than about 12 months, more preferably do not settle in less than about 24 months at delivery temperature, and most preferably do not settle in less than about 36 months at delivery temperature. The suspension vehicles typically have a viscosity of between about 5,000 to about 30,000 poise, preferably between about 8,000 to about 25,000 poise, more preferably between about 10,000 to about 20,000 poise. In one embodiment, the suspension vehicle has a viscosity of about 15,000 poise, plus or minus about 3,000 poise. Generally speaking, smaller particles tend to have a lower settling rate in viscous suspension vehicles than larger particles. Accordingly, micron- to nano-sized particles are typically desirable. In viscous suspension formulation, particles of about 2 microns to about 7 microns of the present invention will not settle for at least 20 years at room temperature based on simulation modeling studies. In an embodiment of the particle formulation of the present invention, for use in an implantable osmotic delivery device, particles have sizes of less than about 50 microns, more preferably less than about 10 microns, more preferably in a range from about 2 microns to about 7 microns.

In one embodiment, a drug particle formulation comprises a drug, as described above, one or more stabilizers, and optionally a buffer. The stabilizers may be, for example, carbohydrate, antioxidant, amino acid, buffer, inorganic compound, or surfactant. The amounts of stabilizers and buffer in the particle formulation can be determined experimentally based on the activities of the stabilizers and buffers and the desired characteristics of the formulation, in view of the teachings of the present specification. Typically, the amount of carbohydrate in the formulation is determined by aggregation concerns. In general, the carbohydrate amount should not be too high so as to avoid promoting crystal growth in the presence of water due to excess carbohydrate unbound to drug. Typically, the amount of antioxidant in the formulation is determined by oxidation concerns, while the amount of amino acid in the formulation is determined by oxidation concerns and/or formability of particles during spray drying. Typically, the amount of buffer in the formulation is determined by pre-processing concerns, stability concerns, and formability of particles during spray drying. Buffer may be required to stabilize drug during processing, e.g., solution preparation and spray drying, when all excipients are solubilized.

Examples of carbohydrates that may be included in the particle formulation include, but are not limited to, monosaccharides (e.g., fructose, maltose, galactose, glucose, D-mannose, and sorbose), disaccharides (e.g., lactose, sucrose, trehalose, and cellobiose), polysaccharides (e.g., raffinose, melezitose, maltodextrins, dextrans, and starches), and alditols (acyclic polyols; e.g., mannitol, xylitol, maltitol, lactitol, xylitol sorbitol, pyranosyl sorbitol, and myoinsitol). Preferred carbohydrates include disaccharides and/or non-reducing sugars, such as sucrose, trehalose, and raffinose.

Examples of antioxidants that may be included in the particle formulation include, but are not limited to, methionine, ascorbic acid, sodium thiosulfate, catalase, platinum, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid, cysteins, thioglycerol, thioglycolic acid, thiosorbitol, butylated hydroxanisol, butylated hydroxyltoluene, and propyl gallate. Further, amino acids that readily oxidize can be used as antioxidants, for example, cysteine, methionine, and tryptophan. A preferred antioxidant is methionine.

Examples of amino acids that may be included in the particle formulation include, but are not limited to, arginine, methionine, glycine, histidine, alanine, L-leucine, glutamic acid, iso-leucine, L-threonine, 2-phenylamine, valine, norvaline, praline, phenylalanine, tryptophan, serine, asparagines, cysteine, tyrosine, lysine, and norleucine. Preferred amino acids include those that readily oxidize, e.g., cysteine, methionine, and tryptophan.

Examples of buffers that may be included in the particle formulation include, but are not limited to, citrate, histidine, succinate, phosphate, maleate, tris, acetate, carbohydrate, and gly-gly. Preferred buffers include citrate, histidine, succinate, and tris.

Examples of inorganic compounds that may be included in the particle formulation include, but are not limited to, NaCl, Na₂SO₄, NaHCO₃, KCl, KH₂PO₄, CaCl₂, and MgCl₂.

In addition, the particle formulation may include other excipients, such as surfactants, and salts. Examples of surfactants include, but are not limited to, Polysorbate 20, Polysorbate 80, PLURONIC® (BASF Corporation, Mount Olive, N.J.) F68, and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Examples of salts include, but are not limited to, sodium chloride, calcium chloride, and magnesium chloride.

All components included in the particle formulation are typically acceptable for pharmaceutical use in mammals, in particular, in humans.

In summary, a selected drug or combination of drugs is formulated into dried powders in solid state, which preserve maximum chemical and biological stability of the drug. The particle formulation offers long-term storage stability at high temperature, and therefore, allows delivery to a subject of stable and biologically effective drug for extended periods of time.

3.2.0 Vehicle Formulations and Suspension Formulations

In one aspect, the suspension vehicle provides a stable environment in which the drug particle formulation is dispersed. The drug particle formulations are chemically and physically stable (as described above) in the suspension vehicle. The suspension vehicle typically comprises one or more polymer and one or more solvents that form a solution of sufficient viscosity to uniformly suspend the particles comprising the drug. The suspension vehicle may comprise further components, including, but not limited to, surfactants, antioxidants, and/or other compounds soluble in the vehicle.

The viscosity of the suspension vehicle is typically sufficient to prevent the drug particle formulation from settling during storage and use in a method of delivery, for example, in an implantable, osmotic delivery device. The suspension vehicle is biodegradable in that the suspension vehicle disintegrates or breaks down over a period of time in response to a biological environment, while the drug particle is dissolved in the biological environment and the active pharmaceutical ingredient (i.e., the drug) in the particle is absorbed.

The solvent in which the polymer is dissolved may affect characteristics of the suspension formulation, such as the behavior of drug particle formulation during storage. A solvent may be selected in combination with a polymer so that the resulting suspension vehicle exhibits phase separation upon contact with the aqueous environment. In some embodiments of the invention, the solvent may be selected in combination with the polymer so that the resulting suspension vehicle exhibits phase separation upon contact with the aqueous environment having less than about 10% water.

The solvent may be an acceptable solvent that is not miscible with water. The solvent may also be selected so that the polymer is soluble in the solvent at high concentrations, such as at a polymer concentration of greater than about 30%. Examples of solvents useful in the practice of the present invention include, but are not limited to, lauryl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, benzyl alcohol, lauryl lactate, decanol (also called decyl alcohol), ethyl hexyl lactate, and long chain (C₈ to C₂₄) aliphatic alcohols, esters, or mixtures thereof. The solvent used in the suspension vehicle may be “dry,” in that it has a low moisture content. Preferred solvents for use in formulation of the suspension vehicle include lauryl lactate, lauryl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, and mixtures thereof.

Examples of polymers for formulation of the suspension vehicles of the present invention include, but are not limited to, a polyester (e.g., polylactic acid and polylactic polyglycolic acid), a polymer comprising pyrrolidones (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone having a molecular weight ranging from approximately 2,000 to approximately 1,000,000), ester or ether of an unsaturated alcohol (e.g., vinyl acetate), polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene block copolymer, or mixtures thereof. Polyvinylpyrrolidone can be characterized by its K-value (e.g., K-17), which is a viscosity index. In one embodiment, the polymer is polyvinylpyrrolidone having a molecular weight of 2,000 to 1,000,000. In a preferred embodiment the polymer is polyvinylpyrrolidone K-17 (typically having an approximate average molecular weight range of 7,900-10,800). The polymer used in the suspension vehicle may include one or more different polymers or may include different grades of a single polymer. The polymer used in the suspension vehicle may also be dry or have low moisture content.

Generally speaking, a suspension vehicle for use in the present invention may vary in composition based on the desired performance characteristics. In one embodiment, the suspension vehicle may comprise about 40 wt % to about 80 wt % polymer(s) and about 20 wt % to about 60 wt % solvent(s). Preferred embodiments of a suspension vehicle include vehicles formed of polymer(s) and solvent(s) combined at the following ratios: about 25 wt % solvent and about 75 wt % polymer; about 50 wt % solvent and about 50 wt % polymer; about 75 wt % solvent and about 25 wt % polymer. Accordingly, in some embodiments the suspension vehicle may comprise selected components and in other embodiments consist essentially of selected components.

The suspension vehicle may exhibit Newtonian behavior. The suspension vehicle is typically formulated to provide a viscosity that maintains a uniform dispersion of the particle formulation for a predetermined period of time. This helps facilitate making a suspension formulation tailored to provide controlled delivery of the drug contained in the drug particle formulation. The viscosity of the suspension vehicle may vary depending on the desired application, the size and type of the particle formulation, and the loading of the particle formulation in the suspension vehicle. The viscosity of the suspension vehicle may be varied by altering the type or relative amount of the solvent or polymer used.

The suspension vehicle may have a viscosity ranging from about 100 poise to about 1,000,000 poise, preferably from about 1,000 poise to about 100,000 poise. In preferred embodiments, the suspension vehicles typically have a viscosity, at 33° C., of between about 5,000 to about 30,000 poise, preferably between about 8,000 to about 25,000 poise, more preferably between about 10,000 to about 20,000 poise. In one embodiment, the suspension vehicle has a viscosity of about 15,000 poise, plus or minus about 3,000 poise, at 33° C. The viscosity may be measured at 33° C., at a shear rate of 10′/sec, using a parallel plate rheometer.

The suspension vehicle may exhibit phase separation when contacted with the aqueous environment; however, typically the suspension vehicle exhibits substantially no phase separation as a function of temperature. For example, at a temperature ranging from approximately 0° C. to approximately 70° C. and upon temperature cycling, such as cycling from 4° C. to 37° C. to 4° C., the suspension vehicle typically exhibits no phase separation.

The suspension vehicle may be prepared by combining the polymer and the solvent under dry conditions, such as in a dry box. The polymer and solvent may be combined at an elevated temperature, such as from approximately 40° C. to approximately 70° C., and allowed to liquefy and form the single phase. The ingredients may be blended under vacuum to remove air bubbles produced from the dry ingredients. The ingredients may be combined using a conventional mixer, such as a dual helix blade or similar mixer, set at a speed of approximately 40 rpm. However, higher speeds may also be used to mix the ingredients. Once a liquid solution of the ingredients is achieved, the suspension vehicle may be cooled to room temperature. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) may be used to verify that the suspension vehicle is a single phase. Further, the components of the vehicle (e.g., the solvent and/or the polymer) may be treated to substantially reduce or substantially remove peroxides (e.g., by treatment with methionine; see, e.g., U.S., Patent Application Publication No. 2007-0027105).

The drug particle formulation is added to the suspension vehicle to form a suspension formulation. In some embodiments the suspension formulation may comprise a drug particle formulation and a suspension vehicle and in other embodiments consist essentially of a drug particle formulation and a suspension vehicle.

The suspension formulation may be prepared by dispersing the particle formulation in the suspension vehicle. The suspension vehicle may be heated and the particle formulation added to the suspension vehicle under dry conditions. The ingredients may be mixed under vacuum at an elevated temperature, such as from about 40° C. to about 70° C. The ingredients may be mixed at a sufficient speed, such as from about 40 rpm to about 120 rpm, and for a sufficient amount of time, such as about 15 minutes, to achieve a uniform dispersion of the particle formulation in the suspension vehicle. The mixer may be a dual helix blade or other suitable mixer. The resulting mixture may be removed from the mixer, sealed in a dry container to prevent water from contaminating the suspension formulation, and allowed to cool to room temperature before further use, for example, loading into an implantable, drug delivery device, unit dose container, or multiple-dose container.

The suspension formulation typically has an overall moisture content of less than about 10 wt %, preferably less than about 5 wt %, and more preferably less than about 4 wt %.

In preferred embodiments, the suspension formulations of the present invention are substantially homogeneous and flowable to provide delivery of the drug particle formulation from the osmotic delivery device to the subject.

In summary, the components of the suspension vehicle provide biocompatibility. Components of the suspension vehicle offer suitable chemico-physical properties to form stable suspensions of drug particle formulations. These properties include, but are not limited to, the following: viscosity of the suspension; purity of the vehicle; residual moisture of the vehicle; density of the vehicle; compatibility with the dry powders; compatibility with implantable devices; molecular weight of the polymer; stability of the vehicle; and hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of the vehicle. These properties can be manipulated and controlled, for example, by variation of the vehicle composition and manipulation of the ratio of components used in the suspension vehicle.

4.0.0 Delivery of Suspension Formulations

The suspension formulations described herein may be used in an implantable, osmotic delivery device to provide zero-order, continuous, controlled, and sustained delivery of a compound over an extended period of time, such as over weeks, months, or up to about one year or more. Such an implantable osmotic delivery device is typically capable of delivering the suspension formulation, comprising the drug, at a desired flow rate over a desired period of time. The suspension formulation may be loaded into the implantable, osmotic delivery device by conventional techniques.

A dose and delivery rate can be selected to achieve a desired blood concentration of a drug generally within about 6 half-lives of the drug within the subject after implantation of the device. The blood concentration of the drug is selected to give the optimal therapeutic effects of the drug while avoiding undesirable side effects that may be induced by excess concentration of the drug, while at the same time avoiding peaks and troughs that may induce side effects associated with peak or trough plasma concentrations of the drug.

The implantable, osmotic delivery device typically includes a reservoir having at least one orifice through which the suspension formulation is delivered. The suspension formulation may be stored within the reservoir. In a preferred embodiment, the implantable, drug delivery device is an osmotic delivery device, wherein delivery of the drug is osmotically driven. Some osmotic delivery devices and their component parts have been described, for example, the DUROS® delivery device or similar devices (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,609,885; 5,728,396; 5,985,305; 5,997,527; 6,113,938; 6,132,420; 6,156,331; 6,217,906; 6,261,584; 6,270,787; 6,287,295; 6,375,978; 6,395,292; 6,508,808; 6,544,252; 6,635,268; 6,682,522; 6,923,800; 6,939,556; 6,976,981; 6,997,922; 7,014,636; 7,207,982; 7,112,335; and 7,163,688; U.S. Pat. Pub. Nos. 2005/0175701, 2007/0281024, 2008/0091176, and 2009/0202608).

The DUROS® delivery device typically consists of a cylindrical reservoir which contains the osmotic engine, piston, and drug formulation. The reservoir is capped at one end by a controlled-rate, semi-permeable membrane and capped at the other end by a diffusion moderator through which suspension formulation, comprising the drug, is released from the drug reservoir. The piston separates the drug formulation from the osmotic engine and utilizes a seal to prevent the water in the osmotic engine compartment from entering the drug reservoir. The diffusion moderator is designed, in conjunction with the drug formulation, to prevent body fluid from entering the drug reservoir through the orifice.

The DUROS® device releases a drug at a predetermined rate based on the principle of osmosis. Extracellular fluid enters the DUROS® device through a semi-permeable membrane directly into a salt engine that expands to drive the piston at a slow and even delivery rate. Movement of the piston forces the drug formulation to be released through the orifice or exit port at a predetermined sheer rate. In one embodiment of the present invention, the reservoir of the DUROS® device is load with a suspension formulation wherein the device is capable of delivering the suspension formulation to a subject over an extended period of time (e.g., about 1, about 3, about 6, about 9, about 10, about 12 months, and about 24 months) at a pre-determined, therapeutically effective delivery rate.

The release rate of the drug from the osmotic delivery device typically provides a subject with a predetermined target dose of a drug, for example, a therapeutically effective daily dose delivered over the course of a day; that is, the release rate of the drug from the device, provides substantial steady-state delivery of the drug at a therapeutic concentration to the subject.

Typically, for an osmotic delivery device, the volume of a beneficial agent chamber comprising the beneficial agent formulation is between about 100 μl to about 1000 more preferably between about 120 μl and about 500 μl, more preferably between about 150 μl and about 200 μl. Most preferably the volume is 160 μl.

Typically, the osmotic delivery device is implanted within the subject, for example, subdermally or subcutaneously to provide subcutaneous drug delivery. The device(s) can be implanted subdermally or subcutaneously into either or both arms (e.g., in the inside, outside, or back of the upper arm), into the back, into a buttocks, into a thigh, or into the abdomen. Any body part comprising subcutaneous or subdermal fat is an acceptable site for implantation of an osmotic delivery device. Preferred locations in the abdominal area are under the abdominal skin in the area extending below the ribs and above the belt line. To provide a number of locations for implantation of one or more osmotic delivery device within the abdomen, the abdominal wall can e.g., be divided into 4 quadrants as follows: the upper right quadrant extending 5-8 centimeters below the right ribs and about 5-8 centimeters to the right of the midline, the lower right quadrant extending 5-8 centimeters above the belt line and 5-8 centimeters to the right of the midline, the upper left quadrant extending 5-8 centimeters below the left ribs and about 5-8 centimeters to the left of the midline, and the lower left quadrant extending 5-8 centimeters above the belt line and 5-8 centimeters to the left of the midline. This provides multiple available locations for implantation of one or more devices on one or more occasions. Implantation and removal of osmotic delivery devices are generally carried out by medical professionals using local anesthesia (e.g., lidocaine).

Termination of treatment by removal of an osmotic delivery device from a subject is straightforward, and provides the important advantage of immediate cessation of delivery of the drug to the subject.

Preferably, the osmotic delivery device has a fail-safe mechanism to prevent an inadvertent excess or bolus delivery of drug in a theoretical situation like the plugging or clogging of the outlet (diffusion moderator) through which the drug formulation is delivered. To prevent an inadvertent excess or bolus delivery of drug the osmotic delivery device is designed and constructed such that the pressure needed to partially or wholly dislodge or expel the diffusion moderator from the reservoir exceeds the pressure needed to partially or wholly dislodge or expel the semi-permeable membrane to the extent necessary to de-pressurize the reservoir. In such a scenario, pressure would build within the device until it would push the semi-permeable membrane at the other end outward, thereby releasing the osmotic pressure. The osmotic delivery device would then become static and no longer deliver the drug formulation provided that the piston is in a sealing relationship with the reservoir.

The suspension formulations may also be used in infusion pumps, for example, the ALZET® (DURECT Corporation, Cupertino, Calif.) osmotic pumps which are miniature, infusion pumps for the continuous dosing of laboratory animals (e.g., mice and rats).

5.0.0 Exemplary Advantages of Certain Aspects of the Present Invention

In one aspect, the present invention relates to methods of treatment with continuous delivery of insulinotrophic peptides (e.g., an exenatide), for example, by use of an implantable osmotic delivery device. Experiments described herein have demonstrated that continuous delivery of an exenatide using an implantable osmotic delivery device, provided the following benefits for subjects in need of treatment: treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, improving glycemic control (as measured, e.g., by glucose levels, HbA1c, and/or fructosamine), reducing HbA1c, reducing fasting plasma glucose, reducing post-prandial blood glucose levels, reducing adverse gastrointestinal events (e.g., nausea and vomiting) relative to twice-daily injections, weight loss, reducing LDL-C, reducing systolic blood pressure, treating hypertension, reducing fructosamine levels, and improving of quality of life for subjects undergoing treatment.

In addition, the continuous delivery of insulinotrophic peptides (e.g., an exenatide) may be used in the practice of the following methods: treating obesity, controlling appetite, reducing caloric intake, reducing food intake, suppressing appetite, inducing anorexia, treating impaired glucose tolerance, treating post-prandial hyperglycemia, treating post-prandial dumping syndrome, treating hyperglycemic conditions, reducing triglycerides, reducing cholesterol, increasing urine flow, decreasing potassium concentration in the urine, alleviating toxic hypervolemia, inducing rapid diuresis, pre-surgical patient preparation, post-surgical patient treatment, increasing renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate, treating pre-eclampsia or eclampsia during pregnancy, increasing cardiac contractility, treating renal failure, treating congestive heart failure, treating nephrotic syndrome, treating pulmonary edema, treating systemic edema, treating cirrhosis, treating impaired glucose tolerance, treating pre-diabetes (blood glucose levels that are higher than normal but not yet high enough to be diagnosed as diabetes), treating type 1 diabetes mellitus (e.g., in combination with insulin), reducing risk of a cardiovascular event due to impaired glucose tolerance, reducing risk of a cerebrovascular event due to impaired glucose tolerance, delaying the progression of diabetes, ameliorating diabetes, delaying diabetes onset, inducing (3-cell preservation and restoring (3-cell functionality, restoring normoglycemia, providing euglycemic control, treating peripheral vascular disease, treating acute coronary syndrome, treating cardiomyopathy, treating gestational diabetes, treating polycystic ovary syndrome, treating or preventing nephropathy, and treating diabetes induced by a variety of diseases or conditions (for example, steroid induced diabetes, human immunodeficiency virus treatment-induced diabetes, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hypoglycemia unawareness, restrictive lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular diseases, e.g., heart failure, atherosclerosis, and acute coronary syndrome, lipoatrophy, metabolic syndrome, and treating Alzheimer's disease).

The present invention also provides treatment methods for delivery of an insulinotrophic peptide having the following advantages. The continuous delivery from, for example, an osmotic delivery device, ensures 100% treatment compliance for subjects and avoids the need for twice-daily, daily, weekly, or even monthly injections because the devices described herein can deliver an incretin mimetic for time periods of up to a about year or two years. Avoidance of self-injection is a particular advantage for a subject who is needle phobic. Further, use of implantable devices for continuous delivery provides treatment convenience and avoids scheduling conflicts, for example, with meals, and also eliminates the inconvenience of administration of a drug by injection, as when subjects are in public or busy with daily activities. Also, frequent self-administration of a drug reminds subjects of their disease state and carries a stigma associated with the disease and/or treatment; whereas continuous delivery of a drug from an implanted osmotic delivery device may offer subjects some respite from such reminders and stigma.

The present invention also provides methods to treat subjects at dosage levels of insulinotrophic peptides previously thought to be higher than tolerable dosage levels. For example, continuous delivery of an exenatide is described herein for dosages tolerated at least up to 80 μg/day.

In another aspect the present invention provides methods of dosage escalation. In one embodiment, multiple devices for continuous delivery of a drug, for example, an insulinotrophic peptide, are provided. Each device is capable of delivering a particular drug dose per day. A low-dose device is initially implanted, followed by removal and implantation of a higher daily dose device. Alternatively, the first device may be kept in place and a second device implanted to increase the daily dose. In another alternative, a subject may be started by dosing with an injectable form of the drug (e.g., twice-daily, once-daily, once-weekly, and once- or twice-monthly injection) and transitioned to an implantable device to provide continuous delivery after an initial period. Such transitioning from injectable to implantable may, for example, allow subjects or physicians to try a drug and perhaps be observed for any immediate adverse effects before implantation of a device. Injectable to implantable transitions may also be useful for treatment of subjects who are particularly nervous about possible drug side effects. Also, providing the drug by injection or by continuous delivery at low dose may permit tolerization of the drug at low dose before changing to higher and more efficacious therapeutic doses.

Optimal time periods are determined for a drug concerning how long an initial device remains in place before replacement with a higher dose delivery device. Similarly optimal time periods are determined for how long an initial phase of treatment by injection goes on before implantation of an osmotic delivery device. For example, treatment is commenced at a low dose with low incidence of side effects (e.g., for about 2 weeks, about 3 months, about 6 months, about 9 months, and about a year). The subject adjusts to that dose and subsequently a higher dose delivery device is implanted providing dose escalation. Alternatively, a subject who has been treated with an injectable form dose escalates to an implantable osmotic delivery device. Such dose escalations were shown from the data presented herein to achieve additional benefits in glucose regulation and weight loss through at least 39 weeks. Examples of initial dosages include, but are not limited to, delivery of about 1 μg/day to about 20 μg/day, followed by dose escalation to about 5 μg/day to about 1,000 μg/day. Preferably, escalation of insulinotrophic peptide doses include, but are not limited to, the following: about 10 μg/day followed by about 20 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 10 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 20 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 15 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 30 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 40 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 20 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 50 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 40 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 60 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day; about 50 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day; about 60 μg/day followed by about 70 μg/day or about 60 μg/day followed by about 80 μg/day. In one embodiment, the present invention includes kits and methods for manufacturing kits comprising one or more lower dose osmotic delivery devices and one or more higher dose osmotic delivery devices (the lower and higher dosages being relative to the other devices in the kit). Such kits may optionally include an implanter, lidocaine, and sterile field/supplies.

Generally, dose escalation is from a low dose of insulinotrophic peptide, for example, about 1 μg/day to about 30 μg/day, to a high dose of greater than the low dose to at least about 80 μg/day.

In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of treating diabetes without a substantial increase in insulin secretion using an insulinotrophic peptide. In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the present invention the insulinotrophic peptide is an exenatide. Data obtained in the course of the studies described herein demonstrated that, at higher doses of continuous delivery of the exenatide (e.g., 20 μg/day, 40 μg/day, and 80 μg/day), effective treatment of diabetes was achieved in the absence of an increase in insulin production. Insulin levels were measured by an RIA, a chromatographic method, an ECL assay, an ELISA, or an IEMA.

In another aspect, the methods of the present invention allow for the administration of a drug, e.g., an insulinotrophic peptide, without a substantial initial drug burst that typically occurs with depot injections (e.g., initial drug burst of from about 5% of total drug in depot formulation to about 1% of total drug in depot formulation) that provide sustained delivery over a period of time (e.g., depot injections formulated using poly(lactides), poly(glycolides), poly(lactide-co-glycolides), poly(lactic acid)s, poly(glycolic acid)s, poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid)s and blends and copolymers thereof).

In a further aspect the present invention is directed to methods of providing greater reduction in plasma blood glucose in a shorter time period (e.g., within the first day and to day 5) than can be achieved using twice-daily daily injections, comprising providing continuous delivery of an insulinotrophic peptide, for example, an exenatide. In one embodiment, continuous delivery is achieved by use of an implantable osmotic delivery device.

Another advantage of the present invention is the ability to remove the delivery device providing continuous delivery of the drug and provide rapid termination of drug delivery for any reason, for example, in the case of myocardial infarction, pregnancy, pancreatitis or suspected pancreatitis, emergency medical care (e.g., termination of drug therapies), or adverse drug reactions.

The present invention uniquely addresses unmet needs relative to injectable incretin mimetics. For example, one shortcoming of a twice-daily injectable exenatide is that greater than 65% of subjects are not treated to or maintained at HbA1c treatment goals. Another disadvantage of a twice-daily injectable exenatide is that greater than 65% of these subjects become noncompliant between 6-12 months when attempting to adhere to the injection treatment schedule. Also, 65% of subjects treated with a twice-daily injectable exenatide are overweight and need sustained weight loss.

Experiments described previously demonstrated that the methods of and osmotic delivery devices comprising an exenatide for use in methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus by continuous delivery as set forth by the present invention provide sustained treatment of subjects at target doses, complete subject compliance with the treatment, and sustained weight loss. A target dose typically provides substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide at a therapeutic concentration to the subject.

The data presented in the Experimental section herein demonstrate that the present invention provides methods of and osmotic delivery devices comprising exenatides for use in methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus by continuous delivery, wherein substantial steady-state delivery of the exenatide at therapeutic concentrations is achieved within a time period of about 7 days or less, about 6 days or less, about 5 days or less, about 4 days or less, about 3 days or less, preferably about 2 days or less, more preferably about 1 day or less, and preferably within the first day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject.

The data also demonstrate that the present invention provides methods of and osmotic delivery devices comprising exenatides for use in methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus by continuous delivery, wherein a significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose concentration, relative to the fasting plasma glucose concentration before implantation, is achieved after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject within a time period of between within the first day to about 7 days or less, about 6 days or less, about 5 days or less, about 4 days or less, about 3 days or less, preferably about 2 days or less, more preferably about 1 day or less, and more preferably within the first day after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject.

The data also demonstrate that the present invention provides the capability to terminate the continuous delivery such that the concentration of an exenatide is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject, after termination of continuous delivery, within about 6 half-lives of the drug after termination of continuous delivery, within about 5 half-lives of the drug after termination of continuous delivery, within about 4 half-lives of the drug after termination of continuous delivery, or within about 3 half-lives of the drug after termination of continuous delivery.

Further, the data show that treatment by continuous delivery of an exenatide provided better decreases in HbA1c than treatment by injection. In particular, subjects experienced a decrease in HbA1c % over the administration period of at least about 0.5%, at least about 1.0%, at least about 1.5%, at least about 2.0%, at least about 2.5%, at least about 3.0%, at least about 3.5%, at least about 4.0%, at least about 4.5%, at least about 5.0%, at least about 5.5%, or at least about 6.0% from baseline over the administration period or a reduction in the amount of HbA1c in the subject's serum of at least about 35 percent, at least about 40 percent, at least about 45 percent, at least about 50 percent, or at least about 55 percent at the end of an administration period relative to the beginning of the administration period.

Also, the data illustrate that the methods of and osmotic delivery devices comprising an exenatide for use in methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus by continuous delivery as described herein provide improved tolerization to dose escalation of the exenatide relative to injection of the exenatide.

In addition, these data presented herein demonstrate a significant advantage of the implanted osmotic delivery device of the present invention over an exenatide's administration via injection in terms of reported quality of life for treated subjects.

The comparative data described below demonstrate the superior treatment outcomes using the methods of and osmotic delivery devices comprising an exenatide for use in methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus by continuous delivery of the present invention, in combination with metformin therapy, relative to other treatment methods. Such other treatment methods include twice-daily injection of an exenatide, once-weekly injection of an exenatide, once-daily injection of liraglutide, once-weekly injection of taspoglutide, once-daily orally administered sitagliptin, and once-daily orally administered pioglitazone.

In summary, the methods of and osmotic delivery devices comprising an insulinotrophic peptide, for example, an exenatide, for use in methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus by continuous delivery as described herein provide a new standard of effective treatment. The present invention provides superior HbA1c reduction, improved weight loss through at least 39 weeks, and complete compliance, as well as long-term glycemic control relative to the use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (e.g., sitagliptin), thiazolidinediones (TZDs) (e.g., pioglitazone), other injectable incretin mimetics (e.g., liraglutide and taspoglutide), and twice-daily or once-weekly injection of an exenatide. Further, the present invention provides better insulinotrophic peptide treatment tolerability because no self-injections are required and the methods of and osmotic delivery devices comprising an insulinotrophic peptide for use in methods of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus by continuous delivery provide improved gastrointestinal tolerance.

The present invention relates to use of the ITCA 650 (a once- or twice-yearly continuous subcutaneous delivery of exenatide) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The ITCA 650 is a matchstick-size, miniature osmotic pump that is placed sub-dermally to provide continuous and consistent drug therapy via a proprietary formulation technology, which maintains stability of therapeutic proteins and peptides at human body temperatures for extended periods of time. Exenatide, the active agent in ITCA 650, is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist currently marketed globally as twice-daily and once-weekly self-injection therapies for type 2 diabetes. ITCA 650 represents the first injection-free GLP-1 therapy that can deliver a full year of treatment from a single placement of a 6 month or 12 month subcutaneous mini-pump.

ITCA 650 has been the focus of four global phase 3 clinical trial programs called FREEDOM. The FREEDOM clinical program is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ITCA 650 (continuous subcutaneous delivery of exenatide) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Over the four phase 3 clinical trials, it is expected that 5,000 patients at more than 500 clinical trial sites in more than 30 countries will be enrolled. The clinical studies will cover a broad range of patients whose diabetes is not controlled by oral anti-diabetes medications including metformin and metformin-based combinations.

The FREEDOM-1 Clinical Trial

The FREEDOM-1 study is a placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial that tested the efficacy and safety against placebo of ITCA 650 in patients with type 2 diabetes patients whose HbA1c is not controlled on diet and exercise alone, or in many cases, up two or three oral anti-diabetes drugs. Subjects enrolled in the trial had HbA1c measures between 7.5% and 10.0%. 460 patients were randomized into three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio, evaluating ITCA 650 40 mcg/day and 60 mcg/day versus placebo. Subjects in the active arms were treated for the first 13 weeks with 3-month devices that deliver an initial dose of 20 mcg/day, and then treated with 6-month ITCA 650 at doses of 40 mcg/day or 60 mcg/day. The Primary Endpoint was HbA1c reduction over 39 weeks. Secondary endpoints included changes in weight, and the percent of subjects reaching an HbA1c goal of <7%.

The now completed FREEDOM-1 study showed that ITCA 650 demonstrated positive results when added to standard oral diabetes medications. All endpoints were met regarding HbA1c and weight reductions, as well as the percent of patients treated to goal. Pre-specified sub-group analyses on HbA1c reductions over time also showed clinically and statistically significant impact, including substantial improvement in hyperglycemia, across a wide spectrum of patients and background medications. Significant HbA1c reductions were observed over the 39 weeks ranging from a mean of 1.4% to 1.7% across the majority of patients, with the highest reductions in patients on background metformin. Subjects with a starting baseline HbA1c above 8.5% had mean reductions up to 2.1%. Both the 40 mcg/day and 60 mcg/day mini-pumps demonstrated statistically significant results vs. control and were well tolerated. The FREEDOM-1 study demonstrated ITCA 650 to be significantly superior to placebo for both 40 mcg/day and 60 mcg/day doses, and met all its clinical endpoints.

The FREEDOM-1 High Baseline (HBL) Clinical Trial

Concurrent with FREEDOM-1, a second open-label phase 3 study called FREEDOM-1 HBL (high baseline) was conducted for patients who met all eligibility criteria for FREEDOM-1, but whose baseline HbA1c was greater than 10% (>10%) but less or equal than 12% (≤12%). All patients in this study were treated with ITCA 650 20 mcg/day for the first 3 months and with ITCA 650 60 mcg/day for the next 6 months. Pre-study oral anti-diabetic agents (OADs) were maintained unchanged for the 39 weeks (9 months) of treatment. Subjects in the FREEDOM-1 HBL had high baseline HbA1c levels despite many being on multi-drug therapy when screened into the study.

The now completed FREEDOM-1 HBL trial showed a sustained reduction of 3.4% in HbA1c (from a mean starting baseline of 10.8%) among these treatment-refractory and poorly controlled patients. The HBL study also showed the ability of a 39-week therapy with ITCA 650 to bring 25% of these patients, many uncontrolled on multi-drug therapy, to their HbA1c goal of <7%.

Both studies also showed a G.I. tolerability profile with nausea rates over time in the low single digits and a low single digit discontinuation rate for nausea.

Overall, both studies demonstrated that ITCA 650 provides sustained blood sugar control for many type 2 diabetes patients who are not achieving their goals—and without the need for regular self-injections. The data clearly indicated that the ITCA 650 method of delivery (i.e., a continuous, zero-order kinetic administration of exenatide) results in clinical and statistical significant changes in HbA1c and improvement in glycemic control. The ITCA 650 will help physicians to better manage this serious disease; it represents a new and transformational way of delivering important medicines in treatment of this devastating and growing worldwide epidemic.

EXAMPLES

The following examples are put forth so as to provide those of ordinary skill in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how to practice the present invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of what the inventors regard as the invention. Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers used (e.g., amounts, concentrations, and percent changes) but some experimental errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unless indicated otherwise, temperature is in degrees Centigrade and pressure is at or near atmospheric.

The compositions used to practice the methods of the present invention meet the specifications for content and purity required of pharmaceutical products. Further examples of suspension formulations comprising insulinotrophic peptide can be found in U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2006/0193918, 2008/0260840, and 2010/0092566.

Example 1 A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ITCA 650 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

A Phase 3 clinical trial was designed as a double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-center study to determine whether ITCA 650 60 μg/day or 40 μg/day is superior to ITCA placebo reducing HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes following 39 weeks of treatment.

Efficacy and safety of ITCA 650 versus ITCA placebo was studied during a 39-week treatment period. The study device (ITCA 650 or ITCA placebo) was placed on day 0, replaced at week 13 and removed at week 39. Group 1 was initially treated with an ITCA 650 20 μg/day device for 13 weeks. After 13 weeks, the ITCA 650 20 μg/day device was replaced with an ITCA 650 40 μg/day device for 26 weeks. At week 39 the ITCA 650 40 μg/day device was removed. This dosage scheme and members of this group are hereinafter in this Example referred to as ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day. Group 2 was initially treated with an ITCA 650 20 μg/day device for 13 weeks. After 13 weeks the ITCA 650 20 μg/day device was replaced with an ITCA 650 60 μg/day device for 26 weeks. At week 39 the ITCA 650 60 μg/day device was removed. This dosage scheme and members of this group are hereinafter in this Example referred to as ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day. Group 3 had an ITCA placebo in place for 13 weeks. At week 13 the ITCA placebo device was replaced with a new ITCA placebo device for 26 weeks. At week 39 the ITCA placebo device was removed. The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population includes all patients from the safety population who had a valid baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c value. The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) endpoint is defined as the last non-missing, on-treatment observation that is measured after baseline. Subjects who received rescue therapy were included in the mITT population. The 39 week study is represented graphically in FIG. 1.

A. Demographics of Study Group

Inclusion criteria were as follows. Subjects were 18-80 years of age and diagnosed as having type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least three months prior to screening. Subjects had been on a stable treatment regimen of diet and exercise alone or in combination with a stable and optimal or near-optimal dose of metformin, sulfonylurea, TZD, or combination of these drugs for at least three months. Subjects had a stable body weight (not varying by >10% for at least three months. Calcitonin levels of <50 ng/L (50 μg/mL) and a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m² and kg/m² at time of screening. Women of childbearing potential must have had a negative pregnancy test at Screening. HbA1c levels were greater than or equal to 7.5% and less than or equal to 10%. However, certain subjects who had baseline HbA1c levels outside that range were included as subjects.

460 subjects were randomized into three groups: ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day, ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day, and ITCA Placebo. Baseline demographics of the initial study phase subjects are presented in Table 1. Subjects' demographics (safety population) were matched across all treatment groups. This data is presented in Table 1. It is noteworthy that the time from diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes (˜9 years) was higher compared to subjects in the phase 2 study described elsewhere (i.e., in Henry et al 2014); thus, they had been exposed to anti-diabetes treatment drugs for longer periods time. Additionally, in the phase 3 study of this Example there were more subjects from minority groups, e.g., African American, the subjects had higher body weight, and the subjects were older. Overall, the subjects in the phase 3 study were less healthy and less likely to respond to a diabetes trial than subjects in the phase 2 study; that is to say, the subjects in the phase 3 trial described in this Example were harder to treat than those in the prior phase 2 study.

TABLE 1 ITCA 650 ITCA 650 Characteristic 20/40 μg/day 20/60 μg/day Placebo Total (unit) Statistic (N = 153) (N = 153) (N = 154) (N = 460) Age (years) Mean 55.5 (10.26)  54.7 (9.55)  54.7 (9.14)  55.0 (9.65)  (SD) <50 years n (%) 42 (27.5%) 46 (30.1%) 41 (26.6%) 129 (28.0%) 50-64 years n (%) 84 (54.9%) 79 (51.6%) 93 (60.4%) 256 (55.7%) 65-74 years n (%) 22 (14.4%) 28 (18.3%) 18 (11.7%)  68 (14.8%) ≥75 years n (%) 5 (3.3%) 0 2 (1.3%)  7 (1.5%) Gender Male n (%) 89 (58.2%) 91 (59.5%) 92 (59.7%) 272 (59.1%) Female n (%) 64 (41.8%) 62 (40.5%) 62 (40.3%) 188 (40.9%) Race White n (%) 129 (84.3%) 125 (81.7%)  126 (81.8%)  380 (82.6%) Black or African n (%)  20 (13.1%) 21 (13.7%) 23 (14.9%)  64 (13.9%) American Asian n (%)  1 (0.7%) 2 (1.3%) 2 (1.3%)  5 (1.1%) Asian Indian (Indian n (%)  2 (1.3%) 0 0  2 (0.4%) Subcontinent) American Indian or n (%) 0 4 (2.6%) 2 (1.3%)  6 (1.3%) Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or n (%) 1 (0.7%) 0 0  1 (0.2%) Other Pacific Islander Other n (%) 0 0 0 0 Multiple n (%) 0 1 (0.7%) 1 (0.6%)  2 (0.4%) Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino n (%) 56 (36.6%) 47 (30.7%) 59 (38.3%) 162 (35.2%) Not Hispanic or Latino n (%) 96 (62.7%) 105 (68.6%)  95 (61.7%) 296 (64.3%) Not Reported n (%) 1 (0.7%) 1 (0.7%) 0  2 (0.4%)

B. Pharmacodynamic Data

At week 39, subjects in the ITCA 20/40 μg/day group (n=147) had an average Hb1A1c % decrease of 1.12% and subjects in the ITCA 20/60 μg/day group (n=151) had an average Hb1A1c % decrease of 1.2%, whereas subjects in the placebo group (n=143) had an average Hb1A1c % decrease of 0.13%. The average decreases in the two treatments groups relative to placebo were statistically significant. See, FIG. 2. The observed decreases in Hb1A1c % was slightly less than that observed in the phase 2 study described elsewhere (i.e., in Henry et al 2014). However, as mentioned above, the subjects enrolled in the phase 3 study of this Example were less healthy and less likely to respond to a diabetes trial (“harder to treat”) than subjects in the phase 2 trial. Yet, reductions in HbA1c were clinically and statistically significant versus placebo at each scheduled time point for the mITT population over 39 weeks.

Over time, subjects who received ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day or 20/60 μg/day demonstrated impressive and sustained reductions in weight relative to placebo. There was a steady drop in body weight between baseline and week 39. Data for the mITT population are shown in Table 2 and illustrated in FIGS. 3 to 5. FIG. 5 shows data for only those subjects who completed the 39 weeks.

TABLE 2 Change from Baseline Body Weight by Visit Modified Intention-to-Treat (mITT) Population ITCA 650 ITCA 650 20/40 20/60 mcg/day mcg/day Placebo Visit Statistic (N = 147) (N = 151) (N = 143) Baseline Body Weight (kg) n 147 151 143 Mean (SD) 96.68 97.70 97.25 (18.503) (18.268) (21.626) Week 1 Body Weight (kg) n 147 149 142 Mean (SD) 96.05 96.78 97.23 (18.529) (18.248) (21.683) Change from Baseline to Week 1 Mean (SD) −0.63 (1.361) −0.73 (1.720) −0.19 (1.761) p-value (vs. 0.024 0.005 Placebo) Percent Change from Baseline to Week 1 Mean (SD) −0.67 (1.418) −0.76 (1.799) −0.21 (1.624) Week 6 Body Weight (kg) n 143 149 141 Mean (SD) 95.94 96.56 96.79 (18.851) (17.951) (21.826) Change from Baseline to Week 6 Mean (SD) −0.76 (2.077) −1.18 (2.548) −0.52 (1.813) p-value (vs. 0.345 0.010 Placebo) Percent Change from Baseline to Week 6 Mean (SD) −0.86 (2.180) −1.17 (2.495) −0.56 (1.884) Week 13 Body Weight (kg) n 138 145 127 Mean (SD) 95.66 96.30 96.68 (18.787) (18.249) (22.253) Change from Baseline to Week 13 Mean (SD) −0.92 (2.526) −1.45 (3.007) −0.78 (2.779) p-value (vs. 0.705 0.055 Placebo) Percent Change from Baseline to Week 13 Mean (SD) −1.05 (2.529) −1.48 (2.936) −0.83 (2.871) Week 19 Body Weight (kg) n 125 137 113 Mean (SD) 94.06 94.90 95.96 (18.017) (18.302) (22.631) Change from Baseline to Week 19 Mean (SD) −1.75 (3.408) −2.27 (3.572) −0.61 (3.611) p-value (vs. 0.014 <0.001 Placebo) Percent Change from Baseline to Week 19 Mean (SD) −1.88 (3.322) −2.39 (3.423) −0.73 (3.636) Week 26 Body Weight (kg) n 119 123 96 Mean (SD) 93.56 94.04 94.01 (18.687) (18.253) (22.183) Change from Baseline to Week 26 Mean (SD) −2.21 (3.626) −3.03 (4.176) −1.17 (3.777) p-value (vs. 0.060 <0.001 Placebo) Percent Change from Baseline to Week 26 Mean (SD) −2.41 (3.743) −3.12 (3.951) −1.27 (4.019) Week 32 Body Weight (kg) n 108 114 76 Mean (SD) 93.25 94.49 94.91 (19.087) (18.695) (22.832) Change from Baseline to Week 32 Mean (SD) −2.38 (4.150) −3.23 (4.582) −1.41 (4.591) p-value (vs. 0.150 0.007 Placebo) Percent Change from Baseline to Week 32 Mean (SD) −2.59 (4.389) −3.37 (4.290) −1.62 (4.946) Week 39 Body Weight (kg) n 98 110 68 Mean (SD) 91.67 93.75 94.34 (17.972) (18.163) (23.331) Change from Baseline to Week 39 Mean (SD) −2.97 (4.318) −3.99 (4.679) −2.17 (5.134) p-value (vs. 0.254 0.014 Placebo) Percent Change from Baseline to Week 39 Mean (SD) −3.17 (4.607) −4.14 (4.564) −2.38 (5.387)

Subjects in the both treatment groups experienced significant weight loss relative to subjects in the placebo group. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) endpoint data are shown in Table 3 and illustrated in FIG. 6.

TABLE 3 ITCA 650 ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day 20/60 μg/day Placebo Statistic (N = 147) (N = 151) (N = 143) Baseline Body Weight (kg) Mean (SD) 96.68 (18.503) 97.70 (18.268) 97.25 (21.626) LOCF Endpoint Body Mean (SD) 94.37 (18.966) 94.70 (18.672) 96.21 (22.469) Weight (kg) Change from Baseline at Mean (SD) −2.31 (4.058)  −3.00 (4.746)  −1.04 (4.421) LOCF Endpoint p-value (vs. 0.015 <0.001 Placebo)

At week 39, 37.4% of the subjects in the ITCA 20/40 μg/day group had their LOCF endpoint Hb1A1c % reduce to below 7% and 43.7% of the subjects in the ITCA 20/60 μg/day group had their LOCF endpoint Hb1A1c % reduce to below 7%, whereas only 9.1% of subjects in placebo group experienced this reduction. These data are shown in Table 4.

TABLE 4 ITCA 650 ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day 20/60 μg/day Placebo Statistic (N = 147) (N = 151) (N = 143) n (%) 55 (37.4%) 66 (43.7%) 13 (9.1%) Odds Ratio  6.446  8.146 97.5% CI of Odds Ratio (2.985, (3.799, 13.921) 17.469) p-value (vs. Placebo) <0.001 <0.001 Note: Odds ratio is the odds of the treatment group attaining the endpoint over the odds in the placebo group.

Data was analyzed for subjects who fit into one of the following two co-treatment groups: subjects who were co-treated with metformin monotherapy and subjects who were co-treated with metformin and sulfonylurea combination therapy. In FIGS. 7 and 8, HbA1c % data is shown for the mITT population from members of each group at LOCF endpoint. Subjects in the 20/40 μg/day group had an average Hb1A1c % decrease of 1.0% and 1.11% respectively for the two co-treated groups and subjects in the 20/60 μg/day group had an average Hb1A1c % decrease of 1.35% and 0.97% respectively for the two co-treated groups. All decreases were statistically significant relative to their respective baseline values.

Data was analyzed for subjects administered sulfonylurea (SU) over the study period or not administered SU. Hb1Ac % decreases at week 13, week 26, and week 39 for various treatment group is shown in Table 5.

TABLE 5 Population Baseline Week 6 Week 13 Week 19 Week 26 Week 32 Week 39 ITCA 650 20/60 mITT 8.4% −1.0% −1.2% −1.5% −1.5% −1.5% −1.4% p-value vs 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Placebo Without SU 8.4% −1.0% −1.3% −1.6% −1.6% −1.6% −1.7% (n = 78) With SU 8.4% −1.0% −1.1% −1.4% −1.5% −1.4% −1.2% (n = 73) ITCA 650 20/40 mITT 8.5% −1.0% −1.2% −1.5% −1.4% −1.4% −1.3% p-value vs 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Placebo Without SU 8.6% −1.0 −1.2% −1.5 −1.6% −1.6 −1.5% (n = 75) With SU 8.4% −1.0 −1.3% −1.4 −1.3% −1.2 −1.1% (n = 72) Placebo 8.5% −0.3% −0.4% −0.4% −0.3% −0.5% −0.4% Without SU With SU 8.6% −0.3% −0.4% −0.4% −0.5% −0.5% −0.5%

Reductions in HbA1c were clinically and statistically significant versus placebo at 39 weeks for subjects who were treated with ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day or ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day along with diet and exercise but no co-treatment with an oral antidiabetic medication. At week 39, subjects in the 20/40 μg/day group had average Hb1A1c % decrease of 1.1% and subjects in the 20/60 μg/day group had average Hb1A1c % decrease of 1.2%. See, FIG. 9.

Reductions in HbA1c for each treatment group were clinically and statistically significant versus placebo beginning at six weeks and thereafter at each scheduled time point for the mITT population over 39 weeks. See, FIG. 10. The week 26 time point is significant for benchmarking of similar competitive trials.

Subjects with baseline Hb1A1c % of ≤8.5% experienced a clinically meaningful decrease in HbA1c % by week 6 in both ITCA 650 treated groups: −0.84 and −0.79% respectively. The largest reduction in HbA1c was observed at weeks 26 and 39 for the ITCA 650 treated groups. Reductions in HbA1c were clinically significant at each scheduled time point for the mITT population over 39 weeks. See, FIG. 11.

The number of subjects in the mITT population with baseline Hb1A1c % of ≤8.5% at each time point is shown in Table 6.

TABLE 6 Treatment Week 6 Week 13 Week 26 Week 39 ITCA 20/40 mcg/day 79 81 67 56 ITCA 20/60 mcg/day 87 85 70 63 Placebo 73 69 55 45

Subjects with baseline Hb1A1c % of >8.5% (but ≤10%) also experienced a clinically meaningful decrease in HbA1c % by week 6 in both ITCA 650 treated groups: −1.20 and −1.30% respectively. The largest reduction in HbA1c in the placebo treated group was observed at week 26. See, FIG. 12. The overall placebo effect was less for subjects with baseline Hb1A1c % of ≤8.5% than for subjects with an HbA1%>8.5%.

The number of subjects in the mITT population with baseline Hb1A1c % of >8.5% (but ≤10%) at each time point is shown in Table 7.

TABLE 7 Treatment Week 6 Week 13 Week 26 Week 39 ITCA 20/40 mcg/day 61 58 54 41 ITCA 20/60 mcg/day 62 59 55 47 Placebo 66 56 48 23

A total of 60.8% in the placebo treated group were considered non-responders with an HbA1c reduction of <0.5% compared to 25.9% for subjects in the ITCA 20/40 μg/day group and 25.8% subjects in the ITCA 20/60 μg/day group. An HbA1c reduction of ≥1% was achieved by 55.8% of patients who completed 39 weeks (ITCA 20/40 μg/day group), 58.3% (20/60 μg/day group) and 21.0% in the placebo treated group. An HbA1c reduction of ≥2% was achieved by 23.1% of patients who completed 39 weeks of ITCA 650 20/40 mcg/day, 24.5% in the ITCA 650 20/60 mcg/day group and only 5.6% in the placebo treated group. Relevant data is displayed below in Table 8.

TABLE 8 ITCA 650 ITCA 650 20/40 20/60 mcg/day mcg/day Placebo Statistic (N = 147) (N = 151) (N = 143) Decrease from n 125 131 79 Baseline at LOCF Endpoint <0.5% n (%) 38 (25.9%) 39 (25.8%) 87 (60.8%) ≥1% n (%) 82 (55.8%) 88 (58.3%) 30 (21.0%) ≥2% n (%) 34 (23.1%) 37 (24.5%) 8 (5.6%) ≥3% n (%) 7 (4.8%) 8 (5.3%) 2 (1.4%) ≥4% n (%) 1 (0.7%) 2 (1.3%) 0 ≥5% n (%) 0 0 0 Note Patients with an increase or no change from Baseline at LOCF endpoint are counted in the “<0.5%” row. Patients are counted in all the “Decrease from Baseline” categories that apply.

For subjects who received ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day, subjects who were co-treated with sulfonylurea (SU) experienced smaller decreases in HbA1c % over time when compared to subjects who were not co-treated with sulfonylurea (SU). Decreases in HbA1c % for those treated with ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day was significantly greater than corresponding placebo subjects. See, FIG. 13. Similarly, for subjects who received ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day and were co-treated with sulfonylurea (SU) experienced smaller decreases in HbA1c % over time when compared to subjects who received ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day and were not co-treated with sulfonylurea (SU). Placebo subjects treated with SU or not treated with SU experienced equivalent decreases in HbA1c % until week 19; after week 32, placebo subjects taking SU had a greater decrease in HbA1c % than placebo subjects not taking SU. However, decreases in HbA1c % for those treated with ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day was significantly greater than corresponding placebo subjects. See, FIG. 14.

By the 39^(th) week, subjects who received ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day and were co-treated with SU experienced an average 1.21% decrease in HbA1c % whereas subjects who were not co-treated with SU experienced an average 1.68% decreases in HbA1c %. Similarly, subjects who received ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day and were co-treated with SU experienced an average 1.19% decrease in HbA1c % whereas subjects who were not co-treated with SU experienced an average 1.66% decreases in HbA1c %. The opposite phenomenon was observed for placebo subjects: those treated with SU experienced a 0.54% decrease in HbA1c % whereas subjects who were not treated with SU experienced an average 0.23% decreases in HbA1c %. See, FIG. 15.

For subjects who received ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day, subjects who had a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 8.5% (and less than or equal to 10.0%) experienced greater decreases in HbA1c % over time when compared to subjects who had a baseline HbA1c % of less than 8.5%. Similarly, for subjects who received ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day and had a baseline HbA1c % of greater than 8.5% (and less than or equal to 10.0%) experienced greater decreases in HbA1c % over time when compared to subjects who had a baseline HbA1c % of less than 8.5%. See, FIG. 16. These data were comparable to data obtained in the phase 2 trial (described in Henry et al 2014).

By the 48^(th) week endpoint of the phase 2 trial (described in Henry et al 2014), subjects receiving metformin and implanted with an ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day device had their Hb1A1c % decrease 1.39%. Similarly, by the 39^(th) week endpoint in the presently-described phase 3 trial, subjects receiving metformin and implanted with an ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day device had their Hb1A1c % decrease 1.40%.

C. Safety and Tolerability

Treatment was very-well tolerated. The subjects' disposition for the randomized population was matched across all three treatment groups. This data is presented in Table 9.

TABLE 9 ITCA 650 ITCA 650 Disposition Status 20/40 20/60 Primary Reason Statistic μg/day μg/day Placebo Total Number of Patients n 153 153 154 460 Randomized Number of Patients Treated n (%) 153 153 154 460 (Safety Population) (100.0%) (100.0%) (100.0%) (100.0%) Number of Patients Treated n (%) 147 151 143 (92.9%) 441 (95.9%) with a Post-Baseline HbA1c (96.1%) (98.7%) Result (mITT Population) Number of Patients Who n (%) 26 (17.0%) 18 (11.8%)  65 (42.2%) 109 (23.7%) Received Rescue Therapy Number of Patients Who n (%) 120 123 123 (79.9%) 366 (79.6%) Completed the Treatment (78.4%) (80.4%) Number of Patients Who n (%) 33 (21.6%) 30 (19.6%)  31 (20.1%)  94 (20.4%) Prematurely Discontinued Treatment Total Number of Patients Who n (%) 140 141 139 (90.3%) 420 (91.3%) Completed the 4-Week Follow-up (91.5%) (92.2%)

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) leading to permanent discontinuation of study medication safety population was as expected. Relevant data is presented in Table 10. Incidence of GI related TEAE that resulted in discontinuation in study medication were similar between the two ITCA 650 treatment groups.

TABLE 10 ITCA 650 ITCA 650 System Organ Class/ 20/40 μg/day 20/60 μg/day Placebo Preferred Term Statistic (N = 153) (N = 153) (N = 154) Any n (%) 18 (11.8%) 13 (8.5%) 6 (3.9%) Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Medication Gastrointestinal n (%) 11 (7.2%) 11 (7.2%) 2 (1.3%) disorders Vomiting n (%)  4 (2.6%)  5 (3.3%) 1 (0.6%) Nausea n (%)  3 (2.0%)  5 (3.3%) 1 (0.6%) Diarrhea n (%)  2 (1.3%) 0 0 Abdominal pain n (%) 0  1 (0.7%) 0 Abdominal n (%)  1 (0.7%) 0 0 pain upper Gastritis n (%)  1 (0.7%) 0 0 Metabolism and n (%) 0  1 (0.7%) 1 (0.6%) nutrition disorders Hyperglycemia n (%) 0  1 (0.7%) 1 (0.6%) Note A treatment-emergent adverse event is defined as an adverse event starting on or after the initial placement procedure and on or before the date of final removal. Patients with multiple occurrences of an event coded to the same System Organ Class/Preferred term are counted only once for that System Organ Class/Preferred term.

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Safety Population was as expected. Relevant data is presented in Table 11.

TABLE 11 ITCA 650 ITCA 650 System Organ Class/ 20/40 μg/day 20/60 μg/day Placebo Preferred Term Statistic (N = 153) (N = 153) (N = 154) Any n (%) 126 (82.4%) 130 (85.0%) 110 Treatment-Emergent (71.4%) Adverse Event Gastrointestinal n (%) 71 (46.4%) 74 (48.4%) 30 (19.5%) disorders Nausea n (%) 47 (30.7%) 48 (31.4%) 15 (9.7%) Vomiting n (%) 29 (19.0%) 37 (24.2%)  3 (1.9%) Diarrhea n (%) 22 (14.4%) 19 (12.4%) 15 (9.7%) Metabolism and n (%) 26 (17.0%) 34 (22.2%) 20 (13.0%) nutrition disorders Hypoglycemia n (%) 14 (9.2%) 10 (6.5%)  4 (2.6%) Decreased appetite n (%)  5 (3.3%) 16 (10.5%)  2 (1.3%) Hyperglycemia n (%)  4 (2.6%) 8 (5.2%) 11 (7.1%)

The incidence of nausea within the first week following placement of ITCA 650 20 μg/day was 15-18% compared to 3% in the placebo treated group. Following week 1, the incidence of nausea diminished to 4-6% in the ITCA 650 treatment groups. A transient increase to 15% was observed in the ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day treatment group at time of exchange of 20 μg/day device for an ITCA 60 μg/day device (at week 13) but returned to 4% at week 19. From week 19 through week 39, the incidence rate was low and about 3% or less and with ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day treatment group comparable to placebo. Similar patterns were observed for the ITCA 20/40 μg/day treatment group. See, FIG. 17. It is noteworthy that incidence of nausea diminishes quickly over time and soon after the device replacement at week 13, nausea incidence stabilizes to a level comparable to the incidence experienced by placebo subjects.

The incidence of nausea for the phase 3 trial was improved relative to the phase 2 trial. As mentioned above, for both doses in the phase 3 trial (ITCA 650 20/40 mcg/day and ITCA 650 20/60 mcg/day), there was a slight increase in nausea upon replacement of the 20 mcg/day device for the higher dose (40 mcg/day or 60 mcg/day) device; however, incidence of nausea diminished quickly over time. See, FIG. 18.

Overall, treatment with study medication was well tolerated in this completed phase 3 study (ITCA 650 CLP-103). No new safety findings were observed in this study compared to what was observed during the phase 2 trial and related studies (as described above). No pancreatic events or cases of thyroid cancer were observed. All Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were considered not related to study drug. GI related Adverse Events (AEs) were most common, diminished over time with treatment and were not dose-dependent. Events local to administration site were evenly distributed across the treatment groups. There were no major hypoglycemic events reported. The incidence of minor hypoglycemic events ranged between 2.7-9.2% across the treatment groups. Two patients had drug hypersensitivity (one patient in each dose group) and no patients had an allergic or anaphylactic reaction.

This Phase 3 trial showed efficacy and safety of ITCA 650 in treating type 2 diabetes for up to 39 weeks. Treatment with ITCA 650 20/40 μg/day or ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day for 39 weeks resulted in clinically and statistically significant reductions from baseline and vs. placebo in HbA1c and weight loss, the latter being dose-dependent. A significant proportion of subjects, for either dose, achieved an HbA1c of <7%. FIG. 19 lists certain endpoint data for the trial.

D. Comparison of Present Phase 3 Study and Prior Studies

The positive results obtained in the above-described phase 3 study are surprising in view of previously-described type 2 diabetes studies, e.g., the Duration 6 Trial. A comparison of the subject demographics for the above-described phase 3 study and Duration 6 Trial are shown in FIG. 20.

In the Duration 6 Trial, subjects received once-daily liraglutide (1.8 mg; VICTOZA® High Dose) injections or once-weekly exenatide (2 mg; Bydurenon) injections. In the Duration 6 Trial, liraglutide was “uptitrated” from 0.6 mg per day to 1.2 mg per day and then to 1.8 mg per day, with each titration being completed after at least 1 week. This uptitration is atypical since patients, according to the label for brand name liraglutide)(VICTOZA®, should have their dose increased more gradually. An endpoint was a change in HbA1c % from baseline to week 26. As shown in FIG. 21, decreases in HbA1c % over first 26 weeks of the Duration 6 Trial and the above-described phase 3 trial were similar. At 26 weeks, subjects treated with liraglutide had a nearly identical average HbA1c % decrease as subjects in the above-described phase 3 trial. A second endpoint was a decrease in bodyweight. Data for the above-described phase 3 trial is only shown for week 39. See, FIG. 22. Finally, emergent adverse events were comparable between the above-described phase 3 trial and the Duration 6 Trial. See, FIG. 23.

However, the ITCA 650 requires a single (or few) implantations per year whereas the treatment methods of the Duration 6 trial require daily or weekly injections of a drug. Such ease of use enhances patient comfort and thus, long-term, adherence which translates into superior real-world outcome in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Example 2 A Phase 3 Clinical Trial Data for Continuous Delivery of Exenatide for Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Having High Baseline HbA1c

A Phase 3 clinical trial was designed as an open-label, multi-center sub-study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of continuous delivery of a synthetic exenatide via a subcutaneously implanted osmotic delivery device in type 2 diabetes subjects with high baseline HbA1c (i.e., serum HbA1c levels >10.0% and ≤12.0%).

Initially, subjects are treated for 39-weeks. Subjects were subcutaneously implanted with a three month ITCA 650 osmotic delivery device delivering an exenatide dose of 20 μg/day, which was replaced after thirteen weeks with a six month ITCA 650 osmotic delivery device delivering an exenatide dose of 60 μg/day; the initial phase of the study includes 39 weeks of treatment. After 39 weeks of treatment, the ITCA 650 60 μg/day device was removed. This dosage scheme and members of this group are hereinafter in this Example referred to as ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day. All subjects return 4 weeks after their end of treatment (ET) visit for a post-treatment follow-up assessment regardless of the reason for treatment discontinuation. The Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population includes all patients from the safety population who had a valid baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c value. The Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) endpoint is defined as the last non-missing, on-treatment observation that is measured after baseline. Subjects who received rescue therapy were included in the mITT population. The 39 week study is represented graphically in FIG. 24.

Subjects were provided an opportunity to participate in extension phase 1 in which continued efficacy with the ITCA 650 60 μg/day dose regimen was studied for an additional 26 weeks of treatment. Subjects who agreed to continue in extension phase 1 had their ITCA 650 60 μg/day device removed at week 39 and replaced with another ITCA 650 60 μg/day device. Subjects in extension phase 1 had a 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit occurring four weeks after the end of treatment period, i.e., after week 65 or after premature treatment discontinuation. Subjects in the extension phase 1 (until week 65) and their related data are disclosed below in this Example. The 65 week study is represented graphically in FIG. 34.

Subjects completing the first extension phase were provided an opportunity to further be included in a second extension phase in which continued efficacy with the ITCA 650 60 μg/day dose regimen is studied for a further 26 weeks of treatment. Here, subjects who agreed to continue in the second extension phase had their ITCA 650 60 μg/day device removed at week 65 and replaced with another ITCA 650 60 μg/day device. Subjects in the second extension phase will have a 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit occurring four weeks after the end of treatment period, i.e., after week 91 or after premature treatment discontinuation. Subjects who participated in the second extension phase did not have a follow-up visit four weeks after the end of the initial 39 week treatment period.

Subjects are maintained on their pre-study oral antidiabetic medication regimen throughout the entire treatment period for all phases of the study. The 20/60 μg/day dose was selected based on the overall reduction in HbA1c in previous studies, the percent of patients reaching goal, and the robust reduction seen across the spectrum of HbA1c (see, e.g., Example 1). In addition, the tolerability profile was excellent for 60 μg/day and is only modestly less effective than the 80 μg/day dose.

The present study/studies allow evaluation of the safety and efficacy of treatment using continuous delivery of exenatide in type 2 diabetes mellitus over a 39 to 91 week treatment period for subjects having high baseline (HBL) HbA1c % (i.e., greater than 10%).

A. Demographics of Study Group

Inclusion criteria were as follows. Subjects were 18-80 years of age and diagnosed as having type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least three months prior to screening. Subjects had been on a stable treatment regimen of diet and exercise alone or in combination with a stable and optimal or near-optimal dose of metformin, sulfonylurea, TZD, or combination of these drugs for at least three months. Subjects had a stable body weight (not varying by >10% for at least three months. They had calcitonin levels of <50 ng/L (50 μg/mL) and a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m² and kg/m² at time of screening. Women of childbearing potential must have had a negative pregnancy test at Screening. HbA1c levels were greater than 10% and less than or equal to 12%. However, certain subjects who had baseline HbA1c levels outside that range were included as subjects.

Baseline demographics of the initial study phase subjects are presented in Table 12. Sixty (60) patients were randomized of which 59 (98.3%) were (i.e., the mITT population) and 52 patients completed 39-weeks of treatment.

TABLE 12 Total number of patients 60 Years since type 2 diabetes diagnosis 8.9 years Men 33 (57%) Women 25 (43%) Age (mean) 52.1 years HbA1c baseline % (mean) 10.7% Weight (mean) 93.4 kg Body mass index 32.1 kg/m² Background therapy Diet and exercise 31% Diet and exercise plus oral T2D medications 69%

The demographics of the safety population are shown in Table 13.

TABLE 13 ITCA 650 Characteristic 20/60 mcg/day (unit) Statistic (N = 60) Age (years) Mean (SD) 51.9 (10.18) <65 years n (%) 51 (85.0%) ≥65 years n (%) 9 (15.0%) Male n (%) 34 (56.7%) Female n (%) 26 (43.3%) Race White n (%) 48 (80.0%) Black or African American n (%)  8 (13.3%) Asian n (%) 1 (1.7%) Asian Indian (Indian n (%) 0 Subcontinent) American Indian or Alaska n (%) 0 Native Native Hawaiian or Other n (%) 1 (1.7%) Pacific Islander Other n (%) 1 (1.7%) Multiple n (%) 1 (1.7%) Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino n (%) 23 (38.3%) Not Hispanic or Latino n (%) 36 (60.0%) Not Reported n (%) 1 (1.7%)

Baseline Characteristics for the Safety Population are shown in Table 14.

TABLE 14 ITCA 650 20/60 mcg/day Characteristic (unit) Statistic (N = 60) Weight (kg) Mean (SD) 92.88 (18.836) Height (cm) Mean (SD) 169.8 (10.40) BMI (kg/m²) Mean (SD) 32.04 (4.898) BMI Category (kg/m²) <30 n (%) 22 (36.7%) >=30 n (%) 38 (63.3%) Missing n (%) 0 HbA1C (%) Mean (SD) 10.81 (0.654) Fasting Plasma Glucose Mean (SD) 13.70 (3.010) (mmol/L)

Baseline characteristics for the safety population of the first extension phase are presented in Table 15. Thirty-eight patients elected to continue treatment for an additional 26 weeks, up to week 65.

TABLE 15 ITCA 650 60 mcg/day (n = 38) mean; # in parentheses is Standard Characteristic (unit) Deviation Weight (kg) 93.38 (18.328) Height (cm) 169.4 (9.76) BMI (kg/m²) 32.40 (5.028) BMI Category (kg/m²) <30 12 (31.6%) >=30 26 (68.4%) HbA1C (%) 10.76 (0.565) Fasting Plasma Glucose (mmol/L) 13.61 (3.036)

The demographics of the safety population are shown in Table 16.

TABLE 16 ITCA 650 60 mcg/day (n = 38) Characteristic (unit) (n; % refers to percent of n) Age (years) Mean age 51.1 (SD: 10.30) <65 years 33 (86.8%) >=65 years  5 (13.2%) Gender Male 20 (52.6%) Female 18 (47.4%) Race White 28 (73.7%) Black or African American  7 (18.4%) Asian 0 Asian Indian (Indian Subcontinent) 0 American Indian or Alaska Native 0 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific 1 (2.6%) Islander Other 1 (2.6%) Multiple 1 (2.6%) Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino 13 (34.2%) Not Hispanic or Latino 24 (63.2%) Not Reported 1 (2.6%)

B. Pharmacodynamic Data

(i) Interim Data, Data Up to Week 26,

The following pharmacodynamic measurement data were obtained from the initial phase study subjects.

HbA1c levels were measured at 13, 19, and 26 weeks, the results of which are shown in Table 17. At the week 13 time point, subjects had received the exenatide at 20 μg/day for 13 weeks via a three month osmotic delivery device. At the week 19 time point, subjects had received the exenatide at 20 μg/day for 13 weeks and had received the exenatide at 60 μg/day for 6 weeks via a six month osmotic delivery device. At the week 26 time point, subjects had received the exenatide at 20 μg/day for 13 weeks and had received the exenatide at 60 μg/day for 13 weeks. Subjects were enrolled in the study on a rolling basis, so the reduced sample size for later time points does not reflect subject drop out.

TABLE 17 Time Change Point Sample HbA1c % (mean) from (Week) Size Baseline at Time Point Baseline 13 n = 50 10.8 8.3 −2.5 19 n = 39 10.7 7.8 −2.9 26 n = 25 10.9 7.7 −3.2

Patients surprisingly showed excellent HbA1c % decrease at low dose (20 μg/day) after at least a 13 week administration period. 22% of patients had an HbA1c % decrease of at least 4.0. See, Table 18. Of the subjects showing an HbA1c % decrease of at least 4.0 at 13 weeks, seven of those subjects showed a decrease greater than 4.5; four of those subjects showed a decrease greater than 5.0; three of those subjects showed a decrease greater than 5.5; and one subject showed a decrease greater than 6.0. See, Table 18.

TABLE 18 Proportion of subjects who received at least 13 weeks of therapy and had already achieved a 2% or greater reduction in HbA1c HbA1c % Reduction # Patients % Patients ≥2.0 39 of 50 78% ≥3.0 25 of 50 50% ≥4.0 11 of 50 22% ≥5.0  4 of 50  8% ≥6.0  1 of 50  2%

These decreases represent surprising and unprecedented reductions in the total amount of serum HbA1c of at least 35.1%, and as much as 51.7%. After at least 13 weeks of low dose of the exenatide treatment of 20 mcg/day, eleven patients had an HbA1c % decrease of at least 4.0%.

Data for eleven subjects who had an HbA1c % decrease of at least 4.0 at week 13 of the initial study is shown in Table 19. Ten of the eleven subjects decreased their HbA1c level to below the target of 7.0% and nine of the eleven decreased their HbA1c level to 6.5% or below.

TABLE 19 HbA1c % # HbA1c % HbA1c % decrease Overall HbA1c Patients Baseline at Treatment Point from Baseline reduction 1 12.0 5.8 −6.2 51.7% 2 10.9 5.3 −5.6 51.4% 3 11.8 5.9 −5.9 50.0% 4 11.4 6.4 −5.0 43.9% 5 11.1 6.4 −4.7 42.3% 6 11.2 6.5 −4.7 42.0% 7 11.0 6.4 −4.6 41.8% 8 10.4 6.3 −4.1 39.4% 9 10.4 6.3 −4.1 39.4% 10  11.3 6.9 −4.4 38.9% 11  11.4 7.4 −4.0 35.1%

At 26 weeks, subjects lost an average of 1.1 kg of body weight. This is less weight loss than is experienced at 24 weeks for non-high baseline subjects (≤10% HbA1c) treated with ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day (i.e., 3.1 kg). It is known that high baseline subjects suffer from Glycosuria (excretion of sugar/calories in urine); this loss of calories in urine helps the high baseline subject keep his/her weight down. However, once the Glycosuria is lessened, the subject ceases losing excess calories in urine. Indeed, it has been reported that high baseline subjects treated with vildagliptin/metformin or liraglutide/metformin resulted in weight increases of 1.29 kg and 1.3 kg, respectively, due to lessening of Glycosuria. Since treating Glycosuria in high baseline subjects is known to cause weight gain in these subjects, the observed lessened weight loss data for high baseline relative to non-high baseline subjects was not unexpected. However, it is noteworthy that the high baseline subjects in this phase 3 study actually lost weight, i.e., −1.1 kg, whereas high baseline subjects in the benchmarking vildagliptin/metformin or liraglutide/metformin studies gained weight (i.e., +1.29 kg and +1.3 kg, respectively). Accordingly, high baseline subjects in this phase 3 trial lost about 2.4 kg of weight relative to high baseline subjects in the vildagliptin/metformin or liraglutide/metformin studies; this relative weight loss was unexpected.

(ii) Data from the Original and Completed 39 Week Study Phase

The following pharmacodynamic measurement data were analyzed at the completion of the 39^(th) week of the phase 3 trial.

As mentioned above, this phase 3 study included a 13 week initial phase in which all treatment subjects (i.e., those not in the placebo group) received an ITCA 650 20 μg/day device. At the end of the initial phase the ITCA 650 20 μg/day device was replaced with an ITCA 650 60 μg/day device. Thus, at the week 39 time point, subjects had received the exenatide at 20 μg/day for 13 weeks and had received the exenatide at 60 μg/day for 26 weeks.

Over time, subjects with high baseline HbA1c % who received ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day demonstrated impressive and sustained reductions in their HbA1c %. There was a steady drop in HbA1c % between baseline and weeks 19; with the most rapid drop being in the first 6 weeks of the study. Subjects' HbA1c % levels remained relatively constant for the rest of the study period. See, FIG. 25.

Tables 20, 21, and 22 show data obtained from subjects with high baseline HbA1c % who received ITCA 650 20/60 μg/day.

TABLE 20 Change from Baseline HbA1c (%) by Visit Modified Intention-to-Treat Population ITCA 650 Visit Statistic 20/60 mcg/day n 59 Baseline HbA1c (%) Mean (SD)  10.78 (0.593) n 59 Week 6 HbA1c (%) Mean (SD)  8.96 (0.907) Change from Baseline to Mean (SD) −1.82 (0.802) Week 6 n 56 Week 13 HbA1c (%) Mean (SD)  8.22 (1.187) Change from Baseline to Mean (SD) −2.53 (1.276) Week 13 n 51 Week 19 HbA1c (%) Mean (SD)  7.65 (1.128) Change from Baseline to Mean (SD) −3.07 (1.284) Week 19 n 45 Week 26 HbA1c (%) Mean (SD)  7.61 (1.265) Change from Baseline to Mean (SD) −3.16 (1.321) Week 26 n 37 Week 32 HbA1c (%) Mean (SD)  7.42 (1.274) Change from Baseline to Mean (SD) −3.35 (1.310) Week 32 n 33 Week 39 HbA1c (%) Mean (SD)  7.32 (1.139) Change from Baseline to Mean (SD) −3.40 (1.325) Week 39

TABLE 21 Change from Baseline HbA1c (%) at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) endpoint for Modified Intention-to-Treat Population ITCA 650 20/60 mcg/day Statistic (N = 59) Baseline HbA1c (%) Mean (SD) 10.78 (0.591)  LOCF Endpoint HbA1c (%) Mean (SD) 8.00 (1.377) Change from Baseline at Mean (SD) −2.78 (1.416)  LOCF Endpoint p-value <0.001

TABLE 22 Proportion of Patients with Decrease in HbA1c <0.5%, ≥1%, ≥2%, ≥3%, ≥4%, and ≥5% at LOCF Endpoint Modified Intention-to-Treat Population ITCA 650 20/60 mcg/day Decrease from Baseline at Statistic (N = 59) LOCF Endpoint n 57 <0.5%   n (%) 2 (3.4%) ≥1% n (%) 53 (89.8%) ≥2% n (%) 43 (72.9%) ≥3% n (%) 27 (45.8%) ≥4% n (%) 13 (22.0%) ≥5% n (%) 3 (5.1%) Note: Patients with an increase or no change from Baseline at LOCF endpoint are counted in the “<0.5%” row. Patients are counted in all the “Decrease from Baseline” categories that apply.

Overall, fifteen subjects (24.4%) achieved a LOCF endpoint HbA1c of less than 7%.

Subjects receiving ITCA 60 mcg/day experienced significant weight loss relative to subjects in the placebo group. The LOCF endpoint data are shown in Table 23 and illustrated in FIG. 26.

TABLE 23 Change from Baseline Body Weight at LOCF Endpoint for the Modified Intention-to-Treat Population ITCA 650 60 mcg/day Statistic (N = 59) Baseline Body Weight Mean (SD) 93.05 (18.948) (kg) LOCF Endpoint Body Weight Mean (SD) 91.82 (18.818) (kg) Change from Baseline at Mean (SD) −1.23 (5.746)  LOCF Endpoint p-value <0.05

Reduction in body weight was observed from week 6 and continued during the course of the study (39 weeks). The weight loss had not plateaued (reached steady state) at week 39. In comparison, patients treated with other GLP-1 RA's may experience a plateau or rebound of body following 24 or 26 weeks of dosing.

Overall, the 39 week treatment with 20/60 mcg/day of ITCA 650 proved effective. At week 39, HbA1c was reduced by −2.78%. This reduction in HbA1c is clinically and statistically significant. Weight loss of −1.23 kg was observed. 25.4% of patients achieved an HbA1c of <7%. Reduction of HbA1c of ≥1% was achieved by 89.8% of patients who completed 39 weeks of ITCA 650 60 mcg/day. HbA1c reduction of ≥2% was achieved by 72.9% of patients and 45.8% of patients achieved a HbA1c reduction of ≥3% and 22.% had a HbA1c reduction of ≥3% at week 39.

(iii) Data for Up to Week 65, First Extension Phase

The following pharmacodynamic measurement data were analyzed at the completion of extension phase 1 of the phase 3 trial for subjects with high baseline HbA1c.

As mentioned above, the phase 3 study included a 13 week initial phase in which all treatment subjects (i.e., those not in the placebo group) received an ITCA 650 20 μg/day device. At the end of the initial phase, the ITCA 650 20 μg/day device was replaced with an ITCA 650 60 μg/day device. At the first extension phase, subjects who agreed to continue in the first extension phase had their ITCA 650 60 μg/day device removed at week 39 and replaced with another ITCA 650 60 μg/day device and treated for an additional 26 weeks (to week 65). Subjects in the first extension phase had a 4-week post-treatment follow-up visit occurring four weeks after the end of treatment period, i.e., after week 65 or after premature treatment discontinuation, unless they opted to continue directly into the second extension phase (to week 91) with a new 6 month 60 mcg/day ITCA 650 osmotic delivery device.

Thus, at the week 65 time point, subjects who completed the entire treatment period had received the exenatide at 20 μg/day for 13 weeks and had received the exenatide at 60 μg/day for 52 weeks.

Over the first extension phase, subjects demonstrated sustained reductions in their HbA1c %. Clinically and statistically significant reduction in HbA1c of −3.08% relative to baseline was observed at week 65; this was a greater reduction than was observed at 39 weeks for the LOCF endpoint for the mITT populations (i.e., −2.78%). See, FIG. 35.

As shown in FIG. 25, there was a steady and significant reduction in HbA1c % between baseline and every study visit until weeks 19, with the most rapid drop being in the first 6 weeks of the study. Subjects' HbA1c % levels further declined for the rest of the study period including the first extension phase. See, FIG. 36.

Table 24 shows data obtained from subjects with high baseline HbA1c % who received ITCA 650 60 mcg/day into the first extension phase.

TABLE 24 Proportion of patients with a decrease in HbA1c of ≥1%, ≥2%, ≥3%, ≥4%, or ≥5% at LOCF endpoint for mITT population for subjects participating in the first extension phase ITCA 650 60 mcg/day N = 38 Decrease from Baseline at n; % refers to percent of n LOCF Endpoint 37 ≥1% 36 (97.3%) ≥2% 30 (81.1%) ≥3% 22 (59.5%) ≥4% 11 (29.7%) ≥5% 2 (5.4%) Note: Patients are counted in all the “Decrease from Baseline” categories that apply.

Twelve subjects (31.6%) achieved a LOCF endpoint HbA1c of less than 7%.

A comparison of efficacy of the initial 39 week phase and the first extension phase is shown in Table 25.

TABLE 25 Efficacy Summary Week 39 Week 65 mITT Population (n) 59 38 % Change in HbA1c (LOCF Endpoint) −2.78 −3.08 p-value <0.001 <0.001 % Treated To Goal (Week 39) of HbA lc <7% 25.4 31.9 % of percent with HbA1c reduction of 1% or more 89.8 97.3 % of percent with HbA1c reduction of 2% or more 72.9 81.1 % of percent with HbA1c reduction of 3% or more 45.8 59.5

Overall, the first extension phase of the trial demonstrated that an additional 26 weeks treatment with ITCA 650 60 mcg/day was effective. HbA1c was reduced at week 65 by −3.08%. This reduction in HbA1c is clinically and statistically significant. 31.9% of patients achieved an HbA1c of <7%. HbA1c reduction of ≥1% was achieved by 97.3% of patients, HbA1c reduction of ≥2% was achieved by 81.1% of patients, HbA1c reduction of ≥3% was achieved by 59.5% of patients, HbA1c reduction of ≥4% was achieved by 11% of subjects, and HbA1c reduction of ≥5% was achieved by 5.4% of patients. The durability of treatment effect was confirmed following more than one year of treatment in these originally poorly controlled diabetic patients.

C. Safety and Tolerability

(i) Data Up to Week 39

Treatment was well tolerated. There was low incidence and severity of gastrointestinal side effects: 28% of subjects experienced mid- to moderate nausea, 18% experienced vomiting and 18% experienced diarrhea. Three minor cases of hypoglycemia were reported. No cases of major hypoglycemia were reported.

In the Safety Population, the incidence of nausea within the first week following placement of ITCA 650 60 μg/day was 16%. Following week 1, the incidence of nausea progressively diminished to about 3-7% by week 13. A transient increase to 16% was observed at week 13 when the 20 mcg/day device was replaced with ITCA 650 60 mcg/day but returned to about 4% at week 19. From week 19 through week 39, the incidence rate was low, about 1% or less with ITCA 650 20/60 mcg/day treatment group comparable to placebo. See, FIG. 27.

The incidence of Treatment-Emergent Events (TEAE) in the Safety Population is shown in Table 26.

TABLE 26 System Organ Class/ ITCA 650 Preferred Term Statistic 20/60 mcg/day (N = 60) Any Treatment-Emergent n (%) 52 (86.7%) Adverse Event Gastrointestinal disorders n (%) 35 (58.3%) Nausea n (%) 21 (35.0%) Vomiting n (%) 16 (26.7%) Diarrhea n (%) 14 (23.3%) Constipation n (%) 4 (6.7%) Dyspepsia n (%) 4 (6.7%) Abdominal distension n (%) 3 (5.0%) Flatulence n (%) 3 (5.0%) Gastro esophageal reflux disease n (%) 3 (5.0%) Metabolism and nutrition disorders n (%) 12 (20.0%) Hypoglycemia n (%) 4 (6.7%)

Only six patients discontinued treatment, of which only three were due to adverse events attributable to treatment; see Table 27. One subject was lost to follow-up.

TABLE 27 ITCA 650 System Organ Class/ 60 mcg/day Preferred Term Statistic (N = 60) Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event n (%)  6 (10.0%) Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Medication Gastrointestinal disorders n (%) 4 (6.7%) Vomiting n (%) 3 (5.0%) Diarrhea n (%) 1 (1.7%) Nausea n (%) 1 (1.7%) Metabolism and nutrition disorders n (%) 1 (1.7%) Hyperglycemia n (%) 1 (1.7%) Note: A treatment-emergent adverse event is defined as an adverse event starting on or after the initial placement procedure and on or before the date of final removal for the Sub-Study Phase. Patients with multiple occurrences of an event coded to the same System Organ Class/Preferred Term were counted only once for that System Organ Class/Preferred Term.

Twenty patients (33.3%) received rescue therapy. The criteria for rescue therapy are as follows: (1) Between day 0 and week 13, two or more fasting self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values >240 mg/dL during any 7-day period and confirmed by a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) determination at the site. When a patient reported two or more fasting SMBG values >240 mg/dL during any 7-day period after day 0 every effort was to be made to have the patient return to the clinic for an FPG measurement as soon as possible but within 7 days. (2) Following week 13, two or more fasting SMBG values >200 mg/dL during any 7-day period and confirmed by an FPG determination at the site. (3) Two consecutive FPG values >240 mg/dL (day 0 through week 13) or >200 mg/dL (after week 13) at the site. When two or more FPG values >240 mg/dL (day 0 through week 13) or >200 mg/dL (after week 13) were reported for a patient the patient was to be contacted and requested to return to the clinic for a second FPG measurement as soon as possible but within 7 days. (4) Increase in HbA1c: HbA1c elevations of +1.5% from day 0 or HbA1c>8.5% at week 26 and onwards. One re-test was permitted.

For the initial 39 week phase, the ITCA 650 60 mcg/day dose was well tolerated and the incidences of Treat-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) were low. The most common system organ classes affected were Gastrointestinal, General Disorder and Administration Site Conditions, Infections and Infestation and Musculoskeletal. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. GI related AEs were most common (23.3-35%) and diminished over time with treatment. Events local to administration site were similar to observations from the trial described above in Example 1. No new safety signals were observed in this study compared to what was observed during Phase 2 and for this class. There were a total of six Serious Adverse Events (10.0%) were reported. The Serious Adverse Events all coded as causality not related. ITCA 650 20/60 mcg/day was overall well tolerated with a discontinuation rate of 13.3%.

(ii) Data Up to Week 65, Extension Phase 1

Treatment with 60 mcg/day for an additional 26 weeks, up to week 65, was very well tolerated. Thirty eight subjects elected to continue treatment into the first extension phase. Thirty five subjects (92.1%) completed the first extension phase and three (7.9%) subjects prematurely discontinued treatment. One subject (2.6%) received rescue therapy during the first extension phase. Thirty two subjects agreed to continue into a second extension phase.

The incidence during the first extension phase of Newly Emergent Adverse Events for the safety population is shown in Table 28.

TABLE 28 ITCA 650 60 mcg/day AESI Category Statistic (n = 38) Any Adverse Events of n (%) 10 (26.3%) Special Interest Occurring During the First Events 16 Extension Phase Hypoglycemia n (%) 1 (2.6%) Events (%) 1 (6.3%) Nausea n (%)  6 (15.8%) Events (%)  6 (37.5%) Vomiting n (%) 3 (7.9%) Events (%)  3 (18.8%) Diarrhea n (%) 1 (2.6%) Events (%)  2 (12.5%) Note: n (%) = number of patients in the specified category and the percentage is based on the total number of patient in the analysis population; Events (%) = number of events in the specified category and the percentage is based on the total number of events.

The incidence during the first extension phase of Treatment-Emergent Events (TEAE) in the safety population is shown in Table 29.

TABLE 29 ITCA 650 60 mcg/day N = 38 System Organ Class/Preferred Term (% refers to percent of n) Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse 24 (63.2%) Event Occurring During the Sub-study 1st Extension Phase Gastrointestinal disorders  9 (23.7%) Nausea  6 (15.8%) Vomiting 3 (7.9%) Diarrhea 1 (2.6%) Note: A treatment-emergent adverse event is defined as an adverse event starting on or after the initial placement procedure and on or before the date of final removal for the Sub-study 1st Extension Phase.

The incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, during the first extension phase, leading to permanent discontinuation of study medication for safety population subjects is shown in Table 30.

TABLE 30 ITCA 650 60 mcg/day N = 38 System Organ Class/Preferred Term (% refers to percent of n) Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event 1 (2.6%) Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Medication Occurring During the Sub-study 1st Extension Phase Gastrointestinal disorders 1 (2.6%) Dyspepsia 1 (2.6%) Nausea 1 (2.6%) Note: A treatment-emergent adverse event is defined as an adverse event starting on or after the initial placement procedure and on or before the date of final removal for the Sub-study 1st Extension Phase. Patients with multiple occurrences of an event coded to the same system organ class/preferred term are counted only once for that system organ class/preferred term.

Treatment with 60 mcg/day for an additional 26 weeks was very well tolerated. No new safety signals were observed in first extension phase when compared to what was observed during initial 39 weeks of the phase three study of Example 2. No Adverse Events of Special Interest, i.e., no pancreatic events, thyroid nodules or neoplasms, CV/MACE events or major hypoglycemic events, were reported. There were no Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) reported during the first extension phase. Incidence of new treatment-emergent adverse events (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea) was very low with an incidence of 10.5% within the first week of placement, followed by an incidence of 0-4.5% throughout the study. Only one patient discontinued due to GI side effects. There were no major hypoglycemic events reported and the incidence of minor hypoglycemia was 6.3%.

Overall, no new safety signals emerged. The ITCA 650 was well tolerated and incidences of treatment emergent Adverse Events and Adverse Events of Special Interest were very low.

Other Embodiments

From the foregoing description, it will be apparent that variations and modifications may be made to the invention described herein to adopt it to various usages and conditions. Such embodiments are also within the scope of the following claims.

All citations to sequences, patents and publications in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each independent patent and publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of treating type 2 diabetes mellitus in a subject having a baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) % of greater than 10.0% comprising providing the subject a continuous delivery of an insulinotrophic peptide from an osmotic delivery device.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein a substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide at a therapeutic concentration is achieved within a time period of about 7 days after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the time period is selected from the group consisting of about 6 days, about 5 days, about 4 days, about 3 days, about 2 days, and about 1 day.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period of at least about 1 month.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period of at least about 2 months.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period of at least about 3 months.
 7. The method of claim 4, wherein the substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period selected from the group consisting of at least about 1 month to about two years, at least about 2 months to about two years, at least about 3 months to about two years, at least about 4 months to about two years, at least about 5 months to about two years, at least about 6 months to about two years, at least about 8 months to about two years, and at least about 9 months to about two years, about 1 year, at least one year to about two years, at least about 14 months to about two years, at least about 16 months to about two years, at least 18 months to about two years, at least about 20 months to about two years, at least about 22 months to about two years, and about two years.
 8. The method of claim 4, wherein the substantial steady-state delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from the osmotic delivery device is continuous over an administration period selected from the group consisting of at least about 1 month to about a year, at least about 2 months to about a year, about 3 months, at least about 3 months to about a year, at least about 4 months to about a year, at least about 5 months to about a year, about 6 months, at least about 6 months to about a year, at least about 8 months to about a year, about 9 months, at least about 9 months to about a year, at least about 10 months to about a year, at least about 11 month to about a year, and about a year.
 9. The method of claim 4, wherein the method produces a significant decrease in the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, relative to the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration before implantation of the osmotic delivery device.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the significant decrease in the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration is within a number of days selected from the group consisting of about 7 days, about 6 days, about 5 days, about 4 days, about 3 days, about 2 days, and about 1 day.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the significant decrease in the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration is achieved, relative to the subject's fasting plasma glucose concentration before implantation of the osmotic device, within about 1 day of implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject.
 12. The method of claim 9, wherein the significant decrease in fasting plasma glucose is maintained over the administration period.
 13. The method of claim 4, wherein the method produces a significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % after implantation of the osmotic delivery device in the subject, relative to the subject's baseline HbA1c %.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % is achieved within about six weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device.
 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % is achieved within about five weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about four weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about three weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, within about two weeks after implantation of the osmotic delivery device, or within about one week after implantation of the osmotic delivery device
 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the significant decrease in the subject's HbA1c % is maintained over the administration period.
 17. The method of claim 1, wherein termination of the continuous delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide produces a concentration of the insulinotrophic peptide that is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject within about 6 half-lives of the insulinotrophic peptide after termination of continuous delivery, within about 5 half-lives of the insulinotrophic peptide after termination of continuous delivery, within about 4 half-lives of the insulinotrophic peptide after termination of continuous delivery, or within about 3 half-lives of the insulinotrophic peptide after termination of continuous delivery.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject terminates continuous delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide.
 19. The method of claim 17, wherein the insulinotrophic peptide is detected by a radioimmunoassay (RIA), a chromatographic method, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), or an immunoenzymatic sandwich assay (IEMA).
 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the osmotic delivery device comprises an impermeable reservoir comprising interior and exterior surfaces and first and second open ends, a semi-permeable membrane in sealing relationship with the first open end of the reservoir, an osmotic engine within the reservoir and adjacent the semi-permeable membrane, a piston adjacent the osmotic engine, wherein the piston forms a movable seal with the interior surface of the reservoir, the piston divides the reservoir into a first chamber and a second chamber, the first chamber comprising the osmotic engine, a suspension formulation, wherein the second chamber comprises the suspension formulation and the suspension formulation is flowable and comprises the insulinotrophic peptide, and a diffusion moderator inserted in the second open end of the reservoir, the diffusion moderator adjacent the suspension formulation.
 21. The method of 20, wherein the reservoir comprises titanium or a titanium alloy.
 22. The method of claim 20, wherein the suspension formulation comprises a particle formulation comprising the insulinotrophic peptide and a vehicle formulation.
 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the insulinotrophic peptide comprises an exenatide peptide, a peptide analog thereof, or a peptide derivative thereof.
 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the particle formulation comprises particles comprising the exenatide peptide, the peptide analog thereof, or the peptide derivative thereof in particles of from about 2 microns to about 50 microns in diameter.
 25. The method of claim 23, wherein the insulinotrophic peptide is the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:
 1. 26. The method of claim 1 or 25, wherein the continuous delivery provides to the subject a mcg/day dose of an exenatide selected from the group consisting of about 10 mcg/day, about 20 mcg/day, about 30 mcg/day, about 40 mcg/day, about 50 mcg/day, about 60 mcg/day, about 70 mcg/day, or about 80 mcg/day.
 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the mcg/day dose of the exenatide is about 20 mcg/day.
 28. The method of claim 26, wherein the mcg/day dose of the exenatide is about 40 mcg/day.
 29. The method of claim 26, wherein the mcg/day dose of the exenatide is about 60 mcg/day.
 30. The method of claim 1 or 25, wherein termination of the continuous delivery results in a concentration of the exenatide that is substantially undetectable in a blood sample from the subject after termination of continuous delivery within a number of hours selected from the group consisting of about 72 hours, about 48 hours, about 24, about 12 hours, about 6 hours, and about 4 hours.
 31. The method of claim 30, wherein removal of the osmotic delivery device from the subject terminates continuous delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide.
 32. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises a first continuous administration period of the insulinotrophic peptide at a first mcg/day dose that is followed by a second continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the insulinotrophic peptide to a second mcg/day dose, wherein the second mcg/day dose is greater than the first mcg/day dose.
 33. The method of claim 32, wherein the first mcg/day dose is delivered by a first osmotic delivery device and the second mcg/day dose is delivered by a second osmotic delivery device, and delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from at least the first or the second osmotic delivery device is continuous over the administration period of at least about 1 month.
 34. The method of claim 32, wherein the first mcg/day dose is delivered by a first osmotic delivery device and the second mcg/day dose is delivered by a second osmotic delivery device, and delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from at least the first or the second osmotic delivery device is continuous over the administration period of at least about 2 months.
 35. The method of claim 32, wherein the first mcg/day dose is delivered by a first osmotic delivery device and the second mcg/day dose is delivered by a second osmotic delivery device, and delivery of the insulinotrophic peptide from at least the first or the second osmotic delivery device is continuous over the administration period of at least about 3 months.
 36. The method of claim 32, wherein the second mcg/day dose is at least two times greater than the first mcg/day dose.
 37. The method of claim 32, wherein the method further comprises at least one more continuous administration period providing a dose escalation of the insulinotrophic peptide to a higher mcg/day dose relative to the second mcg/day dose.
 38. The method of claim 32, wherein the method further comprises at least one more continuous administration period providing a dose at the same mcg/day dose as the second mcg/day dose.
 39. The method of claim 32, wherein the insulinotrophic peptide is an exenatide, and the first mcg/day dose followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is selected from the group consisting of: about 10 mcg/day followed by about 20 mcg/day; about 10 mcg/day followed by about 40 mcg/day; about 10 mcg/day followed by about 60 mcg/day; about 10 mcg/day followed by about 80 mcg/day; about 20 mcg/day followed by about 40 mcg/day; about 20 mcg/day followed by about 60 mcg/day; about 20 mcg/day followed by about 80 mcg/day; about 40 mcg/day followed by about 60 mcg/day; about 40 mcg/day followed by about 80 mcg/day; and about 60 mcg/day followed by about 80 mcg/day.
 40. The method of claim 39, wherein the first mcg/day dose followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is about 20 mcg/day followed by about 40 mcg/day.
 41. The method of claim 39, wherein the first mcg/day dose followed by the second mcg/day dose for continuous delivery is about 20 mcg/day followed by about 60 mcg/day.
 42. The method of claim 1 or 20, wherein the insulinotrophic peptide comprises GLP-1 or an incretin mimetic selected the group consisting of a GLP-1 peptide, a peptide analog of GLP-1, a peptide derivative of GLP-1, the exenatide having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, native exendin-4, an exenatide peptide, a peptide analog of exenatide, and a peptide derivative of exenatide.
 43. The method of claim 1 or 22, wherein the insulinotrophic peptide is selected from the group consisting of lixisenatide, liraglutide, albiglutide, and taspoglutide.
 44. The method of claim 1 or 22, wherein the vehicle formulation comprises a solvent and a polymer.
 45. The method of claim 44, wherein the vehicle formulation has a viscosity of between about 10,000 poise and about 20,000 poise at 37° C.
 46. The method of claim 44, wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of benzyl benzoate, lauryl lactate, and lauryl alcohol.
 47. The method of claim 44, wherein the polymer is a polyvinylpyrrolidone.
 48. The method of claim 1, wherein the subject has a baseline HbA1c % of less than or equal to 12.0%.
 49. The method of claim 1, wherein the subject is a human.
 50. The method of claim 1, wherein the subject has not previously received a drug for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.
 51. The method of claim 1, wherein the subject is further provided one or more other drugs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.
 52. The method of claim 51, wherein the one or more other drugs is insulin or an anti-diabetic drug selected from the group consisting of a DPP4 inhibitor, a SGLT2 inhibitor, metformin, a sulfonylurea, and a thiazolidinedione (TZD). 